ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of British Nuclear Weapons

798 Words4 Pages

Having nuclear weapons is a extremely polemical issue in the modern world .This is because this issue is having many benefits and drawbacks for states who own nuclear arsenal , there some questions need to answers such as How much does UK spend on its weapons and if UK leaves its weapons and spend much more money in British community what would happen ? . There are many opponents who claim that the United Kingdom should leave its nuclear weapons and focus on the civil life which can provide a better life for the next generations. However , Some supporters say that if Britain keeps its nuclear power , it can help to the balance of the changing world power . This essay will contain persuasive reasons for each point view in this argument and …show more content…

This world is changing continuously and many states around the world seek to possess mass destruction such as Iran , South Korea , Sudan and also there are many terrorist organizations in Afghanistan , Iraq and Syria which can threat the security of the world . BBC report (2015) said the nuclear capability is irreplaceable for insurance UK security and some rogue states and terrorist groups continue to gain nuclear capability at any time . So Britain is needed to nuclear weapon to be determinant weapon to defend on this country .Additionally , even conventional defence system for country destroyed by enemy, the silent nuclear weapon in the sea still be already to launch strike on enemies . . furthermore , British nuclear weapons system has employed more than fifteen thousand of employees (BBC 2015) . So the defense system provides huge number of jobs and it helps many families to live . This is because it is difficult to find new jobs as same number as in the alternative sectors especially after last financial crisis . In other word , the system could be beneficial in financial aspects . For instance , if United Kingdom faced nuclear attacking , the damage which happened will be more expensive for the country in Reconstruction process than spending money to keep its nuclear arsenal In the alert for any possible danger

Open Document