ipl-logo

Summary Of Survival Lottery By John Harris

987 Words4 Pages

In “Survival Lottery” by John Harris (1), Harris argued that if two people are on a transplant list, Z and Y, with no available organs that it is still neglect and murder for the doctors to not kill innocent person A to save their lives. Harris believes most philosophers would go against this idea because of the moral difference in killing compared to letting one die. This would rule out killing A to save Y and Z because of the obligation to not kill trumps saving a life. The argument that A is innocent and therefore should not die is shut down by Z and Y because they also are innocent in the sense of not having preemptive actions that lead to their illness and eventual death. Z and Y were unfortunate in becoming deathly ill where A was not, …show more content…

Doctors would disagree with the system because although it would be murder if a doctor did not perform that which they were capable of to save a life, killing the innocent to save others would go against a doctor’s job which is to not intentionally kill. Harris proposed society could call the process of selection for donating organs to be called “giving life” as a suitable euphemism for easier implementation. Although donor deaths would increase, the net rate of deaths due to this and those of untimely, unfortunate deaths would ultimately decrease according to the argument made by Harris. Harris theoretically talks about a newly discovered planet that has a society like that of Earth but with the lottery system in place. Harris argues that those who deny giving their life for others would be considered murders and the planet would have no right to life or freedom but a duty to maximize the number of people who may …show more content…

As much as Z and Y claim to not intentionally kill A but rather just have a couple organs to preserve their lives and in the process if A dies then so be it, this argument is invalid for they are receiving organs required to live causing A to ultimately die every time proving intent to murder an innocent life necessary for their survival. Harris fails to acknowledge that the system presented by Z and Y assumes individuals have a duty to be Good Samaritans(GS) that are required to make large sacrifices for others and will participate in voluntary euthanasia but face the consequences of being accused as murderers if they choose to not participate in the system. Judith Thompson argues in “A Defense of Abortion” that we ought to be Minimally Decent Samaritans(MDS) where individuals should help save another’s life without significant sacrifice, like dying, even if the person has no right to the assistance(2). If individuals are expected and required to participate in the system, this creates involuntary euthanasia that is wrong to impose on healthy individuals with futures ahead of them. Calling an innocent individual who doesn’t want his/her future to be stripped from them a murderer for not participating in a program that risks their own life is wrong of Z and Y. As misfortunate as the situation is for Z and Y, they have no right

Show More
Related
930 Words | 4 Pages

Both “the lottery” by Shirley Jackson and “first they came” by Martin Niemoller deal with following the crowd can have disastrous consequences. If you follow the crowd sometimes we can get in trouble for someone else. And if someone is doing something stupid and they told you to come or do it with them you can get in trouble for that to. “The lottery” had some sketchy history be hide it. Some people think if you win a lottery you win a prize like money or a new car but not in this story if you win the lottery you win death.

Read More
1039 Words | 5 Pages

If this same practice is put into use in the context of physician assisted suicide and euthanasia, a line can be drawn to prevent undesirable consequences stemming from a philosophical

Read More
1056 Words | 5 Pages

Saunders challenges the negative moral perception of opt-out organ donation system by challenging the Kantian moral value, where is it difficult for one to realize whether he or she had done right thing if it is harder or more costly to you. He gives some twisted examples of making the donation system difficult for the donors to go through series of testing and have them pay fees to make the donating much more a difficult task to fit the Kant’s description of Moral worth action. By offering this ridiculous example, he is trying to make the point that when it comes down to organ donation, where it is to save lives of the others in needs, there is no reason to distinguish the moral value the one will get by donating his or her organ either under opt-in system, “difficult system”, or Opt-out system, “Easier System”. He also makes his point that people who decides to donate their organ, when it is easy for them to decide, assuming that they know that they are in terminal condition in death bed or what not, it doesn’t show moral worthy of the person as well.

Read More
491 Words | 2 Pages

Why We Keeping Playing the Lottery In Adam Piore’s article why we keep playing the lottery, there are some very great observation about why we keep to throw money at something that seems impossible to win. The genre of this essay is report. He reports about the advertisers’ way of grab their customers’ attention to push them continue playing the lottery like using the slogan “Hey, you never know... ”The lottery in the United State is so exceedingly popular that it was one of the few customer products where spending held steady and, in some states ,increased ,during the recent recession. Piore states the Gallup recent study that is about fifty-seven percent of American’s reported buying tickets in the last twelve months.

Read More
641 Words | 3 Pages

The Lottery Rose The book The Lottery Rose, by Irene Hunt is a book about a young seven year old boy named Georgie Burgess. He gets abused by his mother and her boyfriend, who goes by the name of Steve. After Steve and Georgie’s mother get caught, Georgie goes to a boarding school in the countryside. Georgie goes from being rude, unforgiving, and untrusting and learns to be more forgiving, trusting, and literate.

Read More
362 Words | 2 Pages

Fritz Oehlschlaegar links the meaning of “The Lottery” to patriarchy. He suggests that the event was a depiction of the way the male dominated over women sexuality in the society. According to the author, women gave birth to many children to increase their survival probabilities during the “The Lottery”. He also discusses the conflict between male authority and women resistance. He suggests that the women did not support the event, felt it was unfair but could not however raise their opinions since they were submissive to their husbands, and were controlled by the men.

Read More
1609 Words | 7 Pages

Philosopher John Harris, proposed the experiment of the survival lottery. The survival lottery basically says that if two people (Y and Z) are facing death and could be saved by killing one other person (A) and using their organs for transplant, then we should go ahead and kill A to save the lives of the ones who need the organ transplants. The argument he is making is based strictly on the grounds that the number of lives saved would greatly outway the number of lives that were taken from individuals. Some basic assumptions would need to be made as well. First off, each life would have to be assumed to be of equal value, two lives saved are more valuable than the killing of a single life, the two lives would have to be cured and of a better

Read More
1009 Words | 5 Pages

“The Lottery" is a verdict of depraved tradition of a community. The story surrounds a town where the lottery is drawn every year as a sacrifice ritual one 's life for a good fertile crop. The lottery rose up public opinions when it first published in 1948. It is a piece of Shirley Jackson in which she wrote about inhumanity and violence among human based on her real experience when she moved to a small town and was rejected by its people. Shirley Jackson always believed in sinful spirit within each individual self as her writing style portrayed the vicious side of her and people 's souls, “The dark current of awareness of evil that runs through her life and work seems too strong to have as its sole root the observance of suburban hypocrisy” (Judy Oppenhaimer).

Read More
616 Words | 3 Pages

Say you are a doctor and working at a hospital in the middle of nowhere. There are five patients in need of organs, but the hospital doesn't have any organs for them at the time. There is a sixth patient that is an organ donor and is in need of medicine. If you give the medicine to the sixth patient they will live or if you don't they will die and you can use their organs to save the other five patients. So the question is would you kill patient six to save the five patients that are in need of organs, or give the medicine to patient six and let the five patients die?

Read More
865 Words | 4 Pages

Historically, in every culture, important practices exist which transmit traditional values to subsequent generations as traditions is a critical piece of our culture. They help developing and moulding the attitudes and characters of humans, forming the structure and foundation of families and our society. Notwithstanding, many traditions promote social unity and coherent, some traditions erode the integrity, psychological and physical health of individuals as can be seen in the story “The Lottery” writer by Shirley Jackson. In the story, head of the families take a lot in choosing the family that going to sacrifice one of the family members to increase the crop yield. Furthermore, the story “Looking for Rain God” written by Bessie Head reflects the belief in traditional practices, resulting in merciless death of two children.

Read More
1513 Words | 7 Pages

Healthcare Ethics: Savior Siblings A current ethical debate in the world of healthcare is Savior siblings. A savior sibling is a child who is born to be genetically compatible with a sibling that is suffering from a life-threatening disease. The child is born to provide either organ or cell transplant, and/or blood transfusions for the ill sibling. The child is created through in vitro fertilization (IVF), once the embryo goes through preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), it helps identify genetic defects within the embryos.

Read More
562 Words | 3 Pages

The short story The Lottery by Shirley Jackson. It was published in 1948 in a magazine called The New Yorker. In the beginning of The Lottery there were kids collecting rocks and the families were gathering. It was a sunny clear day on June 27 on the day of the lottery Old man warner said lottery in June corn be heavy soon. So the Black box was carried out to the location to be ready for The Lottery.

Read More
1897 Words | 8 Pages

Many people feel they are being persuaded into doing acts that they don’t want to, or having judgments that they don’t believe in, all because people are used to doing what they see others do. In Chris Abani’s short story The Lottery, he was only a 10 year old boy when he got pressured into seeing a man burn and had to also spit on him. Langston Hughes was also a young boy in Salvation, when he had to lie in church, about being saved by Jesus. In the short piece Why Are Beggars Despised? George Orwell does not see a difference in beggars who live on the streets and working people.

Read More
650 Words | 3 Pages

“The Lottery”, a short story by Shirley Jackson, is about a lottery that takes place in a small village. The story starts off with the whole town gathering in the town square, where Mr. Summers holds the lottery. Once everyone gathers, every family draws a slip of paper out of an old black box, and the family with the black mark on their paper gets picked. After that, each family member older than 3 years of age re-draws a slip of paper again and this time, the person with the black mark on their paper gets picked as the “lucky winner” of the lottery. In this short story, after the Hutchinson family gets drawn, Tessie Hutchinson is declared “winner” of the lottery, with her reward is being stoned to death.

Read More
606 Words | 3 Pages

Thank you to N7 for accepting this debate. It is my first. I apologize up front if my formatting or technique is lacking. Feedback is appreciated. I affirm the resolution that “It is morally permissible to kill one innocent person to save the lives of more innocent people.”

Read More

More about Summary Of Survival Lottery By John Harris

Related Topics

Open Document