The Pros And Cons Of A Citizen's Invasion Of Privacy

477 Words2 Pages

After Snowden leaked mass surveillance and targeted surveillance programs that involved the NSA and the United Kingdom (U.K.’s) Government Communication Headquarters (GCHQ); the political arenas, the media, U.S. and U.K. government officials reacted to the citizen’s invasion of private communications (Raab 2017). Many U.S. and U.K. citizens praised the information moving forward into the public arena, and for having a variety of questions for public and political debate. Then-U.K. Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond impersonated the Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) of Parliament outlook in responding, the citizens of the U.S. and U.K. have demanded the protection from our government from those that wish to do us harm. The NSA and GCHQ must monitor all private communications to perform their job effectively, but we should not lose focus on the difference between the privacy we desire …show more content…

The Privacy Act (1974) establishes a relationship between privacy, freedom, and human dignity. “Respecting a person's privacy is to acknowledge such a person's right to freedom and to recognize that individual as an autonomous human being” (Britz 2010). However, a government has the absolute right to collect private and personal information from its citizens with the intent of securing order and peace in society. The use of technology has a major difference between privacy and confidentiality. Meaning, privacy varies from a private conversation to the location of private possessions; while, confidentiality varies between private medical records to trading secrets (Britz 2010). To better protect a person’s private information via the internet, a citizen can create strong passwords for documents, e-mails, banking statements, and classified