ipl-logo

The Impetus For Change In The United States Army

1197 Words5 Pages

Impetus for Change
Author’s Name
Institutional Affiliations

Introduction
The most consistent thing in the world today is change. Change is inevitable and is good both for individuals and organizations. However, just because everything is different in an organization or at the personal level does not mean that anything has changed. Change can be positive or negative, but unfortunately, change usually brings with it undesirable consequences. Notably, change is often poised upon the less powerful in the society or an organization. Change can be a positive and life-sustaining process that people initiate and sustain depending on the overall objective of bringing change. Every organization whether big or small is affected by changes …show more content…

One of the organizations that have been heavily affected is the United States army, especially after the September 11 attacks. With the invasion of Afghanistan and months later Iraq, the wars have forced the Pentagon to rethink the ways to fight these wars, how it burns through cash in times of emergency and what it esteems in both its most noteworthy and least positioning officers. One of the major changes in the army was how the United States military fights on the ground. For many years, the United States Army was fighting a fierce and robust insurgency. The army was simply fighting the remnants of Saddam Hussein’s regime. However, the Pentagon has implemented and embraced changes in the war where they are strongly supporting counterinsurgency warfare. As a result, the Pentagon feels that the United States army cannot simply kill their way to victory but rather should focus on winning the hearts and minds of the local people who can support them in the war. Despite the fact that this kind of change and approach to war can be an expense and may take long to win the battle, the Pentagon is determined to save as many lives as possible which is essential to the rebuilding of Afghanistan and …show more content…

However, there are different changes models that can be adopted by organizations depending on the industry and the nature of the change being implemented. In this case, the Pentagon decided to utilize the Lewin’s change management model to monitor the success of the operation changes (Buono & Jamieson, 2010). According to Lewin, to have a successful change in an organization, the change has to go through three different steps that include unfreezing, change and refreezing. Besides, the management or the leadership of the organization must understand why the change must take place and how the change must take

Show More
Related
864 Words | 4 Pages

DISCUSSING ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE Lisa Thai HRMT-440 Colorado Technical University 4/18/2018 Business organizations in the industry are always experiencing changes in the business environment. This forces them to change their operations hence in order to coup with the changing business environment (Fletcher, 2004). The technology keeps on advancing hence the need for business enterprises to adopt the use of it in order to boosts its performance in the industry. Organizations that perform well in the industry starts to grow in size hence expanding their operations in the industry. The increase in size of a firm requires it to makes certain changes in its operations in order to incorporate the growth in its operations.

Read More
1542 Words | 7 Pages

On July 30, 2008, a bloody battle involving Coalition forces took place in the mountainous eastern Afghan province of Nuristan. This was the Battle of Wanat and the devastating amount of Coalition casualties began a vigorous investigation by the United States Army. The village of Wanat, defended by Second Platoon, Chosen Company, Second Battalion, 503rd Infantry Regiment, 173rd Airborne Brigade Combat Team would fall victim to numerous bad decision made by higher command. Although the men of Chosen Company fought hard, they ended up surrounded, vastly outnumbered, and without any Battalion assets. This paper will argue the reasons for the disastrous outcome of the Battle of Wanat; examining the effective company leadership exploiting effective

Read More
1069 Words | 5 Pages

https://doi.org/10.2991/mplg-ia-19.2019.24 Greentree, T. (2021). What went wrong in Afghanistan? The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters, 51(4), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.55540/0031-1723.3088 Kugler, R. (2007). Operation anaconda in Afghanistan: A Case Study of Adaptation in Battle.

Read More
1348 Words | 6 Pages

Accessing Operation Anaconda Case Study Using Mission Command Principles Operation Anaconda was a very pivotal moment in the conflict in Afghanistan and how the American Military structured itself. In learning lessons about the importance of using mission command principles when conducting large-scale operations, the American Military made significant changes to the way they conduct large-scale operations. The operation has several elements that are both good and bad for every Soldier to learn from and understand. While Commanders and Soldiers should be able to adapt to any situation, command elements are essential to the success of a mission because the Commanders intent cannot be to vague or so detailed that the mission cannot be performed,

Read More
763 Words | 4 Pages

Operation Anaconda was a crucial military campaign carried out in early 2002 and made its mark in history as a major turning point in the post 9/11 era. The competence and effectiveness of their Command-and-Control actions during this time led to a successful and impactful mission. This analysis will dissect certain details of the operation and allow us to gain insight on how the success of the operation was achieved using the principles of mission command. Analyzing Operation Anaconda compels a “Worthy Appraisal” of the principles of mission command that guided the military decision-making during the complex operation. During our analysis of Operation Anaconda, we will evaluate all seven of the useful principles and appraise these principles for

Read More
387 Words | 2 Pages

Operation Anaconda, conducted in March 2002, was a major military campaign aimed at destroying Taliban and al-Qaeda forces in the Shahikot Valley of Afghanistan. The operation presented a complex and challenging environment for the U.S. and coalition forces, requiring the application of the principles of mission command. This essay will analyze and evaluate the significant points of Operation Anaconda Case Study, focusing on the principles of mission command and how they were utilized to achieve the operation's objectives (Kugler, 2007). The success of Operation Anaconda can be attributed to the practical application of mission command principles, which allowed for adaptability, coordination, and communication between ground and air forces,

Read More
2403 Words | 10 Pages

For GEN McChrystal, leading all coalition forces in Afghanistan proved to be a challenging task that involved persistent relationship-building with Afghan political leaders and NATO forces. The general developed a strategy that involved deploying more troops to the region to combat the growing Taliban threat and doing so required convincing Congress and the many NATO countries. The general failed to mitigate and accepted the risk of undermining presidential authority while serving as the ISAF commander. The challenges associated with invading a country, occupying it, and living amongst its population to rebuild it are the very basis of COIN operations. GEN McChrystal and his staff deliberately leaked his strategy to involve more troops in the conflict to gain public traction and force a negative perception of the Obama administration and their perspective on the war in Afghanistan.

Read More
1015 Words | 5 Pages

Operation Anaconda in Afghanistan: A Case Study of Adaption in Battle Operation Anaconda was conducted in Shahikot Valley of Afghanistan during early March of 2002. The operation was originally estimated to be a three-day battle but lasted 17 days with heavy scene of fighting for the first seven days. The mission of Operation Anaconda was to remove the assembled Taliban and al Qaeda forces out of the valley. The battleground took place in a rough terrain surround by mountains that made it complex for modern warfare technology and tactics. The United States had to adapt to the environment and change their tactics that involves joint operations and advanced information network.

Read More
1180 Words | 5 Pages

The Operations Process (ADP 5-0). https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/ARN18126-ADP_5-0-000-WEB-3.pdf Grant, R. (2005, February 7). Operation Anaconda: An Airpower Perspective. https://www.defense.gov/. Retrieved May 7, 2023, from https://media.defense.gov/2014/Sep/17/2001329845/-1/-1/0/anaconda%2n.d.A495248.pdf Kugler, R., & Kugler, R. L. (2007). Operation Anaconda in Afghanistan: a case study of adaptation in battle.

Read More
1050 Words | 5 Pages

Accessing Operation Anaconda Case Study Using Mission Command Principles Operation Anaconda was a very pivotal moment for the conflict in Afghanistan and how the American Military structured itself. In the process of learning lessons about the importance of using mission command principles when conducting large-scale operations, the American Military made significant changes to the way they conduct large-scale operations. The operation has several elements that are both good and bad for every Soldier to learn from and understand. Using the mission command principles commanders’ intent, mutual trust, and disciplined initiative. I will analyze what went right, wrong, and what could have been prevented in the 17-day operation.

Read More
772 Words | 4 Pages

This battle, which lasted for two weeks and involved US and Afghan forces engaging with members of the Taliban and al-Qaeda, is seen as a turning point in the war, with the US-led coalition ultimately driving the enemy forces out of the valley (Kugler, 2007). The battle was significant in that it demonstrated the effectiveness of US-led coalition forces in a mountainous terrain and against a determined enemy. The coalition forces employed air strikes and ground troops to drive out the enemy, and the success of this strategy was evident in the outcome of the battle. Furthermore, Operation Anaconda demonstrated the importance of collaboration between US and Afghan forces, with the latter playing an important role in the battle. The battle also highlighted the need for US and Afghan forces to carefully consider the terrain and environment when engaging with the enemy.

Read More
951 Words | 4 Pages

First, the Organizational concept of Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan failed from the beginning because of organizational structure set up. Political problems caused the operation to suffer CENTCOM’s Naval

Read More
2528 Words | 11 Pages

How Sustainment Operations Affect the Contemporary Operational Environment MSG Bradley Toles Sergeants Major Course Class 73 SGM Delain & SGM Estes 2 April 2023 How Sustainment Operations Affect the Contemporary Operational Environment With the various global conflicts, United States (US) Army forces must be ready to conduct sustainment operations in the contemporary operational environment (COE). Operational environments consist of conditions that can influence decisions that commanders make. Operational environments consist of variables that have regional and global influences that can affect operations in theater. Some trends can affect operations, such as failing states, globalization, urbanization, and technological

Read More
1336 Words | 6 Pages

Reliance on external militant friendly forces attributed to several significant mission command weaknesses. Competence, mutual trust, and shared understanding were principles that almost prevented the United States' victory in this case. Upon reflection, these are lessons learned and “serve as a cautionary tale for Americans convinced that our technological superiority is a foolproof defense against the element of surprise in the mountains of Afghanistan, the streets of Baghdad or on any other future battlefield” (Naylor, 2003). Successful completion of the “Hammer and Anvil” method was reliant on the competence of friendly Afghan forces, who ultimately were unorganized, untrained, and operated under their authority (Kugler, 2007).

Read More
485 Words | 2 Pages

If we want Unconventional Warfare (UW) to be successful, many entities must invest. The investment is initially paid through the educational foundation and vested interest of SOF (including SF personnel and support enablers), policy makers (including top Army officials and political officials), and the Intelligence Community (IC). SOF works on the tactical level of a mission, but their influence can reach to the staff (division) level of a resistance movement or insurgency. Since we are the bottom branch of the totem pole, we see and hear the pulse of a resistance. I believe we may have problems hearing this pulse due to 15 years of relentless war where we honed our ability to teach small unit tactics while disregarding the roles of the underground and auxiliary through preparation of the environment.

Read More

More about The Impetus For Change In The United States Army

Related Topics

Open Document