In 1757, a sailor who was convicted of sexually assaulting a young male received a beating of 500 lashes, while in 1762, two men received 1000 lashes each for engaging in consensual sex, and in 1806, there were more hangings in England for sodomy than there were for murder offences. Chapter 3 of Rum, Sodomy and the Lash stresses the differences between a pirate’s trial versus a sodomist’s trial in court. Turley explains that pirates are economic criminals, and their crimes directly threaten property. At the same time, sodomites do not put the public in danger but rather challenge the separation between males and females and are no longer a part of the domestic economy and are instead a threat to society’s economic order. It is evident that sodomy was viewed as the worst offence and did not protect the public from real, dangerous
Jeff Jacoby’s “Bring Back Flogging” is a very interesting piece of writing. Jacoby clearly states his thesis because it is his title. He uses techniques which are evidence, assumptions and quotes from credible authorities. Jacoby has persuaded me to agree that flogging should be brought back in certain cases.
Men were flogged, whipped, and even run out of town for
First, the punition of slavery state does not depend on the iniquity of conviction and could ply to prisoners refute of piracy as well as massacre. By sweeping so broadly, bondage as beating loses any restraint outcome it might have had if targeted to a particular rank of crimes. Second, deterrence is sap by the pronounced racial dynamics in the modern action of prisons, whereby minority racial groups are way overrepresented in prison populations. Accordingly, members of these family may instead trust that, whether or not they commit thief Acts of the Apostles, the purpose of prison is weakly to digest their enslaved condition. Last, slavery status undermines the goals of rehabilitation forasmuch as prisoners experience feelings of unfairness as they undergo a punishment logical by a prison administrator rather than a sentencing
In addition, transitioning to the present-day system, Jacoby highlights the modern issues in prison “The Boston Globe reported in 1994 that more than 200,000 prison inmates are raped each year, usually to the indifference of the guards.” This information serves as a strong emotional approach, challenging readers to question the morality and humanity of our modern convictions. Lastly, Jacoby poses the question whether “puritans were more enlightened than we think, at least on the subject of punishment.” Jacoby strategically plays on the readers emotions, empathizing with a reflection upon the modern penal system. The idea of a quick, painful, corporal punishment as a potential alternative invites the reader to consider whether such measures are more humane and emotionally tolerable than the hidden atrocities within the penitentiary system.
In Jeff Jacoby’s “Bring Back Flogging,” he compares the punishments for crimes in the 17th Century to the punishments for crimes in the present. Jacoby suggests in his essay that “the Puritans were more enlightened than we think, at least on the subject of punishment. Their sanctions were humiliating and painful, but quick and cheap.” Jacoby makes a good argument to bring back an old punishment policy. He points out that “a humiliating and painful paddling can be applied to the rear end of a crook for a lot less than $30,000 (per year).”
1 Monica Sanad Professor Benjamin Bever English 112 18 March 2016 Primitive Punishments: Analysis of Bring Back Flogging by Jeff Jacoby In retrospect, Jeff Jacoby demanded the return of flogging in 1997, when he wrote an article that discusses his justifications for supporting flogging: an act of punishing guilty people using whipping, paddling or any other torturous method. The Puritans were notorious for punishing people by flogging during the 17th century. Jacoby used a lucid and strong title that clearly states the purpose and the thesis of his article, he also used a sub heading for his essay: “Boston’s Puritan Forefathers did not indulge miscreants lightly”
It was somewhat included, but what included was when Jacoby reasons that, “Of course, their crimes are not out crimes: We do not arrest blasphemers or adulterers” (para. 10). Here Jacoby reveals how flogging was used as cruel punishment for actions that are more common now. When the puritans used flogging for those same crimes. These behaviors, blasphemers or adulterers, are more common now. Puritans saw them as crimes, because these crimes went against their religious beliefs.
Jeff Jacoby provides a strong argument in “Bring Back Flogging”, suggesting that we should adopt a few of the punishments of the Puritans. This argument is built on logical appeal, emotional appeal, and his own personal credibility as a writer. Providing statistics and information, Jacoby creates the logos, or logical appeal, and ethos, or personal credibility. In Addition, he uses ethos, or emotional appeal to force the reader to think about what they believe is morally worse. In “Bring Back Flogging”, Jacoby says Puritan forefathers punished crimes with flogging, including whipping and branding; however, in current times we tend to put a person in jail, no matter the crime.
As such, American colonists carried the practice of flogging with them to the New World. Mutilation was another know alternative, which involved a strategy of specific deterrence that made it difficult or impossible for individuals to commit future crimes. Throughout history, various
Punishments are dealt freely and in some cases without real reasoning, rather as a way to inforce superiority of the oppressors. “I no longer felt anything except the lashes of the whip” (Wiesel 57). Young Wiesel is receives twenty-five lashes by a whip, for merely being at the wrong place at the wrong time when searching desperately for the possibility of a scrap of food. Cruel punishments for no crime torture to keep men silent. The lashes were used as a threat, torture to enforce that he is the slave, forced to work or die, and Idek as the Overseer, watching close with a whip and an iron fist.
They were hanged from chains and whipped till they were no longer able to scream. This unjust treatment was aimed to tame mental individual from “lashing out.” Their mental conditions were unrecognized; they were forced to endure harsh “punishments” due to their mental state of mind. The stand
These criminals are hung in public in order to set an example. Radical views of that society has led to drastic punishment; the doctors’ and scientists’ “crimes are retroactive”
The Puritans form of discipline for crime and punishment is strict and the United States criminal justice system has used the Puritan form of discipline for the system. Puritans origin still plays a role in our current criminal justice system, which
The attractiveness of this theory is primarily based on the ethical code that Hampton subscribes to, which is that pain-inflicted punishments should not be condoned when it comes to disciplining wrongdoers. Rather, constructive analysis done pertaining to why certain actions are morally wrong in society would be intellectually stimulating and productive for both the wrongdoers and the public, all while avoiding the infliction of physical pain. Compared to the retributivist argument, which circulates around the idea that the purpose of punishment is to make wrongdoers pay for their misdeeds, and that they should be treated the way that they have treated others, the MET is a more humane way to treat wrongdoers, and in the long run, would perhaps help them emerge from confinement as better citizens within society, rather than as potential repeat offenders. Therefore, the appeal of the MET stems from the positive implications of treating wrongdoers with respect and dignity, all while teaching them why their actions were wrong while simultaneously instilling positive and moral values in their psyche before allowing them to re-enter
