The debate on abortion rights in the United States has been a continuous and deeply polarized argument from both sides, often clouded by emotional ideologies. In a recent article, Noah Rothman argues against what is perceived as growing extremism when it comes to abortion rights, accusing them of “fetishizing” the procedure. Rothman criticized public figures such as Michelle Wolf for her support for abortion, as well as Democrats for what they see as displays of support and extremism when it comes to abortion rights. This argument fails to acknowledge the complexities of the abortion debate and the importance of reproductive rights that impact women's health. Noah Rothman’s article is unsuccessful at providing a convincing argument against …show more content…
Rothman describing the pro-choice stance as a “fetish” for abortion is an oversimplification that does not integrate the moral and ethical considerations of this controversial topic (Rothman). The pro-choice movement advocates for women's right to make their own choices when it comes to reproduction, free from government interference, and not celebrating abortion. By simplifying the meaning and definition of the pro-choice movement to fetishize abortion, Rothman misrepresents the intricate realities of reproductive rights. Furthermore, the author's argument ignored the underlying reasons why people support women's rights to abortion. For many individuals, their support for pro-choice comes from the belief in bodily autonomy and the right to privacy, recognizing that women can make informed decisions about their own bodies and futures (Kulik). Rothman’s notions on abortion have failed to recognize these fundamental principles, falling short of addressing people's values, ultimately giving a misrepresentation of the pro-choice