Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Stanley milgrams experiment
Stanley milgrams experiment
Stanley milgrams experiment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Stanley milgrams experiment
Stanley milgrams experiment
Stanley milgrams experiment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Stanley milgrams experiment
In the video of the Stanley Milgram Experiment People were given roles as teachers and students. The students had been hooked up to an electrical system were they had been received questions and whenever they had answered incorrectly they received a dosage of electricity and got progressively got stronger each time they were wrong. At a certain point the student stopped responding to pain and the scientist had kept making them give a voltage. Some People discontinued the experiment.
After reading multiple sources, it is clear that people tend to blindly listen to authority figures, which leads to dehumanization. Proof that blindly listening to authority figures leads to dehumanization shows in the Milgram Experiment by Saul McLeod on paragraph 15 when it says "Ordinary people are likely to follow orders given by authority figures even to the extent of killing an innocent human being. Basically, McLeod is saying that it is our human nature to listen to authority. When it says "killing an innocent human" and "ordinary people are likely to follow orders" we can see that people are listening to authority figures. This proves that blindly listening to authority leads to dehumanization because they aren't looking at the subject
In the experiment, Milgram uses purposeful deception as the teacher is the naive subject and is told they are participating in a memory and learner psychology experiment and are in charge of delivering shocks to the learner, who, in fact, is an actor. The majority of the participants in the study were obedient to the experimenter even though the experimenter "did not threaten the subjects with punishments such as loss of income, community ostracism or jail for failure to obey. Neither could he offer incentives" (Milgram 651). Despite having nothing to gain, the subjects continued participating in the experiment. The participants continued to administer shocks to the student because they were instructed to
During the 1960’s Stanley Milgram conducted a series of experiments to test how a person reacts to authority. He started these tests in response to World War Two and the reports of the German soldiers who claimed they were “just following orders’ when asked about
He saw that the more personal, or close, the real participant had to be to the fake one, while they were being shocked, affected the obedience as well. He also noticed that if there were two other fake participants teaching that refused to shock their learners that the real participant would not comply. Finally, he tested the experimenter telling the real patient to shock the learner by telephone, instead of actually being there in person, reduced obedience as well (McLead). The Milgram experiment and the Nuremburg trials can relate extensively to explain how the Holocaust happened the way it did.
Jerry M Burger's replication in 2009 of Stanley Milgram's Obedience study (1963, 1965 and 1974) specifically experiment 5, attempted to recreate this controversial and influential research whilst avoiding the ethical issues that the original study brought into play. How close was this to the original? What are the parts of the original that Burger was unable to recreate? Did these alterations effect the results when compared to Milgram's? What follows is my selection and explanation of key similarity’s, those components of Burger's that match Milgram's, and major differences, where Burger's replication deviated from Milgram's methods.
The learner would be the person receiving electroshock from a machine ranging from 15 to 450 volts of electricity. The teacher was the person administering the dosage of electricity to the learner every time he would answer a question wrong. The test was rigged so that the learner would answer
1. Stanley Milgram's conclusions in regards to his experiment were that 84% of the participants reported they were glad they were a part of the study and 1% regretted participating. Also, Milgram's participants revealed they learned to become "less likely to mindlessly obey authority figures and more likely to speak up for themselves and others" (Ruscio 56). Zimbardo's first conclusion was his experiment was out of control because the guards were escalating their abuse towards the prisoners. Second, he questioned the morality of his study after Christina Maslach visited the prison and said "It's terrible what you are doing to these boys!"
The video on The Milgram Experiment shows a group of people who have the title as “teacher” who are being tested to see how they react while administering seemingly dangerous electricity voltage to someone who has the title as “learner”. The “learner” in the video is also an actor. He is pretending to be in an immense amount of pain as they administer the electricity. The other actor is a scientist.
A psychologist named Stanley Milgram carried out an experiment focusing on the conflict between obedience and personal conscience. Three people were involved in this experiment: a teacher, a learner and an experimenter. The learner and experimenter were actors so that it was rigged for the participant to be the teacher. In this experiment, the learner has a list of paired words where the teacher names a word, awaiting the answer to be the paired word. If incorrect, a shock is to be administered, increasing with every wrong answer to a potential of 450 volts, which could kill a human.
In 1963, Stanley Milgram, a psychologist at Yale University, carried out an experiment into the obedience of seemingly normal Germans to Nazi authority during the Holocaust. He hoped to examine whether Americans would obey the instructions of authority, even if doing so contradicted their moral beliefs. A newspaper advertisement billed the experiment as a study into memory, calling for ordinary males from various professions. At the start of the experiment, each participant was introduced to, what they believed to be, another participant (he was in fact a confederate of Milgram).
The Milgram experiment is an experiment which test the way people do terrible things because of orders they are given. The experiment consists of filming two people, one asks questions, the other is being asked a series of memory questions. The person who is asking the series of memory questions thinks he is being told what questions to ask by a “scientist”, the scientist is actually just an actor. The people are hooked up to a voltage machine that can give off anywhere to no voltage to the legal amount of voltage a human can be given. The “scientist” is instructed to increase the voltage each time the person gets a memory question wrong.
While arguably one of the defining psychological studies of the 20th Century, the research was not without flaws. Almost immediately the study became a subject for debate amongst psychologists who argued that the research was both ethically flawed and its lack of diversity meant it could not be generalized. Ethically, a significant critique of the experiment is that the participants actually believed they were administering serious harm to a real person, completely unaware that the learner was in fact acting. Although Milgram argued that the illusion was a necessary part of the experiment to study the participants’ reaction, they were exposed to a highly stressful situation. Many were visibly distraught throughout the duration of the test
For every pair that is incorrectly matched the voltage will go up, going all the way up to 450-volt shock. Also each time that the teacher is going to administer a shock they have to iterate the voltage amount. When the experiment begins nothing eventful occurs because the voltage levels are low. As the voltage starts going up we start to hear the learner making noises (uhg), initially the participant does not react. After it happens again we see the participant ask a question regarding the noise, but continues when instructed.
The learner was strapped to a chair with electrodes. After he has to learn pairs which was given for him to study, the teacher tests him to learn and tests him by naming a word and asking the learner to remember its partner from a list of the