ipl-logo

The Mabo Case: Aboriginals And Torres Strait Islanderss

733 Words3 Pages

On June 3 1992, the legal decision of the Mabo case was made by the High Court, the highest court in Australia’s legal system (Webb, 2008). For thousands of years before the arrival of the British in 1788, Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders have had their strong connection to the Australian Land. When the British arrived in 1788, it was declared that the country was terra nullius (land belonging to nobody), which resulted to the absence of recognition towards the connection between the Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders and the Australian land. The declaration of terra nullius also resulted to the British taking land without agreement or payment towards the indigenous Australians (Webb, 2008).

In the 1970s the Queensland Government …show more content…

Eddie Mabo argued that the people of Mer have settled in stable communities, had their own organizations such as political organizations and social organizations and have continuously inhabited and had owned these lands, aiming to win his second case (www.australiatogether.org.au). When the High Court made their legal decision on June 3 1992, the rights over Australian land changed for the Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders. The court’s decision stated that terra nullius should not have been applied to Australia (www.reconciliation.org.au). Their decision also recognized that the Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders have rights to the land as it is acknowledged that they have a unique connection to their land (www.reconciliation.org.au). The high court also recognized the principal of the native title. This means that the high court recognized that there was title to land before the arrival of the European Settlers …show more content…

This is an act that acknowledges the rights to land for the Torres Straight Islanders and Aboriginals because of their traditional laws and customs (www.reconciliation.org.au). It accepts the notion of native title in law and also recognizes the rights of the owners of freehold property. However, the rights to this law are not limitless; it all depends on the traditional laws and customs of the people claiming the title (www.reconciliation.org.au). The interests in, or right to the land from other people are also relevant. This also rules over the Native Title (www.reconciliation.org.au). Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders have to prove their connection to the land and prove that they have not done anything to break their connection to their land such as selling the land (www.reconciliation.org.au). There are different ways to look at the Native Title as some Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders may be granted the right to live on the land and live as how they traditionally lived (www.reconciliation.org.au). The Native Title act is important because it determines how Native Title interests are formally documented and acknowledged (www.reconciliation.org.au). It sets the rules for dealing with land where native title still exists or may exist

Show More
Related
767 Words | 4 Pages

After 10 long years Torres Strait Islander Eddie ‘Koiki’ Mabo has lead indigenous Australians to a victory over the Queensland government. This win this case is a historical moment, as of yesterday, the indigenous Australians have been recognised as the owners of Murray Island. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders are known to have resided in Australia, 40,000 to 60,000 years before the British arrived in 1788. When the British took over they decided to take all the land for themselves even though the indigenous Australians were here first. This court case recognises indigenous Australians unique connection to the land and acknowledges that they have the rights to the land.

Read More
902 Words | 4 Pages

The Mabo decision changed the legal, political and social relationships between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people. In recognising the traditional rights of Murray Islanders it changed Australia forever. The Mabo decision opened the doors for other indigenous people and groups to be able to claim ownership of land. They were required to prove that they had continuous connection to the land and maintained their traditional associating with it. The 'native title ' is the recognition by law that some aboriginal and torres strait islander people have rights to certain land due to their traditional laws and customs.

Read More
370 Words | 2 Pages

The Mabo Decision was the turning point for the recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander rights. Firstly, the Mabo Decision was significant because the decision was the lead up to the recognition of Aboriginal Rights. The Mabo Decision was the movement that made everyone fully recognise the Aboriginal people as humans, and official citizens of the country. The Decision also raised awareness to the discrimination the Aboriginal people were facing before the referendum.

Read More
720 Words | 3 Pages

This was all through the persistency of the protesting and riots. It as was stated by the Australian government “The Aboriginal Land Rights Act. The Aboriginal Land Rights (Northern Territory) Act 1976 was the first attempt by an Australian government to legally recognize the Aboriginal system of land ownership and put into law the concept of inalienable freehold title. The Land Rights Act is a fundamental piece of social reform.” (History Of Land Rights Acts , n.d.)

Read More
1740 Words | 7 Pages

The Commonwealth was completely unprepared, and as the Mabo story gained traction, apathy started to fade away, knocking down any political policy the government had set out to conquer at the beginning of its term. On 3 June, 1992, the High Court of Australia rejected the doctrine of terra nullius and recognised Indigenous land rights for the first time. In doing so, the Commonwealth had admitted that the Indigenous peoples had lived in Australia for thousands of years, that their land had slowly dissolved into the colonies as they grew, underwriting the Australian identity. This lack

Read More
1583 Words | 7 Pages

Here, the Aboriginal Protection Act 1869 (VIC) was made to establish an inclusive scheme of control over the lives of First Australians (Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies, 2014). New South Wales’ equivalent to this was the Aborigines Protection Act 1909 (NSW) which was to provide protection and care of Aboriginal People but rather legislated for the control of their lives. The policies of assimilation directly related to and relied on segregation and protectionism policies. This policy reflected the views of all governmental bodies of Australia, in that they thought it necessary that Aboriginal people were to eventually exercise the equivalent method of living as non-Indigenous Australians and to live as members of a sole community appreciating the same rights and freedoms, accept the same responsibilities, observing similar duties and be predisposed to the same loyalties, hopes and

Read More
1125 Words | 5 Pages

As stated in the handout given in class, “The referendum provided a vehicle for change by empowering the Commonwealth to protectionism and assimilation.” Before the referendum, the States of Australia made laws which discriminated against and denied basic human rights such as being free to live where they wish, having access to education, receiving the same wages as non-Aboriginal people, etc. to Aboriginal people. The referendum did not guarantee such change — For the first five years after the referendum the Australian Government did not make any significant changes, as the referendum did not actually give the government full responsibility to make positive changes for Aboriginal people, it simply “opened the door for Australian Government involvement” as put by the Australian Constitution and 1967 Referendum Fact Sheet. The ongoing political commitment would be the only way to make sure the changes stayed in place; Something that fell short 50 years

Read More
681 Words | 3 Pages

Bringing Them Home Report Today, our society live freely by following our right and freedom, our rights to do and our freedom to say. However, Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders suffered and are still suffering through a long journey to be accepted in Australia as one. Different events occurred during the 90s to today, such as the Mabo decision, referendums and protests. The Bringing Them Home report was a significant event for the civil rights of Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islander people. The Bringing Them

Read More
441 Words | 2 Pages

Mabo: The Mabo case was a judgment in the High Court of Australia in 1992 affirming that Aboriginal people could still have rights to land taken by settlers. Wik: The Wik decision was a legal judgment made in Australia in 1996 that protects the right of Aboriginal people to own land. However, it stated that Native Title could co-exist with other rights on land under pastoral lease but, if there is a conflict between Native Title and lease, the rights of the leaseholder will

Read More
185 Words | 1 Pages

Both Australia and the United States have experienced difficulties relating to racial equality over the years. While both countries have demonstrated a commitment to addressing these racial equality issues, Australia’s commitment has been stronger. This is proved by Australia’s Racial Discrimination Act of 1975, which prohibits “any act involving a distinction, exclusion, restriction or preference based on race, colour, descent or national or ethnical origin which has the purpose of effect of nullifying or impairing the recognition, enjoyment or exercise, on an equal footing, of any human right or fundamental freedom”. Whenever a large event is held in Australia, there is someone acknowledging the traditional owners of the land that they are

Read More
1190 Words | 5 Pages

Abstract Being an aborigine in a white dominated society is a complicated identity. Australia, one of the white governed nations, also owns many aboriginal tribes. They lived harmonious lives in the early period. But European colonization has made a profound effect on the lives of Aboriginals in Australia, which led to the total demolition of their native culture, identity and history. As a result the new generation Aboriginals have lost their Aboriginal heritage and have been accepted neither by Aboriginals nor by whites.

Read More
696 Words | 3 Pages

The fighting which took place between 1788 and 1934 was to claim aboriginal land in the name of the King of England to set up a new colony. This has created ongoing problems between the modern day aboriginals and the government. In the mid twentieth century aboriginals had to work very hard to be accepted as people living in this country and be included in the constitution. Even today there are people who work to get aboriginals fully recognised as the first people of

Read More
1329 Words | 6 Pages

Crucial civil liberties such as employment, custody of kids and management over private property were removed, which indicates that Aboriginal people were subject to just about entire control. British peoples ' focal aspiration of complete power is further depicted when Broome (2010, p.173) argues that the Boards wanted to reject Aboriginality altogether when it declined to acknowledge any Aboriginal people as Indigenous within Victoria. The effort to completely disregard or eliminate the Aboriginal way of life would have produced severe social impacts such as emotional and psychological pain; consequentially resulting in a sense of alienation and a loss of social identity. The rejection and isolation of the Aborigines from mainstream society strongly signifies that the actions used by Aboriginal Protection Boards were attempts to dispossess,

Read More
491 Words | 2 Pages

The marginalization of Australian Aboriginal people was first illustrated when they were not recognized in the census only to exclude them from bureaucrat population figures, as stated in the Constitution (Scheele, 2010). The aboriginal people were confiscated from their homelands and relocated in compounds or townships that disrupted cultural roots, traumatized several generations, and mixed incompatible clans. Once Aboriginal people were migrated, systematized discrimination ensured they were barred from the schools, public facilities and residential areas utilized by the non-Indigenous people (Malcolm, Alexandra, & Michael,

Read More
1176 Words | 5 Pages

Britain was the biggest colony power in the world. Even the fall of the First Empire did not discourage the British from further colonization of ‘’unknown lands’’. In 1770, Captain James Cook claimed a portion of the Australian continent in the name of King George III. On his journey from Botany Bay to Cape York, Cook recorded several interactions with the indigenous population of Australia. Despite knowing about the continent being inhabited by one of the Earth’s oldest civilizations, Great Britain considered Australia terra nullius - land belonging to no one.

Read More

More about The Mabo Case: Aboriginals And Torres Strait Islanderss

Related Topics

Open Document