On July 29, 2003 Detective Jason Leavitt was a part of a decoy operation with an undercover arrest team ; he was dressed on black jeans, a dirty short- sleeved flannel shirt on top of a dirty-t shirt, and a baseball cap to apart as a drunk homeless man . Detective Leavitt carried Twenty one-dollar bills in his breast pocket, to attract a thief. Leavitt was on the block of 200 Main St across from the Greyhound station. The Appellant Richard Miller approached Detective Leavitt on this very street to ask him for money. Detective Leavitt told Miller he was not going to give him an money, Leavitt testified that the appellant put his arm around him and asked him to go get a drink.
RELATED CASES: None. SUPPORT DOCUMENTS: One Page ERC Correspondence, Two Pages EOS CCA Correspondence, One Page Pasco Sheriff`s Office Affidavit Of Identity Theft, and One Page Photocopy of Jean Weeks`s Florida Driver License. On 04/26/2016, I spoke with Jean Weeks and her daughter Kathryn Weeks in the District II Lobby of Pasco Sheriff`s Office in reference to Identity Theft that occurred in another jurisdiction. Kathryn Weeks advised her mother received a collection notice from ERC dated 03/16/2016 in reference to a Sprint bill in the amount of $1,580.45. Kathryn said she contacted ERC and learned a Sprint account was opened in 01/2015, using her mother`s personal identification (name, date of birth, and social security number)
Case Citation: Maryland v. Pringle 540 U.S. 366 (2003) Parties: State of Maryland, Petitioner / Appellant Joseph Jermaine Pringle, Defendant / Appellee Facts: On the morning of August 7th, 1999 at 3:16 a.m., a Baltimore Police Officer conducted a stop on a passenger car for speeding. As the officer approached the car he noticed it was occupied by three males one of which was the respondent, Joseph Jermaine Pringle located in the front passenger seat. As the driver retrieved the vehicle’s proof of registration for the glove compartment located in front of Pringle, the officer noticed what appeared to be a large amount of currency rolled up in the glove compartment in plain view. After obtaining the driver’s license and registration, the police officer went back to his patrol car and conducted a check for warrants and prior traffic violations.
This memorandum provides the outline for the initial interview of Jordan Archer concerning the criminal defense representation for an expected charge(s) of embezzlement. I. CRIMINAL CHARGES In order to conduct an effective interview to acquire the relevant facts necessary to the case, it is imperative to obtain facts pertaining to the elements of the crime, any documents or witnesses relevant to the alleged crime, and which degree of the crime, if any, could be charged in this case. First, during the interview it is vital to ask the client what property belonging to the church is alleged to have been converted, how the client had access to such property owned by the church that is alleged to have been taken by the client, what fiduciary role the client held within the church, and whether the client intended to convert the property of the church for her own benefit. Next, it is important to ask the client whether there are any witnesses that can provide a testimony that the client is not involved in the embezzlement.
on 08/18/2017 friday i officer bell was dispatched to the station in regards to a walk in. upon my arrival i made contact with a donna campeau. campeau stated that on 08/17/17 Thursday she had tried to use her debit card at Dodges gas station and it was declined. she later found out that $293.50 had been used to pay a sprint wireless phone bill.
POs Jackson, Velez, and Colon were part of the Burglary Apprehension Team headed by Chief Boyce. One of the team’s responsibility was to inspect pawn shops every two weeks to ensure that owners of the pawn shops were in complies with DCA regulation. The team
On 10-24-2017 I was dispatched and responded to 6009 Ridge Rd. (Salvation Army) reference to a lost purse. Upon arrival I met with the complainant, Edith Caudill. Edith stated that she left her purse within a shopping cart at approximately 11:30AM. Edith later discovered that she did not have her purse and returned to the business at approximately 3:18PM.
Ms. Rosario number # 8444846 and Care # 432278 unit 6B went to security guard desk to tell him that her wife Eveleen Murray was arguing and she throw the unit key to through window. Ms. Rosario also stated that her wife was cursing on her. Ms. Murray is very problematic client and she was arguing with the appliance master staff Mr. Mark and she didn’t want him to fix the refrigerator. I went back to the Mr. Mark and I explain to her that she was complaining about her refrigerator leaking few weeks ago and they had to do their job. She would not refuse for them to do their work.
The men in the car, described as Polish, with pale skin, in which Sacco as tan skin. Both defendants offered alibis, which supported, by several witnesses. Vanzetti testified that he sold fish at the time of the Braintree robbery. Sacco testified that he applied in Boston for a passport at the Italian embassy. Judge Thayer decided to deny may witnesses because of their race, Italian.
The facts in this case are as follows: on November 1 at 10 pm a murder of a boy was taken place in front of his apartment on 12th Street. Three suspects pulled the trigger on a nearby man who was standing, but the man was not harm. However, a boy was hit in the head by a stray bullet from a 9mm pistol died before he was able to get to the hospital. Community members blamed the murder on police. They commanded that the police should be more responsible on the issue of gun violence in the neighborhood and find the 3 suspects who murdered the boy.
Madrid v. Gomez exposed in detail of the mental deterioration in prisoners of and of abusive behavior by prison officers. Simon argues that most importantly, the case was the first to correctly identify the constitutional significance of mass incarceration’s failure to reckon with biological and psychological consequences of its practices and the consequent threat to human dignity. In other words, not only does Supermax incarceration legally take away a prisoners liberty, but it also denies them pure human existence and biological existence.
This transaction was soon brought to the attention of the head of security of Finlay Fine Jewelry, Dietz was asked to go to an interview with some other associates (Walsh, 2013). Legal Issues with the Case /Basis of the Claim With Dietz v. Finlay Fine Jewelry, I see many issues with this case. The plaintiff Melissa Dietz presented many claims to the court. 1. Dietz’s false imprisonment claim was not properly dismissed because Finlay Fine Jewelry had proof that she gave the unauthorized discount.
On September 23, 2015, AP closed an internal case at the Hudson’s Bay Centre- Laval store for a value of $25.24. Exception reports alerted AP that the associate had used his own rewards card on customer’s purchases. The associate was interviewed and admitted the reward’s point theft and also a previous theft of merchandise.
RELATED CASES: None SUPPORT DOCUMENTS: None On 10/21/2015, Sarah Hopkins contacted Pasco Sheriff`s Office by telephone to report a Petit Theft. Ms. Hopkins advised sometime between 1800 hours on 10/19/2015, and 0800 hours on 10/20/2015, an unknown suspect stole a bank envelope out of her purse that contained twenty $5.00 bills. Ms. Hopkins stated her son took her to the bank on 10/15/2015, where she obtained $450.00 in cash, separated by denomination and divided into four envelopes as $200.00 in twenty dollar bills, $100.00 in ten dollar bills, $100.00 in five dollar bills and $50.00 in one dollar bills.
