Bio would then presumptively speak and supplement what Elizabeth Fisher said by adding that humans and animals can catch almost every disease, cold, flue, like a human can, which is why they make good test subjects.
In Ian Sample’s newsletter "Drugs research hampered by substandard animal testing procedures." shows a plethora of data about how scientist skew the research being done. One way that they are doing this is by making a bias study. This means the animals that fail the study, they remove them by stating the animal was not in the proper conditions to go through with the experiment performed on them. In the world of animal research, scientists are supposed to have a random animal group testing so that there is no way to get a bias, but Ian
…show more content…
In Elizabeth Fisher’s paper, she brings up the statement that animals can be modified to fit the disease that needs to be tested, and also that animals are similar to humans. Jessica Sandler would most likely disagree with Elizabeth Fisher because she believes animal models are nothing like human models. Some animals lack organs that humans have, also drugs that are tested can go through their bloodstream and organs a different way than a human's. Jessica Sandler then explains that even scientists who are in favor of animal testing agree it is unpredictable; because animal DNA may be similar, but they are far from the same as humans. Which in result makes the animals poor test subjects. To contradict that statement, Elizabeth Fisher could bring up the multiple drugs that had been passed and deemed safe, because they had been animal tested. Jessica Sandler could then point out that twenty-three drugs in the past 2 years have been taken off the shelf because it either gave humans unforeseen side effects, or killed