ipl-logo

The Negative Effects Of Lack Of Pay Of College Athletes

1091 Words5 Pages

The NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) considers college athletes to be amateur athletes, which means that they are not allowed to be paid by schools. Many people believe that college students and especially college athletes are overworked, which begs the question, how does the lack of payment of college athletes affect their well-being? College athletes are not allowed to be paid by their schools or depending on the state they are in, by others despite the amount of effort and profit they bring to the schools. This is unfair to the athletes because they have the stresses of being an athlete without any of the rewards of being an athlete. College athletes are negatively affected by their lack of payment because they aren’t fairly …show more content…

As is stated earlier, the NCAA considers college athletes to be amateur athletes, which means that they are only allowed to make money off of scholarships, cannot be paid by schools, and only in 20 states are students able to profit on their NIL (Name, Image and Likeness). This means that those students can’t be involved in advertisements, or run any promotions on their social media because it would be in violation of state laws. Since the students aren’t able to get paid a salary by colleges, and most aren’t allowed to profit off of their name, the only way that college athletes can make money for their sports is through scholarships, which usually not fully given to athletes, don’t help with food, room and board, or travel costs, meaning that college athletes are usually left with little money because they have to fund all of those expenses themselves. College athletes also have to be successful enough to be able to profit on their own. College athletes often report not having enough money to travel home and see their family (Compensation for College Athletes). This can also affect their well-being because they aren’t able to be around their loved …show more content…

College students should be paid for their work because they have to deal with the stresses of being both a student and an athlete. College students themselves are already very stressed, with the American College Health Association finding that 63 percent of college students report feeling overwhelming anxiety and 42 percent felt so depressed it was difficult to function (Improving College Students’ Mental Health). With a sport on top of this, which as previously mentioned takes up more than 40 hours a week, college athletes have to put in a lot of work during their time at

Show More
Related
1721 Words | 7 Pages

Sports reporter, Kate Murphy, succinctly summarizes an overwhelming standpoint that many people seem to cite in her article "Privilege, not a job: College athletes shouldn 't be paid. " First, she stipulates herself that student-athletes technically fit the criteria of hardworking employees. She also acknowledges that it is nearly impossible for athletes to balance a job while adhering to their strict schedules. However, because student-athletes are "living the dream" and are supposed to drink up the passion and sacrifices of their game, seeking compensation is grotesque and un-sportsman like. This argument rides on the coattails of "purity."

Read More
358 Words | 2 Pages

The debate of whether not college athletes should be paid has been going on for a couple decades now. With college institutions gaining revenue from football bowl games and March Madness in basketball, Dr. Dennis Johnson thinks that “There now is a clamoring for compensating both football and basketball players beyond that of an athletic scholarship” (2012). On the other hand, Dr. John Acquaviva is satisfied with the current college system in which colleges provide athletic scholarships which reward a free college education in return for representing the university’s athletic program (2012). Dr. Johnson then follows up Dr. Aquaviva’s claim with his five selling points for the paying of college athletes and Dr. Aquaviva provides five points

Read More
904 Words | 4 Pages

Mike says”Students all over the world work hard at the sport that true love and don’t get a lot in return for it”. While college athletes may not exactly be employees, they are more than just students. Consider the life of a student-athlete, though. The average Division I football player dedicates over 43hours per week to his sport, meaning that he spends more than a typical American work-week training and playing football, in addition to his class work. Their work, which generates exorbitant amounts of money year in and year out, deserves Compensation.

Read More
789 Words | 4 Pages

”The players are classified as students rather than athletes, so they do not receive the same legal protections as employees”(“College athletes should be paid for their participation”). This is a huge problem. Since student athletes are considered just students, colleges are not legally obligated to pay the athletes for their work or cover any expenses if they get injured while playing their sport. In the summer of 2021 The NCAA's rule change allowed college athletes to sign paid endorsement deals so student-athletes could profit from their own names, images, and likenesses”(“college athletes should be paid for their participation”). it wasn't until 2021 that students could make money for their advertising so they were getting no compensation and some players that are not as well known still get no money.

Read More
934 Words | 4 Pages

With the stereotype that college athletes get special treatment, the prospect that they can get paid and other students in college do not would seem fair. There are students in these schools that work hard every day. Yet as a college athlete everything is harder on them. College athletes have early morning practices and early morning classes. Then they practice again in the afternoon and have to find time to study and complete their school work while having to find time to workout throughout the week as well.

Read More
1829 Words | 8 Pages

There is no reason to pay college athletes because they are students first and academics should be one’s first priority, they already receive their fair share in extras, many of the athletes receive financial help through athletic scholarships, and the NCAA is an amateur enterprise and no amateur athlete in any sport is paid. The main reason colleges exist is to allow people the chance to get an education and earn a degree. Student-athletes are no exception to this. Just as other students are involved in clubs or groups, athletes play sports. Those students are students first

Read More
851 Words | 4 Pages

They spend countless hours practicing, traveling, and competing, all while trying to balance their academics. Many of them come from low-income backgrounds and could use the money to support themselves and their families. Additionally, college sports generate a lot of revenue for universities, and it seems unfair that the athletes who are actually responsible for producing that revenue don't see any of it. However, there are some arguments against paying student athletes.

Read More
784 Words | 4 Pages

For quite some time now, there has been a big debate on rather college athletes should get paid or not. If you were a college athlete, wouldn’t it be nice to get paid doing what you love to do? These athletes are spending most of their time focusing on their sport. For some, it may even be multiple sports. College athletes balance school, studying, and multiple practices; therefore, provides a limited amount of time to work a job.

Read More
788 Words | 4 Pages

A 2019 study done by the National College Players Association found 86% of college athletes live in poverty due to their demanding practices and schedules. So many college athletes live without needs because their demanding sports take up all of their time. While practicing, playing, and training the athletes have to risk their bodies with the possibility of obtaining such a substantial injury that can alter their life. College athletes should be paid because while often receiving a lower education due to their demanding schedules they are risking their bodies and future while often receiving a lower education and many are living below the poverty line even though they are valued at over $1 million. To start off, college athletes are risking

Read More
571 Words | 3 Pages

One of the reasons why college athletes should be paid is that they bring in a significant amount of revenue for their universities. As noted in "The Case for Paying College Athletes," “The college sports industry generates $11 billion in annual revenues. Fifty colleges report annual revenues that exceed $50 million. Meanwhile, five colleges report annual revenues that exceed $100 million.” Text 1 line 1-3

Read More
1579 Words | 7 Pages

In his March Madness interview, Mark Emmert, the head of the NCAA, states how it would be “utterly unacceptable…to convert students into employees” (PBS). There would also be little to no difference between college and professional sports, and would fail to preserve the “amateurism”, as valued by the NCAA. Emmert justified this principle by claiming that “college athletes can’t be paid for their labor or commercial use of their names, images…because such pay would be exploitative” (O’Bannon). This arbitrary line between how college athletes are paid compared to their coaches and their performance on the field does little to fully explain to the extent to which college athletes cannot profit off anything during their college careers. While college athletes receive virtually little to no compensation for their contributions to their sports, their coaches can make up to an average of $1.75 million dollars.

Read More
1317 Words | 6 Pages

College athletes take many risks and make personal sacrifices in order to bring in revenue for their school, for this reason, they should be paid employees. The first reason in why college athletes should be paid is that college athletes take many risks. Depending on the scholarship, if an athlete is injured and unable to play they can lose their

Read More
1073 Words | 5 Pages

College Athletes Should Not Recieve Payment College student-athletes should be paid, right? Maybe not. As an athlete, I put in 3 or more hours of work daily for my sport, from practice, training, and watching film. I do all this for the love of the game, not so that one day I can go to college and compete to get paid the highest and have that be my main focus rather than my development as a player. Being paid would bring conflict to sports people once loved.

Read More
1538 Words | 7 Pages

On top of a scholarship, student athletes are also provided with many free things such as game tickets, apparel and equipment. Although scholarships take off a lot of the cost to go to college, they aren’t enough on their own. Most scholarships are not full ride and students are left to pay some school fines. Student athletes need an income to help pay the extra money they owe that the scholarship doesn’t pay for, and also so that they have some money when they come out of college. Paying college athletes is a way to encourage students to play sports.

Read More
707 Words | 3 Pages

Some people believe that all college athletes have plenty of time and don't deserve to get paid, while the other side believes that they put in lots of time and dedication, and deserve to get paid for the things they do. Also according to the article “This Study Proves Just How Much Time College Athletes Spend On Their Sports,” It states Student-athletes are allowed to dedicate a maximum of four hours per day, 20 hours per week during the season with one day off and eight hours per week in the offseason with two days off. While yes they do get some days off there still put in numerous hours, lots of time and dedication, and much more, Leaving them with little to no time to do anything else. So with that, they should be getting paid for all of the hard work and numerous hours they put

Read More

More about The Negative Effects Of Lack Of Pay Of College Athletes

Related Topics

Open Document