In Peter Moskos’ article “In Lieu of Prison, Bring Back the Lash,” Moskos presents flogging as a means of decreasing prison populations. In the article, he states that “America has a prison problem,” and that this problem comes from a larger number of people being incarcerated and for a longer amount of time. The Moskos' solution to this ever increasing problem, is to bring back flogging. Penitentiaries, he says, were created to avoid corporal punishment, but the rate of crime did not decrease and the prisons began to fill very quickly. Moskos presents that the truly dangerous criminals should remain behind bars, but those who are likely to be released should be offered the choice to receive a flogging instead of incarceration.
In 1757, a sailor who was convicted of sexually assaulting a young male received a beating of 500 lashes, while in 1762, two men received 1000 lashes each for engaging in consensual sex, and in 1806, there were more hangings in England for sodomy than there were for murder offences. Chapter 3 of Rum, Sodomy and the Lash stresses the differences between a pirate’s trial versus a sodomist’s trial in court. Turley explains that pirates are economic criminals, and their crimes directly threaten property. At the same time, sodomites do not put the public in danger but rather challenge the separation between males and females and are no longer a part of the domestic economy and are instead a threat to society’s economic order. It is evident that sodomy was viewed as the worst offence and did not protect the public from real, dangerous
Jeff Jacoby’s “Bring Back Flogging” is a very interesting piece of writing. Jacoby clearly states his thesis because it is his title. He uses techniques which are evidence, assumptions and quotes from credible authorities. Jacoby has persuaded me to agree that flogging should be brought back in certain cases.
In Jeff Jacoby’s “Bring Back Flogging,” he compares the punishments for crimes in the 17th Century to the punishments for crimes in the present. Jacoby suggests in his essay that “the Puritans were more enlightened than we think, at least on the subject of punishment. Their sanctions were humiliating and painful, but quick and cheap.” Jacoby makes a good argument to bring back an old punishment policy. He points out that “a humiliating and painful paddling can be applied to the rear end of a crook for a lot less than $30,000 (per year).”
Jacoby believes flogging is far more effective than incarceration because the cost is less, it teaches a lesson and it will prevent more prisoners. Also the author gives the reader some examples of puritan style of punishment that was very popular about 150 years ago, then he proceeds to give the reader some facts and statistics about incarceration and supports
It was somewhat included, but what included was when Jacoby reasons that, “Of course, their crimes are not out crimes: We do not arrest blasphemers or adulterers” (para. 10). Here Jacoby reveals how flogging was used as cruel punishment for actions that are more common now. When the puritans used flogging for those same crimes. These behaviors, blasphemers or adulterers, are more common now. Puritans saw them as crimes, because these crimes went against their religious beliefs.
Branding, whipping, shackles, and work were used as punishments in other cases, such as the Salem Witch Trials and Boston Massacre. The purpose of this document is to set a precedent, or standard, for the crime of escaping servitude or slavery. The document states
Jeff Jacoby provides a strong argument in “Bring Back Flogging”, suggesting that we should adopt a few of the punishments of the Puritans. This argument is built on logical appeal, emotional appeal, and his own personal credibility as a writer. Providing statistics and information, Jacoby creates the logos, or logical appeal, and ethos, or personal credibility. In Addition, he uses ethos, or emotional appeal to force the reader to think about what they believe is morally worse. In “Bring Back Flogging”, Jacoby says Puritan forefathers punished crimes with flogging, including whipping and branding; however, in current times we tend to put a person in jail, no matter the crime.
In the article, “Bring Back Flogging” by Jeff Jacoby states that flogging should be brought back for criminals instead of putting them in prisons. The United States imprisons more people than any other country. Crime is getting out of control and the crime rate is a 250 percent increased since 1980. Many inmates that are convicted of felons are released to early or not locked up at all. The price of keeping criminals behind bars is about $30,000 per inmate per year.
Introduction: Clear, concise, and cohesive: all necessities of an argument. Matthew Sanders, a college professor at the University of Utah, writes in his online bio that he enjoys analyzing the ways of teaching and learning, which is exactly what Sanders does in his book. In Matthew L, Sanders’ book Becoming a Learner: Realizing the Opportunity of Education he argues that college is meant to develop a person into a greater being not to teach them job skills. To develop Sanders’ claim, learning is more than just retaining facts, he correctly aligns his rhetorical situation and uses elements of generative and persuasive arguments. These techniques can include new angles, appeals, storytelling, and many other strategies to influence its readers
Should Public Humiliation Be Used As A Punishment For Crime? In The Scarlet Letter, Nathaniel Hawthorne uses public humiliation to shame a puritan women named Hester Prynne for her sin of adultery. To punish her for her sin, the puritan officials of the community force her to wear a scarlet letter “A” upon her chest to publicly shame her and so that everyone in the community can mock her for her sin. Public humiliation is still used by people and by the government in some ways as a punishment.
During the Medieval Period, the punishment one received depended on the severity of the crime. Also, more crimes were committed during this time because it was hard to find jobs at the time, the poor had hardly any choice but to steal to survive [S5]. However, people today usually get a fine for most crimes, such as speeding or stealing. Serious crimes, like murder or rape, people get sent to jail for a certain amount of time depending on the severity of the crime. The way we punish today is very different to the way people were punished in medieval times.
Assault, murder and theft are all considered common committed crimes, but the way people were punished for committing these crimes are very different compared to today. Punishment is defined as penalty as justice for a wrongdoing. These penalties were more cruel and violent than they are today. The development of punishment can be traced from Greek and Roman times, through the Middle Ages and up to the Age of Enlightenment. To start things off, during the Greek and Roman Times, there was no such thing as a nice punishment.
The Elizabethan Era was filled with crime and corruption throughout the entire Era. Crimes were looked at as a horrible thing during this time and led to severe punishment. Many of these punishments consisted of torture or at its worst, death. Some of the simplest crimes such as stealing another person's boots could lead to a loss of your legs. Another large issue during this time was the way that the government and court system was run.
There is a worldwide trend in the use of penal imprisonment for serious offenses as capital punishment has been renounced by an increasing number of countries. Harsh punishments include capital punishment, life imprisonment and long-term incarceration. These forms of punishments are usually used against serious crimes that are seen as unethical, such as murder, assault and robbery. Many people believe that harsher punishments are more effective as they deter would-be criminals and ensure justice is served. Opposition towards harsh punishments have argued that harsher punishments does not necessarily increase effectiveness because they do not have a deterrent effect, do not decrease recidivism rates and do not provide rehabilitation.
