ipl-logo

The ASME Code Of Ethics

725 Words3 Pages

When looking at the ASME code of ethics we can see that ethical theories are being used. An argument can be made that two out of the three ethical theories are being used. The first one is utilitarianism which is number 5 on the fundamental canons. Which says that “Engineers shall respect the proprietary information and intellectual property rights of others, including charitable organizations and professional societies in the engineering field” (ASME Code of Ethics). This is utilitarianism because it serves as a protection from duplicating any innovations from other people in the profession. The next one is virtue ethics, which is number 8 on the fundamental canons. This says that “Engineers shall consider environmental impact and sustainable …show more content…

By having rule utilitarianism, it possesses more appeal, by focusing on moral rightness. This is because “instead of evaluating specific actions, decision-makers should act in accord with rules which, when widely followed, lead to an overall increase in utility” (Smith and Burgess, pg. 25). The reason why this leads to greater overall utility is because people can often make bad judgement. By having specific rules, it maximizes the effort an engineer can give by decreasing the ways in which engineers may endanger themselves and others. When looking at the ASME code of ethics now, all of the fundamental canons are sets of rules that the engineer must follow. With having rule-utilitarianism has the sole basis, we would just have to work out which rules creates the most happiness for engineers as a whole, and they will likely follow. With a utilitarianism approach, “engineers can focus on promoting the greatest good for the greatest number of people” (Smith and Burgess, pg. 24). This is important because by having a rule utilitarianism, moral rightness would not depend on a particular act at the moment. Instead, it would depend on the rule and how engineers would abide by it. By giving engineers a set of rules to follow, each engineer can use past experience and find different solutions to similar problems under these rules. This gives engineers a better understand of what they can and can’t do. Rule utilitarianism is an important theory for engineers because by having rules to guide them on what to do, they can’t do something that is unethical and can hurt the people they want to promote the greatest good for. One thing rule utilitarianism does is it also suggests a “broader approach to moral problems, which lead to a consistency of actions across situations” (Smith and

Show More
Related

Assess The Difference Between Act Materialism And Rule Utilitarianism

321 Words | 2 Pages

The difference between Act Utilitarianism and Rule Utilitarianism is the way they evaluate actions and its consequences. This means that Act Utilitarianism evaluate actions by the consequences of the act by itself, while Rule Utilitarianism evaluate the effect of any action by the amount of good or bad consequences that it cause in general. However, both are based principally in the consequences of the actions either general or specific. In my opinion, the better ethical theory is Rule Utilitarianism because it judge the actions based on the consequences it bring to society in general, and not just the consequences it brings itself.

Read More

Themes Of Utilitarianism In The Bronx Everyone

1252 Words | 6 Pages

113-122. 717–746, https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract2021922140. “University of Pittsburgh Swanson School of Engineering What Is Ethics.” SSoE Home, www.engineering.pitt.edu/subsites/projects/engineering-ethics/what-is-ethics/. Accessed 29 Apr. 2024. The. “Utilitarianism.”

Read More

Comparing Catholic Social Teaching And Biomedical Engineering's Code Of Ethics

451 Words | 2 Pages

There are many commonalities between the Catholic social teachings and the biomedical engineer's code of ethics, due to the fact that they both have a strong focus on the safety and well-being of all people, including both the workers and the consumers. Fundamental rights/responsibilities and workers’ rights are two of the Catholic social teaching themes closely relatable to engineers or scientists in the biomedical engineering field. The first of these themes is related to the basic rights and responsibilities that should be granted to each individual. According to the social teachings, this includes morals, compensation, and being competent in the work one is doing.

Read More

Flaws Of Act Utilitarianism

1778 Words | 8 Pages

Rule-utilitarianism as stated by Smart and William in the book previously mentioned, “is the view that rightness or wrongness of an action is to be judged by the goodness and badness of the consequences of a rule that everyone should perform the action in like circumstances. ”(Smart and Williams 9) Though similar to act-utilitarianism, rule-utilitarianism main difference is that it's about maximizing good/happiness through setting up certain moral codes that contain rules. This allows for supports of rule-utilitarianism to literally have guidelines or rules on how they should live there life. However, this raises many issues one being rule

Read More

Virtue Ethics At Texas A & M University

1227 Words | 5 Pages

From a societal perspective, engineers are generally perceived as technical beings who support society in a concealed fashion, and are often neglected for their contribution beyond their technical nature. This categorization of engineers stem from the mindset that engineering ethics are a set of procedures that designs must be follow. However, this mindset lacks the motivation that will allow engineers to pursue an influential role in the technologically advanced society. Virtue ethics offers a perspective that promotes excellence in character and action towards societal flourishing. Virtues such as curiosity, perseverance, open-mindedness, technical competence, effective communication, awareness to safety, resilience, and courage are all

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Act Utilitarianism

867 Words | 4 Pages

Utilitarianism is a form of consequential theory and has two central branches that I will define and apply to this engineering and environmental disaster. This theory depends only on the consequences of decisions, through consequentialist theories pleasure is seen as the most important outcome. It tests which of the available options would create the most happiness and the least unhappiness. The morally responsible choices are the ones that create the most net pleasure meaning that as long as the positives and pleasures outweigh the negatives and displeasures. One of the key tenants of measuring the positives is to determine the amount of people who will experience pleasure and the depth or intensity of said pleasure.

Read More

Examples Of Hedonism V. S. Mill Rule Utilitarianism

667 Words | 3 Pages

Rule utilitarianism sets rules that utility should be applied to and decisions must conform to said rules to get to the best outcome. Rule utilitarianism is not applied case by case as compared to act. Mill embraces the view of Rule utilitarianism as stated on page 23 “ … proposed by J.S Mill, is to appeal directly to the “first principle” of

Read More

Arguments Against Utilitarianism

1542 Words | 7 Pages

This theory states that the actions that always create maximum utility, thereby founded on experienced situations, should be formed into rules. Therefore, actions are judged in relation to the conformity of these prescribed rules. However, even if a rule is created as to ‘never kill another human being’, utilitarianism would only pursue to exist if and only if each situation was responded to with the consequence of always maximizing utility. In the situation that the rule was always followed, the existence of utilitarianism would be extinguished as there would always be exceptional situations that need the rule to be adjusted and thus, the utilitarian would be obliged to forgo the rule in order for the doctrine to survive. Therefore, rule utilitarianism is used as a faulty appeal to

Read More

Examples Of Act Utilitarianism

403 Words | 2 Pages

Utilitarian is an influential concept which believes that the purpose of morality is to make life higher via growing the amount of fine things (equivalent to pleasure and happiness) on this planet and reducing the quantity of unhealthy matters (comparable to suffering and unhappiness).Rule utilitarian’s suppose that motion is right as it conforms to a rule that leads to the finest just right, or that "the rightness or wrongness of a certain action is a perform of the correctness of the rule of which it is an instance. Act utilitarian supposes that man or woman's act is morally right if and provided that it produces at the least as so much happiness as some other act that the man or woman could participate in at that time. Each act utilitarian’s

Read More

Advantages Of Act Utilitarianism

1494 Words | 6 Pages

There are two main types of utilitarianism: act and rule. Act-utlitarianism is Bentham's version of utilitarianism and operates by taking each situation on its own merits, wishing only to achieve the 'greatest hapiness for the greatest number' (Bentham, 2007) of people involved. There are no general rules, only the situation that applies to the individual. By contrast, for a rule-utilitarian, which is arguably Mill's version of utilitarianism, the greatest good for the greatest number is achieved when everyone follows laws and customs that aim to maximise the happiness of everyone, not just some individuals. Personally, I would assert that rule-utilitarianism has multiple advantages over act-utilitarianism and in this essay I intend to prove

Read More

Rule Utilitarianism

1193 Words | 5 Pages

When discussing both act and rule utilitarianism, it is important to understand that both of them agree in terms of the overall consequence of an action, because they emphasize on creating the most beneficial pleasure and happiness in the outcome of an act. Despite this fact, they both have different principles and rules that make them different from each other. Act utilitarianism concentrates on the acts of individuals. Meaning that if a person commits an action, he/she must at least have a positive utility. The founders of utilitarianism define positive utility as happiness and pleasure and consider it to be a driving force of all positive and morally right acts.

Read More

Examples Of Utilitarianism

414 Words | 2 Pages

Utilitarianism gives too much opportunity for negative things to be done with people saying what they were doing caused them greater happiness rather than the alternative. Following the Utilitarianism gives people the thought they can do anything as long as pleasure is greater than displeasure. Happiness is the key for this ethical principle. For example, stealing something such as a prescription drug to save a life.

Read More

Essay On Rule Utilitarianism

797 Words | 4 Pages

Utilitarians think that happiness is the measure to judge the consequences, whether the action is right or wrong depends almost entirely on the good or bad consequences. Rule utilitarianism argues that if you

Read More

The Concepts Of Traditional Moralism And Traditional Utilitarianism

1162 Words | 5 Pages

Traditional Utilitarianism was generally considered to be founded by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. Utilitarian principles assumes that we can measure and add together the quantities of benefits made by a certain action and then measure and subtract from those benefits the quantities of harm the action will produce. Utilitarian principles states that the right act in a given situation is the one that produces the greatest utilities than another act. The act will only be right if it produces the most utility for all the persons affected by the action, including the person who performed the act. It also states, that not only direct and immediate consequences must be taken into consideration, but also all foreseeable future cost and benefits each alternative will have on each individual.

Read More

Key Concepts Of Utilitarianism

1267 Words | 6 Pages

Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that is more interested in consequences than intent. An act is considered right if it’s good outcomes is more than the bad outcomes. People are expected to act in a way that will result in the greatest possible amount of well-being. Utilitarianism became a well-defined ethical theory during the eighteenth century. Utilitarianism can be described as a theory of ethics because it tells good or bad and also right or wrong.

Read More

More about The ASME Code Of Ethics

Related Topics

Open Document