Chapter 11 1. Fiscal policy can be described as the use of government purchases, taxes, transfer payments, and government borrowing with an objective of influencing economy-wide variables such as the employment rates, the economic growth, and the rates of inflation (McEachern, 2015). 1. When all other factors are held constant, a decrease in government purchases will lead to an increase in the real GDP demanded 2. An increase in net taxes, holding other factors constant, will lead to an increase in the real GDP demanded.
The Pros and Cons of Banning Books There are two sides to the book banning: those for it and those against it. These sources will show why books get banned. First, there is the author Macey France she makes her point of saying why books should be banned by showing the bad parts of banned books. The next author, Jenni White has a similar approach and even uses a quote from France. This next author, Emma Greguska writes her point about how we should not ban books, saying these books prepare the students for the future and teaches them how to deal with real-life problems in a safe space.
Book banning in public schools should cease in existence, for the reason that controlling what students should or should not read violates the first amendment right of freedom of speech, some students to feel left out or treated as burdens when they are not allowed to read a book for an assignment, leaving minority students misrepresented or not represented at all, and preconditions the mindsets of students to formulate a preconceived idea rather than students formulating their own opinions. To form their own opinions students need to be exposed to all avenues in a safe, controlled environment, such as schools, in order to truly find out who they are, and who or what they want to represent. If parents have an issue with the topics discussed
Banning books is bad because it stops children from learning a bunch of things that they need to know, whether it’s history, how to cope or how to show empathy and learn different perspectives. Books should not be banned, without books we will not learn about history, struggles people go through in everyday life including discrimination. “In America, we don't ban books, we don't ban free thought, we don't silence free speech. The Nazis did that,” Davis said on a website called
Would you want anyone to ban books so you couldn’t further your education? School Board members should not ban certain books because students can get more of a challenge from certain books, you also can get many life lessons from a more mature book, and students also get more of a choice which means more books to read. One reason I believe school board members should not ban books is because it gives students more of a challenge. For example, teachers like to challenge kids to read above their grade level and reading more mature books will get them there. However, how will they get assigned harder or more challenging books if those kinds of books are banned from the school library.
1.) Books can be amongst some of the best teachers. Furthermore books teach us many things like new vocabulary and new ways of thinking, so we should embrace all books and not ban them. 2.) Additionally, most banned books go on to become classics.
Banned Books are books that are prohibited by law or to which free access is not permitted by other means. Banning books is against the writers right for freedom of speech, which is the first amendment. Students have the right to read, reading is not illegal, so why ban books? If a reader is mature enough to handle some curse words or bad behavior then they should be able to read banned books. Some people believe books should not be banned in schools/libraries but just because you do not like it does not mean it should be taken away, that is the authors freedom of speech.
There are countless reasons that everybody should know why books are being banned all over the world! One of the reasons is that parents do not want their children to be exposed to inappropriate topics. Moreover, some books discusses topics that people object to like dark arts and homosexuality. However, there are also reasons why books should not be banned. When children enjoy books, it improves their vocabulary, and it teaches them life lessons.
1- Sometimes government doesn't want people to know what is going on in the world, or what happened in the past. Some of the government wants people to follow their agenda and make people blind and not seeing the truth. In my opinion, in some cases, bane some books are good. For example, before we had a government that is banned many books. The reason why I agree with the previous government for this point, it was for people benefit and to protect them.
There are both pros and cons to banning book in school. According to ProCon.org, “Parents have the right to decide what material their children are exposed to and when.” Parents have the right to ban books so they can protect their children from violent content. Children need to be protect from content that could scar them. ProCon.org also states that “Children should not be exposed to sex, violence, drug use, or other inappropriate topics in school or public libraries.”
At the start of this investigation I had a clear opinion about banning books. I believed that no book should be banned, by anyone, and that public libraries should provide every possible information for the readers, as it was their duty. As I kept reading the points that supported my opinion, this one grew stronger, until I investigated the other side of the argument, where points as to why books should be banned were given. Now, that I have read that part, I realize that there is much more to the simple answer of “books shouldn’t be banned” So, my conclusion to this research is that with the diverse opinions and morals that exist in our world the books that have been banned have been done for a reason.
This article is talking about if banning books should be a thing or if we should keep books around because of the moral, religious, or political grounds. ¨In totalitarian societies, books have been banned for challenging a government’s ruling authority.” If they ban books they would be using less trees for paper to create books and other things. People can do their homework and find their resources online. “ The movement against the banning of books also has a long history.”
There are pros and cons about if books should or should not be banned. They are being banned in schools libraries What do you think? Should books be banned? Some people think books should not be banned because some books are not that bad and some of the book that are being banned help people.
[21]” (ProCon.org). Banning books in school can create a problem for the teachers that are trying to assign something to the class. With the new addition to the first amendment schools will have the rights to any books. When books are banned the life lessons in the books are also
Banned Books are books that are prohibited by law or to which free access is not permitted by other means. Banning books is against the writers right for freedom of speech, which is the first amendment. Students have the right to read, reading is not illegal, so why ban books? If a reader is mature enough to handle some curse words or bad behavior then they should be able to read banned books. Some people believe books should not be banned in schools/libraries but just because you do not like it does not mean it should be taken away, that is the authors freedom of speech.
