ipl-logo

Animal Testing Bad

725 Words3 Pages

Over 100 million animals are used as test subjects in the world, with approximately 26 million of them in the United States. Sadly, a majority of the time the products that are being tested on animals are not even effective once human trials begin. Consumers might object that if the products were tested to be safe on animals then they would be safe for humans. Yet, 92% of the times the products actually work in animal trials they are later deemed too dangerous or uneffective for people. Which means that most of the animals used in scientific testing are being abused for no apparent reason. Due to this realization, it seems ridiculous to continue to harm, expose to danger, and mistreat animals all in the name of science. Ethics are described as the moral principles that guide the way people behave. Ethical issues range from child labor to discrimination to animal testing. Science has put regulations and restrictions against the …show more content…

These people would also say it is difficult to replace animals because other options are more difficult to test on. According to Ferdowsian, replacing animals in research would be difficult because the biology and genetic make up of animals is too similar to humans to be easy to replicate. Therefore, removing all animal testing would be a difficult task because testing the products on an actual organism allow researchers to mirror the outcomes of the products on humans. However, Ferdowsian continues by stating, “While it is important to acknowledge limitations to non-animal methods remain, recent developments demonstrate that these limitations should be viewed as rousing challenges rather than insurmountable obstacles.” (par. 21) She is essentially saying that while it will be difficult to remove animal testing, science should not give up on this goal just because it will prove

Show More
Related
1513 Words | 7 Pages

In Elizabeth Fisher’s paper, she brings up the statement that animals can be modified to fit the disease that needs to be tested, and also that animals are similar to humans. Jessica Sandler would most likely disagree with Elizabeth Fisher because she believes animal models are nothing like human models. Some animals lack organs that humans have, also drugs that are tested can go through their bloodstream and organs a different way than a human's. Jessica Sandler then explains that even scientists who are in favor of animal testing agree it is unpredictable; because animal DNA may be similar, but they are far from the same as humans. Which in result makes the animals poor test subjects.

Read More
1066 Words | 5 Pages

In “Animal Testing is Bad Science” states that “The Federal Drug Administration has noted that 92 percent of all drugs that are shown to be safe and effective in animal test fail in human trials because they don’t work or are dangerous.” This shows that doing experiments on animals are unreliable and do not always have the same effect on humans. In addition, animal experimentation is unethical and unreliable and it puts the animals in

Read More
917 Words | 4 Pages

Even though decades have passed, there are still people who argue that animal testing is essential to saving millions of human lives; not even realizing the lack of results, the high cost, and the immortality

Read More
956 Words | 4 Pages

Animal Testing is it right or wrong Animals have been used for experiments in order to find more information on the human anatomy and how humans biological structures react to certain variable. Animals can be used in various forms experiments like dissection, trials, and other factors that animalś bodies may react to. Humans reason to test on animals is that they have similar genetic coding, and can be used for medical research to develop new medical practices or to learn more about conditions and diseases that affect the human body. There had been conflicts since the beginning of animal experimentation whether it is right to use animals in experiments or if it is wrong in moral standards. This is a very difficult topic to discuss based

Read More
241 Words | 1 Pages

Since the existence of man there will always be issues and problems. One ethical problem that I can not fathom is animal testing. Animal testing is one issue I wish I could solve, for many reasons. Animals deserve rights, even though they can’t speak. The ways animal testing is conducted is not humane.

Read More
555 Words | 3 Pages

There are other ways we could experiment, like computer models. However, there are many benefits from using animals, because animals give us real life results (Chang, 2). Computer models can help us but not in a way the hands on animal testing helps us. We gain hand on knowledge and experiments with animals that benefit humans and animals (Chang, 2). What animal research protesters don’t know is that there are over 350 human disease that have an animal counterpart.

Read More
1143 Words | 5 Pages

Animal testing exists to prevent certain medicines from being experimented on human beings; most often used in this research are rats, rabbits, cats, many forms of primates, and the list goes on as an estimated of ¨more than 115 million animals worldwide are used in laboratory experiments every year.¨ (Humane Society International). With this information not being common knowledge among much of the world, there is, like any situation, two sides to this

Read More
604 Words | 3 Pages

Rpt. from "Can Technology Help Us Put an End to Animal Experimentation?" io9.com. 2012.Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 26 Sept. 2016.

Read More
1152 Words | 5 Pages

Animal testing simply means the use of non-human animals in experiments, which indeed arouse great controversy in recent years. More and more people think that human being’s benefits can’t outweigh animals’

Read More
1972 Words | 8 Pages

In this 21st century society, scientific research raises the question of ethics. One of these major issues would be the topic of animal testing. Many believe that animal testing is an awful way of measuring the effectiveness of cosmetics and cures for deadly diseases, but without it scientists would not have been able to find cures for diseases like Parkinson’s disease, malaria, smallpox and many other illnesses. Though it has cured countless diseases, lobbyists and protesters still find animal testing as cruel and immoral, questioning the morality of the scientists who do this. On the contrary, when looking at the analysis and ideals, animal testing for the good of humankind should be acknowledged by lobbyists, for one day they might need

Read More
1144 Words | 5 Pages

Many see it as “ total elimination of animal testing will significantly set back the development of essential medical devices, medicines, and treatment” (Hajar 7). Animal testing is a necessary evil that has been extremely beneficial to humans and is crucial to the advancement of medicine in the

Read More
447 Words | 2 Pages

In the United States an estimated 26 million animals are used for testing each year. This includes both scientific and commercial uses. Animal testing is used for testing medical treatments, checking safety of products intended for human use, determine toxicity of medications, and numerous other commercial, biomedical, and health care issues. With testing there are many positives and negatives, however unfortunately neither side tips the scale to please everyone. There is no clear way to please scientists, citizens and government.

Read More
591 Words | 3 Pages

Opponents of animal testing say that it is cruel and inhumane to experiment on animals, that alternative methods available to researchers can replace animal testing, and that animals are so different from human beings that research on animals often yields irrelevant

Read More
1067 Words | 5 Pages

Imagine an enraged animal rights activist charging toward a scientist in a white lab coat, desperate to free the little mice that are being used as test subjects. Although comical, this scene may be quite accurate when describing the passion that animal lovers have when it comes to the touchy subject of animal testing. For centuries, animal testing has been used in the medical research field, however many are now beginning to question whether it is ethical. Millions of animals are killed per year due to animal testing, so is this practice worth banning? Animal testing is a controversial subject, with supporters pointing out the medical advances that have stemmed from animal research and animal rights activists declaring it cruel and immoral.

Read More
967 Words | 4 Pages

Animal testing is a phrase that most people have heard but are perhaps still unsure of exactly what it involve. Whether it is called animal testing, experimentation or research, it should be defined as all testing methods on animals including, medical exploration, cosmetics, toxicology trialing, and psychological examination involving animal subjects. It is used to assess the safety and effectiveness of medications and beauty products as well as understanding how the human physiology works. While supporters believe it is necessary practice, those against animal testing believe that it involves torture and suffering to animals. Medical research is the hardest case of proposition in the debate whether animal testing should be banned or not, since it has previously yielded substantial benefits for humanity.

Read More

More about Animal Testing Bad

Open Document