ipl-logo

Summary Of Under The Mushroom Cloud

1083 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Policies of the cold war

1. Downing, Taylor. “Under the Mushroom Cloud” History Today 58, no. 8 (2008): 22-23.
a. Multiple times during the Cold War, the United States and the Soviet Union came close to engaging in a nuclear war, but they did not due to the principle of Mutually Assured Destruction(MAD). However, now that the Cold War has ended and several more countries have become nuclear powers, game theory states that international politics will become less stable and predictable. This negates the effects of the principle of MAD and makes nuclear war a larger possibility. The article supports its argument with historical facts about the Cold War and game theory.
b. Taylor Downing is a writer and a historian who has published several books about the Cold War. He …show more content…

The article suggests that the current doctrine of MAD followed by nuclear powers is not needed nor is it relevant. MAD requires a country to have many nuclear weapons ready to fire rapidly and that a country has many nuclear to devastate your opponent in case of attack. However, now that the Cold War and nuclear arms race are over as well, it makes no sense financially for the United States and Russia to keep such massive nuclear arsenals that are expensive to maintain. The author seeks for countries to replace the MAD doctrine with a Cooperative Threat Reduction doctrine, which is a form of nuclear non-proliferation for nuclear powers where countries could reduce the amount and build alliances with each other. The author backs up their claims with facts and statistics
b. Michael Krepon is a co-founder and author for the American thinktank called The Stimson Center, he has taught at the University of Virginia and he worked on nuclear arms control for U.S. President Jimmy Carter. The Stimson Center focuses on a wide range of global issues from nuclear non-proliferation, wildlife protection, water security and other issues. He has been working in the field of nuclear weapons and non-proliferation since 1989 and is an expert in the field. The cited article has 18 other citations and was published in a peer-reviewed …show more content…

Holdstock, Douglas and Waterston, Lis. “Nuclear Weapons, a Continuing Threat to Health.” The Lancet 355, no. 9214 (2000): 1544-1547.
a. Nuclear weapons, even when not involved in nuclear war, are still bad for the public. Misunderstandings or terrorism could result in the detonation of a nuclear bomb. Miners of uranium and plutonium for nuclear bombs have higher rates of lung cancers than non-miners. Areas close to nuclear test zones still have higher levels of radiation than normal even after more than 50 years and the surrounding areas and the residents have higher chances of certain cancers. The author supports their claims with statistics and facts.
b. Douglas Holdstock was a noted doctor and gastroenterologist at Ashford Hospital in Middlesex in the United Kingdom who focused on the effects of radioactivity and nuclear weapons on health. He is an expert in the field publishing several books and articles on the effects of radiation on health. Lis Waterston is a doctor who has only published this article. The cited article has been cited in 15 other articles and was published in a peer reviewed

Show More
Related
1291 Words | 6 Pages

This book talks about when the United States almost started a full nuclear war because of a few soviet missiles flew into the states allegedly. They flew B-47s and B-52s as air fleets for 40 years of this international problem between the Soviet Union and the United States. In the year 1945 America ended World War 2, as the head nuclear power in the world. Even though the U.S. was the nuclear power, they did not have any nuclear bombs. The whole point of this “cold war” was to maintain a peace among uneasy times, which did not work.

Read More
1850 Words | 8 Pages

These groups had different opinions on two specific aspects of the nuclear struggle and Strategic Defense Initiative. The first was the debatable level of the threat of the Soviet Union. The second was whether or not arms control was necessary. For many historians, the policies and processes caused the Soviet Union and the Cold War to come to their conclusions. This network of processes rather than the leading figures were the factors in creating the certain stages of the Cold War.

Read More
319 Words | 2 Pages

One option during the Cuban Missile Crisis was to go into an all out nuclear war. None of the countries wanted this option, but it was still possible. This is true because in Document C it says, “The most important thing for us is to get an agreement as soon as possible.” This proves that both the USSR and the US wanted to come to a quick

Read More
611 Words | 3 Pages

The potential global issue that is raised within this text is the theoretical Interstate war between the rogue state North Korea and the United States caused by the weapons of mass destruction being developed by North Korea and their new capability to reach the USA due to the successful miniaturization of the war heads and the ability to apply them to intercontinental ballistic missiles. For example when the author, Richard. N. Haase, writes that the reasons for the meeting between the CIA and the President is: ‘North Korea has succeeded in making a nuclear bomb small enough to fit inside the tip of an intercontinental ballistic missile capable of reaching the continental United States.’ This theoretical war has recently become more and more of a

Read More
532 Words | 3 Pages

We know from history that when planning a re-division of the world, the imperialist powers have always lined up military blocks.”. Furthermore, they also used alliances to block each other off and defend themselves. These alliances are listed as NATO and Warsaw Pact in Document 5. One last weapon in the arms race, this was a time of building up nuclear weapons and the threat to use them if necessary. But for some, it was a reason to avoid war.

Read More
1094 Words | 5 Pages

This is a powerful argument, as it appeals to the emotions of the reader by suggesting a devastating and irreversible outcome if nuclear weapons are not abolished. They warn, “Shall we put an end to the human race, or shall mankind renounce war?” This statement is a stark reminder of the potential consequences of our actions and the need to work together to prevent such a catastrophic event. The authors argue that the use of nuclear weapons would result in the destruction of civilization as we know it. They claim that the only way to prevent a nuclear war is to eliminate nuclear weapons altogether.

Read More
1495 Words | 6 Pages

It was an effective tactic because neither side of a conflict could contemplate mutually assured destruction in a nuclear war, acting as a nuclear deterrence for both the side to pose damage, and the country on the 'receiving end'. This again depicts how brinkmanship prevented the cold war from becoming a hot war as each superpower took action in such a way their opposition would not react and remain at

Read More
688 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout the years of 1945 and 1991, the U.S. and the Soviet Union were involved in what is today is identified as the Cold War. During this dark time many lived in fear due to the newest weapon that would be used in war, nuclear weapons. These weapons caused fear throughout the whole world because of their capability to kill thousands with just one. Today many debate over the abolition of nuclear weapons in the United States. Some argue that the U.S. should abolish nuclear weapons, while others say nuclear weapons should not be abolished in the United States.

Read More
681 Words | 3 Pages

At the same time, Reagan was deeply worried about the accepted national policy that had come out since the Soviets acquired atomic weapons of "mutual assured destruction. " This said that the Soviet Union and United Sates would not attack each other out of fear. This, said Reagan, was "a truly mad policy." He believed that it was wrong to destroy the civilian population of another country in an attack.

Read More
993 Words | 4 Pages

Brinkmanship is a strategy that involves countries almost going to war without actually going to war (Ayers R92). The Cold War affected many presidents for an example president Truman's Presidential policy. According

Read More
1048 Words | 5 Pages

From the 1940’s through 1991, America and the Soviet Union were in the middle of a constant stalemate pitted against the ideologies of the Untied States idea of capitalism and the Soviet Union’s idea of Communism. Although most of the conflict was based around political viewpoints rather than military action, in between the 1945 to 1948, by 1950 the Soviet Union lead the communist takeover of China. According to the Teaching Elenaor Roosevelt Glossary study on the Cold War, by 1960, both sides had invested in a large amounts of money and effort towards nuclear weapons. From the perspective of both sides, this was seen as an attempt to maintain parity with each other's stockpiles, but also the idea of deterring conflict through "mutually assured destruction". This had come to be regarded as vital and dire to the national interest of both governing bodies.

Read More
1171 Words | 5 Pages

However, the real call for launching a nuke comes down to two other men who either must obey or disobey the leader. If they obey then the world will be in trouble, but if they disobey then the world might just live another day. The fact is this type of logic is found throughout many countries. Therefore, this interpretation of information strengthens the overall essay and his argument. Personal Thought

Read More
262 Words | 2 Pages

The art of fear is essential in nuclear deterrence. Using the film Dr. Strangelove (Stanley Kubrick, 1964) I will argue that nuclear deterrence is hard to achieve when communication of nuclear capabilities is not well established amongst states. In this paper, I will use the film Dr. Strangelove (1964) to argue how theories such as deterrence theory, realist theory, security dilemma, preventative war, pre-emptive war as well as relative gains and zero sum game led to a failure to achieve nuclear deterrence between the United States and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. To make my argument on how more nuclear weapons may hinder deterrence, this essay will proceed as follows; I will firstly discuss the how nuclear deterrence and mutually

Read More
775 Words | 4 Pages

It sounds a little far-fetched but this was during The Cold War; nuclear tension was at an all-time high between the world’s most powerful

Read More
469 Words | 2 Pages

Especially since Eisenhower believed in massive retaliation, which was funding the stockpiling of nuclear weapons and less funding to the army. Eisenhower’s policy had backlash from both conservatives and liberals. As stated in Document E, “...whether a policy accepting the first blow may be the best one.” People believed that massive retaliation was not the best way to avoid nuclear war. Document E serves the purpose of showing the faults of massive retaliations and how in the grand scheme it isn’t a sufficient way to keep away from a nuclear war.

Read More

More about Summary Of Under The Mushroom Cloud

Related Topics

Open Document