ipl-logo

Was The Atomic Bomb Justified

1457 Words6 Pages

World War II is one of the most well-known wars. Over sixty million men died, and about fifty million civilians died. It’s the deadliest war the world has seen. One iconic moment from the war was when the two atomic bombs were dropped on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, on August 6 and 9, 1945 by the Allies. Japan suffered greatly due to these bombs, and they are the main reason for all the civilian deaths. There are many differing opinions on the dropping of these bombs: some believe the bombs were not good for anyone and unjustly killed civilians, while others believe that the bomb ended the war and was worth the consequences. It’s a highly controversial issue, and it was a difficult decision for President Harry Truman. The dropping …show more content…

“Harry S Truman’s Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb” reports, “The temperature near the blast site reached 5,400 degrees Fahrenheit. The sky seemed to explode… People over two miles away burst into crumbling cinders. Others with raw skin hanging in flaps around their hips leaped shrieking into waterways to escape the heat” The atomic bomb caused a lot of destruction. People were gruesomely killed, and it was a terrible thing to watch. The bomb caused such terrible things to happen, it couldn’t have been a good thing. For example, 80,000 people were killed directly after the atomic bomb was dropped, and 35,000 were injured. By the end of the year, another 60,000 were dead due to effects of the atomic bomb (Harry S Truman’s Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb). In total, about 140,000 people were dead one year after the bomb was dropped from the effects of the atomic warfare. The bomb may have ended the war, but the results were horrific. It wasn’t worth it to end the lives of so many innocents. Certainly, the atomic bombs were not justified because they killed thousands of …show more content…

Yes. The bombs successfully ended World War II and saved millions of lives that might have been lost if the war continued. In war, you have to make hard decisions. When it comes down to it, the only thing you can really do is try your best to save as many of your people as you can. President Truman did what he thought was best: bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki. There are no innocent in war, and in order to win, risks have to be taken. If you were in President Truman’s place, what would you do? If the bombs hadn’t been dropped, the world would look a lot different than it does now. Japan might have won the war without the atomic bombs! So many people were thankful for the dropping of the bombs, because even though they killed civilians, their lives were saved from almost certain suicide. Definitely, dropping the atomic bombs in World War II was

Show More
Related
301 Words | 2 Pages

As stated in document A, President Truman believed that it was his duty as president to use every weapon available to save American lives. By making the decision to employ atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, it successfully brought an end to World War II. Now, while these bombs did ultimately spare thousands of American lives, it did also put an end to about 200,000 lives as shown in document E. Document A stated that Admiral William Leahy, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, opposed using the bomb because it killed civilians indiscriminately. He believed that an economic blockade and conventional bombing would convince Japan to surrender. As an opposite end of the spectrum though Truman’s advisor, James Byrnes thought that the use of “the A-bombs would not only cause Japan to surrender, but also impress the Soviet Union, and hopefully stop its expansion” (Doc C).

Read More
424 Words | 2 Pages

The Bombing of Hiroshima The bombing of Hiroshima was the right thing to do due to the military lives that were going to be lost if the bomb did not get dropped, America also wanted to impress Russia or intimidate them by dropping it and the president saw this opportunity to make japan surrender as well. This all supports the main point on why it was the right thing to do but many to all Japanese say otherwise Lots of soldiers lost their lives because of the conflict with japan, in document B, it states,”123,000 Japanese and Americans killed each other”. Paul Fussell, a WWII soldier also stated, ”war is immoral, war is cruel”. This is speaking for all the soldiers in the war or most of them, this also means that he doesn’t like war and it would

Read More
697 Words | 3 Pages

Yes, it did prevent others from dying, and no, it killed hundreds of thousands innocent people. So the bombing of Hiroshima is both justified and not justified. The first point you could make is yes, the bomb was 100 percent justified and it was a good idea. War is an awful thing that our world has to go through, because many die and lots of land is damaged. An article that agrees the bomb was good claims, “On Okinawa, only a few weeks before Hiroshima, 123,000 JApanese and Americans killed each other.

Read More
882 Words | 4 Pages

The United States and Japan fought in World War II during 1941 to 1945. Japan planned to expand their land and gain resources- which led them to invade China whom was an ally of the U.S. In result, the United States cut off the supply of oil to Japan. On December 7th 1941, Japan’s air force did a surprise attack on Pearl Harbor because that is where their military base is located.

Read More
345 Words | 2 Pages

The dropping of the bombs were necessary and fair due to the refusal of the Japanese to surrender, the millions of lives saved by a quick end to the war, and the warnings given to the Japanese. To begin, the Japanese soldiers have it ingrained in their brains that it is dishonorable to surrender. The author of Drop the Bomb as agreed by saying that “the Japanese have demonstrated a willingness to fight to the death”. During the war there were many times for the Japanese to surrender, but it was never done. With this in mind, they would have continued to drag out the war, which shows that dropping the bombs sped up the war which lessened the casualties.

Read More
685 Words | 3 Pages

Similarly, the bombs were available for us to use instead of wasting millions of other weapons. Another quote by Colonel Paul Tibbets, Jr. says, “It would have been morally wrong if we'd have had that weapon and not used it and let a million more people die.” Ultimately, the bombs saved people from the raging war that could've gone on for an extended amount of time. More lives were saved with the bombs with almost no use of weapons along with less

Read More
852 Words | 4 Pages

In the twentieth century, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, which were the most powerful weapons at that time, on Japan. It happened on August 6 and August 9, 1945. The atomic bombs killed 226,000 Japanese and ended the war. However, America should not have dropped the atomic bombs for two reasons. First, it was not necessary to drop the bomb to win the war militarily or to get the Japanese to surrender.

Read More
985 Words | 4 Pages

Four years later into the war the United States on August 6, 1945 dropped the world’s first arranged atomic bomb over Hiroshima in Japan. The explosion distributed through ninety percent of the city and instantly killed 80,000 people. Thousands of innocent lives would later die from radiation exposure. Without any hesitation three days later, the second bomb was released into Japan this time in Nagasaki, terminating roughly 40,000 people (Staff, History.com, 2015). This being said I would like to start off by saying that I think it is just incredibly terrible how far war can take a nation into the brink of having no other choice but leading into the manslaughter of thousands of people.

Read More
1838 Words | 8 Pages

Soon the U.S was attacked by Japan. The President then decided to drop the atomic bomb to end this war and quickly. The use of the atomic bomb on Japan was justified because it ended the war, was a better alternative than the others given, and helped save lives. The atomic bomb used on Japan was justified because it ended the war.

Read More
1116 Words | 5 Pages

In 1945, World War Two, a six year conflict, ended in the adoption of firebombing tactics, and ultimately the dropping of two atomic bombs. These two bombs dropped on the Japanese cities of Nagasaki and Hiroshima devastated thousands, killing and wounding 75,000 and 150,000 people respectively. At the time this decision was one supported by many because after years of fighting they believed it would save more American lives, and prevent the need for more face to face combat between the Allied Powers and the Axis powers, which at this point only consisted of Japan. However, years after the end of World War Two many historians have analyzed the motives behind this decision. Many believe the traditional orthodox argument that dropping these

Read More
994 Words | 4 Pages

World War II introduced the most dangerous weapon in the world, the atomic bomb. When the US used it on Japan we went to far and caused unnecessary damage to the people. Many people believe this to the only truth but, the real truth is that dropping the atomic bomb was a necessary evil we had to use in order to win the war in World War II and future wars to come. It save many american soldiers lives, stopped the Soviets from joining, and helped us win against Japan. First and foremost, World War II caused many casualties for both sides of the war.

Read More
1840 Words | 8 Pages

Was America Justified in dropping the atom bomb on Hiroshima in August 1945? On August 6th, 1945 at 8:16 AM, a great yet horrific event in history occurred. This event is known as the dropping of the atom bomb on the city of Hiroshima, Japan, the event that would begin and end the pain and suffering of millions. The atom bomb was dropped by an American B-29 Superfortress bomber named Enola Gay and

Read More
581 Words | 3 Pages

President Harry Truman gave an executive order in 1945 to drop to atomic bombs in popular downtown cities in Japan. With the guidance of many scientists and political leaders President Truman made the extremely tough decision to drop the bombs. After listening to arguments from both sides President Truman came to the conclusion that dropping bombs would be the best thing to do for this war. It would also show that the United States had an extreme military power. Many American politicians were for the idea of dropping the bomb, because they believed that it was the only way to end the war and get Japan to surrender.

Read More
785 Words | 4 Pages

Even though they have killed millions of people, millions more would have been killed if they were not dropped. There was an estimated number between 250,000 and 1 million American lives that were lost, but there were a larger number for the Japanese also due to an invasion. The atomic bomb had its good and bad things about it. It was learned that German scientists had been able to split the uranium atom and it was able to release enormous amounts of energy. After German scientists had split the uranium atom and found out it could release extremely large amounts of energy, they had theories that would work to make an atomic bomb.

Read More
311 Words | 2 Pages

As all the world has known, the biggest atomic bomb in warfare history by the end of World War 2 is the bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima that hit on August 9th, 1945 by the direct order of our 33rd president of The United States Of America; Harry S. Truman. He thought this bomb would bring a close ending of the war (World War 2) and it definitely did but it was too much to handle afterwards when it hit. There was no choice for Truman because there was no other way to bring the war into a close. It was the last call, but they didn’t realize that after they released the bomb, it was hard to decide whether it was a mistake or the right decision. The bomb killed innocent people of 199,000 (plus more).

Read More

More about Was The Atomic Bomb Justified

Related Topics

Open Document