ipl-logo

The Argument Against Animal Experiment

482 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Argumentative essay on why animal testing

For the view of against animal experiment, it will use the equal consideration theory to argue. Singer (2009) suggests that the principle of the equality is not required the equal or identical treatment, it is required equal consideration. The prerequisite to has equal consideration is the capacity for suffering, and it also is an important characteristic that gives a being the right to equal consideration (Singer 2009; Pojman, 1992). Those who have the ability to feel the pain, no matter it are a human or non-human, they should be morally equal. Therefore, for the same ability to feel pain, it should be given the equal concern and the right to live for the beings. Also according to Singer (2009), if the people want to avoid speciesism, singer suggests the human should allow the beings, who are having similar capacity for suffering, the right to live. The speciesism is the concept similar to racism and sexism. The people who are speciesism, they assume the animal do not feel the same pain as human beings do or think like the human. They also think human interest is more important than animals. It is a discriminate to animals due to the species (Singer, 2009).

In the case CRUK are funded the animal experiment in 2009. The detail of the …show more content…

The researchers do not consider the animal’s capacity for suffering, and they already knew the experiment will cause the animals suffer. After the experiment, the animal suffers pain and the researchers will destroy the animals because they are only the sample in the research. The animal has a very little chance to live. The experiment is exploiting the right of an animal to live. The destroy of the animal sample is treat the animal as a tool, the animals become the substitutes to test for the human being interested, and the test is fatal. It is speciesism. So, it is morally wrong to do aminal

Show More
Related

A Student Shany Sun's Argument In Favor Of Animal Testing

1004 Words | 5 Pages

After Sun reassures readers that the animals are completely safe and pain-free, she is able to reinforce how animal testing is beneficial through sound research. “The truth behind animal testing,” explains how specific discoveries such as insulin, blood transfusions, penicillin, so on and so forth have been unearthed because of animal testing. Today, many people can relate to these medical advances because they are so commonly used in hospitals and the medical field. Sun’s research even introduces multiple cases where animal testing was successful. One such case included Charles Chamberland who was able to find a vaccine for both cholera and anthrax through animal experimentation with little harm to the chickens he was testing.

Read More

Animal Experimentation: The Moral Issue By Robert M.

830 Words | 4 Pages

Numerous people have attempted to justify the use of such methods by putting down or rather, dismissing the animal as a creature lacking the mental capacities to be considered equals to that of a human being. In their book "Animal Experimentation : The Moral Issue" authors Robert M. Baird and Stuart E. Rosenbaum say, "holders of rights must have the capacity to comprehend rules of duty, governing all including themselves" (104). He then goes on to explain that "animals do not have such moral capacities" (Baird 105). And as a result of this "we can't violate their rights because they have none" (Baird 105). Dismissing the animal as nothing more then an object may not seem like the most reasonable defense against the use of animals for testing

Read More

Discuss The Arguments Against Phenomelogical Ethics

446 Words | 2 Pages

The main purpose of this essay is to support my opposition of animal rights by using phenomenological ethics. The meaning of this theory is the ability to see ethical dilemmas through the eyes of the “others.” To apply phenomenological ethics, one must put themselves in someone else’s, and in this instance the animal, or as many consider it, the nonhuman animal’s point of view. I will argue by explaining how phenomenological ethics can teach us to minimize speciesism, realize the pain and suffering animals go through, and why they should be considered a part of the moral community. Speciesism, as explained by Peter Singer is, “…discrimination against nonhuman animals just because of their species,” also saying that, “…it violates the principle of equal consideration-comparable interests” (548).

Read More

Practical Ethics By Peter Singer Defends A Pro-Animal Argument

1945 Words | 8 Pages

In his book Practical Ethics, Peter Singer defends a pro-animal argument. The goal of the argument is not to lower the status of humans, but to elevate the status of animals. He compares the belief that humans should always take precedence over issues about animals to the prejudice of slave owners against their slaves. He states that it is easy to look back and criticize the prejudices of the people who lived back then, but it is much harder to criticize ourselves, our beliefs, and whatever prejudices we may hold and actually try to change them.

Read More

A Change Of Heart About Animals Analysis

627 Words | 3 Pages

I think that scientist and psychologist shouldn’t be able to do unnecessary experiments on animals. The first reason that I think they shouldn’t is because most of the time these animals don’t survive these procedures. It isn’t right to instantly end an animal’s life, as well as its wrong to end a human’s life. On top of these innocent killings us human’s show little to no remorse. Most people believe that animals don’t suffer or feel pain but according to Victoria Braithwaite even fish feel pain.

Read More

Why Animal Experimentation Is Unethical

1066 Words | 5 Pages

Animal experimentation is unacceptable because it is unethical. The article “Animal Experimentation” it states, “many people object to the use of animals in scientific studies because the animals are denied their freedom and often suffer serious injury and discomfort.” People disagree with animal experimentation because the animals do not have the freedom to choose. Animals cannot speak for themselves to tell whether or not they want to get tested on, because of this then the animals that are tested on suffer a lot of discomfort and injuries. Another reason why animal experimentation is unethical because it is unreliable.

Read More

Animal Testing And Cruelty For Animals

223 Words | 1 Pages

The physical suffering and discomfort that animals test subjects experience during research that are frequently faulty, limited, and expensive are the factors that advocates for stronger animal rights fight to end. Each day that an animal is subjected to animal testing is another day that they suffer. The test subjects become nothing but a prisoner to the scientists and researchers. Animals in laboratories are permitted by law to be “burned, shocked, poisoned, isolated, starved, drowned, addicted to drugs, and brain damaged” all for scientific research (“Cruelty to Animals”). As stated prior, once the experiments are over the animals either die or are thrown back into their confined cages or stocks and used for a later experiment.

Read More

Animal Testing Utilitarianism

2744 Words | 11 Pages

Introduction Animals testing have significantly contributed to the advancement of scientific knowledge in general and to biomedical progress specifically. Many example showing that laboratory animals in medical development and other aspects have significantly influenced human health and reduced suffering, for example improved diagnosis of infectious disease (Hau, Jann, Schapiro & Steven, 2002). But since 1960s and 1970s, animals testing protests has gained prominence and strength, people start to argue is it moral to continue “cruel” animal testing. Animal Testing is a Moral Act In the rest of this article, I shall apply different concept under utilitarianism try to discuss whether animal testing are moral acts. It is important to notice that (1) in this article, applying the general idea of utilitarianism which is “the greatest happiness of greatest number” and (2) the animals testing under the rules and regulations.

Read More

Persuasive Essay Why Animal Testing Is Wrong

1111 Words | 5 Pages

Although the experimentation of animals has furthered medical knowledge, it should not be allowed because it is brutal and animals are unable to give their approval. In order to do a study on humans it must be authorized by them, where animals are unable to give consent, which strikes questions in the world of science on whether this is morally acceptable. Although animal experimentation can result in saving the lives of millions, many find it to be cruel and unjust. Seeing as animals are unable to speak for themselves, they are still able to express their emotions through their behavior.

Read More

The Ineffectiveness Of Animal Testing

604 Words | 3 Pages

Animal testing is ineffective, and inhumane because it wastes thousands of

Read More

Arguments Against Animal Testing On Animals

559 Words | 3 Pages

Because… according to University Wire more than 100 million animals are tortured due to experimentation practices, including rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, rats and mice. These experiments include forcing them to eat thing, expose them to radiation, stressful situations, and sometimes getting rid of organs. Therefore…testing on animals is painful, and careless to them. 4.) My opponent says....animals are not humans, and are good for research

Read More

Persuasive Speech Animal Testing

1084 Words | 5 Pages

While viewing animal experiments can be conducted both through the prism of the benefits and the disadvantages, this issue served as a powerful reason for discussions in the society and points out the need for

Read More

Persuasive Animal Testing

686 Words | 3 Pages

Animal Experimentation is a large controversial topic across the United States because of the harm forced upon innocent animals for the benefit of mankind’s health. The use of animals in laboratories is a common occurrence in the medical field, cosmetic industry, and in clothing production. Animals are used in experiments to test the safety, durability, and quality of many everyday products. In order to end these unethical testing methods, society must be informed of the harsh realities that include wasted profit due to expensive testing, unnecessary procedures that lead to inaccurate results, and the mental and physical abuse inflicted upon these innocent animals.

Read More

Should Animal Testing Be Banned

967 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout moral, humanistic, and social perspectives animal testing is beneficial for medical evolution. Animals ' rights are of less moral worth than human rights. Humans are complex beings with large well developed brains, which form sizeable social groups, have significant ability to communicate with one another, and possess desires, preferences and interests about the world. Humans have an awareness of their own existence and mortality, and as such are beings worthy of moral consideration. According to Pycroft (2011), “Without access to live organisms we would know far less bout the function of the cardiovascular, how digestion works…

Read More

Argumentative Essay: Should Animal Testing Be Banned?

859 Words | 4 Pages

Science researches believe that products which have been tested on animals will make humans’ life better. However, the main concern on this issue is that animals are suffering from unnecessary pain. Animals are mostly exposed to radiation, forced to inhale poisonous gases and injected with harmful substances prior to the experiment. Thus, animal testing should be banned because it is cruel, the result is unreliable and expensive.

Read More

More about The Argument Against Animal Experiment

Related Topics

Open Document