In Cleveland, Ohio there was a fire that occurred on June 22, 1969, around 12pm on the Cuyahoga river. People called it the “burning river”. The river caught on fire because there were floating pieces of debris that was slicked with oil. The debris ignited by sparks that came from a train that was passing over the river. The reason it happened is from years of people dumping pollution into the river.
Chrissy Yao's essay on the Denver Water Conservation Campaign: "Use Only What You Need", skillfully described and analyzed said campaign. The campaign was created in order to lower the average water consumption of the city, so as to help alleviate the water crisis in the city. She begins with a similair description of the campaign and it's goals, and then goes on to explian how, in addition to the typical billboard advertising and magazine ads one would expect, the advertising campaign also utilized less conventional visual metaphors, such as a stripped down used car, or a bench with most of the base and back taken away so that it ony has just enough room for one person to sit. Yao analyzes the bench in particular as an innovative and minimalistic
In "Natural Bridge/Rogue River Canyon," Paul Halupa draws a picture of two dominate forces, a wall of lava and a river. Both the lava and the river are metaphors, lava being the inevitable end of life and the river is the present life that is unstoppable; raging towards the lava. Halupa overall tone isn't sad, but understanding. He understands that people work hard all their life; moving fast and not appreciating how short life is. Halupa’s poem expresses the human condition is like a match, it has an explosive start, then stays consistent till it slows down and burns out.
This challenge was brought up again in the Edwards Aquifer v. Day case, showing a pattern in public opinion of property rights being violated. The resulting case decision is discussed as well. This source further develops the knowledge present by discussing the current Texas water and property laws; the discussion includes opinions from water conservation districts and facts about the history of certain law creations. A general sense of Texas law and its history is produced through reading this
Water is important to both of the states. “Both states should be able to grow, have strong economies, have clean water supplies, and have a healthy river system” (Samuel). Samuel appeals to logos and pathos by making the reader consider the options of how to fairly distribute water because everyone should have the water they need. The states need to compromise and conserve water more efficiently to ensure the future of their water
( Document F) Since the government has not raised the prices, I feel that the citizens aren't aware of how much water they truly consume. If they raided the price, I feel that Citizens would be more cautious about using water. I also feel that the government should put a limit on how much water a citizen can use. If they cap at a certain amount everyone would have enough water to
Over the past years Native Americans had cared for their own sacred lands, the story and religion that their primogenitors had taught them. The Native Americans had still carried the strong belief, that their land shall stay the same as if it should've been until new people had come in from elsewhere to change the land to something we all see outside till this day. However, there is a new project “The Dakota Access Pipeline” that had crossed the line of Native American trust between the new people that had changed everything the Natives had had since their ancestors were still living. No matter what effect the pipeline puts on most people there are some positive causes that can change a person such as protesters to think positive towards the pipeline being built on Indian reservation land. Even if the pipeline can cause many people to have a thought that the pipeline should not be built, only if they can hear from both sides, they can have a second thought and allow the pipeline to be built.
Initial federal permits, and partnership with affected tribes, were treated as a “check the box” exercise. Nowhere was there a careful analysis of how much the Missouri River crossing threatened water quality and tribal treaty rights. Nowhere was there a thoughtful public discussion of whether a new major oil pipeline should be placed in a river providing drinking water to 17 million people. And one had to pore over hundreds of pages of technical data to learn that the original route of the pipeline crossed the river just north of Bismarck, N.D. — a capital city that is nearly 90 percent white — and was moved to Standing Rock only when regulators expressed concern over the risk of a spill to the city’s water
This year has been really hectic, with protests and elections alike. Something that had to do with the protests part is the Dakota Access Pipeline, or DAPL. Most people would probably think that the Dakota Access Pipeline is just another pipeline, like the Alaska pipeline, except, it's not just another pipeline. The reason why DAPL is important is because of the fact that it is running over ancient indian land, and not only that it is going over their water source. The clean water the Sioux once had could be gone in just a few months with DAPL going over the standing rock’s water (Michael Bennet).
The Pipe Dreams Documentary shows the vast amount of struggle and determination it takes for farmers to win their own land back. It shares a controversial issue on the construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline. “It’s just like a diamond in the world, the Ogallala Aquifer isn’t just Nebraska, it isn’t just the United States, it’s a clean and big lake” states Cornelius Murphy a rancher in Stuart, Nebraska. TransCanada has been requesting the US government for the approval of a 7 billion dollar pipeline known as the Keystone XL. This pipeline would be used to ship heavy crude oil from Hardisty, Alberta to around the Gulf Coast of Mexico.
As the quote says “Reclamation purchased the property of the local irrigation and ditch companies and maintained their operation until the project could supply water.” This showed that even before the project water wasn’t available to even begin the task. The laborers also had a hard time controlling the Colorado River as it states in the
http://www.denverpost.com/ci_26985185/colorados-land-grab.
I find this unjust for many reasons. First off, you are taking thousands of acres of land that belong to someone else and forcing them to move to a place where they are only given a few acres. Then, after they are removed, you take their businesses, farms, and property.
In the 1950s people of different races didn’t have equal rights. Thanks to the civil rights movements of Dr. Martin Luther King,. Jr. and his famous “I Have A Dream” speech that’s not how it is today. People may wonder how something that happened more than 50 years ago can still be affecting people today. I’ll say that for a fact, his movement has shaped my life.
Cutting off water supply to the lower part that enters country A and diverting it to the lowest part that enters back into country B would ensure they would have complete control of the rivers water. In the second scenario country B would go to war with country A leading to deaths, casualties and all the hardship that comes with a war, but could untimely lead to full control of the river without the time-consuming task of building a dam and diversion of
