ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of British Nuclear Weapons

798 Words4 Pages

Having nuclear weapons is a extremely polemical issue in the modern world .This is because this issue is having many benefits and drawbacks for states who own nuclear arsenal , there some questions need to answers such as How much does UK spend on its weapons and if UK leaves its weapons and spend much more money in British community what would happen ? . There are many opponents who claim that the United Kingdom should leave its nuclear weapons and focus on the civil life which can provide a better life for the next generations. However , Some supporters say that if Britain keeps its nuclear power , it can help to the balance of the changing world power . This essay will contain persuasive reasons for each point view in this argument and …show more content…

This world is changing continuously and many states around the world seek to possess mass destruction such as Iran , South Korea , Sudan and also there are many terrorist organizations in Afghanistan , Iraq and Syria which can threat the security of the world . BBC report (2015) said the nuclear capability is irreplaceable for insurance UK security and some rogue states and terrorist groups continue to gain nuclear capability at any time . So Britain is needed to nuclear weapon to be determinant weapon to defend on this country .Additionally , even conventional defence system for country destroyed by enemy, the silent nuclear weapon in the sea still be already to launch strike on enemies . . furthermore , British nuclear weapons system has employed more than fifteen thousand of employees (BBC 2015) . So the defense system provides huge number of jobs and it helps many families to live . This is because it is difficult to find new jobs as same number as in the alternative sectors especially after last financial crisis . In other word , the system could be beneficial in financial aspects . For instance , if United Kingdom faced nuclear attacking , the damage which happened will be more expensive for the country in Reconstruction process than spending money to keep its nuclear arsenal In the alert for any possible danger

Show More
Related
761 Words | 4 Pages

hydrogen bomb or H-bomb, weapon inferring an extensive bit of its vitality from the atomic combination of hydrogen isotopes. In a nuclear bomb, uranium or plutonium is part into lighter components that together weigh not exactly the first iotas, the rest of the mass showing up as vitality. Not at all like this splitting bomb, the hydrogen bomb capacities by the combination, or joining together, of lighter components into heavier components. The deciding item again weighs not as much as its parts, the distinction afresh showing up as vitality. Since to a great degree high temperatures are required with a specific end goal to start combination responses, the hydrogen bomb is otherwise called an atomic bomb.

Read More
555 Words | 3 Pages

First off, not disagree with the decisions of the president to drop atomic bombs in Nagasaki, Hiroshima. The reason why I disagree with the atomic weapons that were drawn in japan is because there were thousand of people who were killed, innocent peoples who died in that bomb drops. there were military men who died, but at the same time is was acceptable for united states to fight, and win the war. United states were discomforted the lost thousand of people, including military, 48,000 people from the united states, military, and innocent peoples. It was grave that the united states had thousands of life that are why they proposed the attack besides japan.

Read More
155 Words | 1 Pages

During 1945 Nuclear Bombs became widely used throughout World War II so we have to prepare for this because it can happen any day. The first time we used a nuclear bomb was used in July 16, 1945 in New Mexico as a test. Then on August 16, 1945 the world changed when the United States attacked Japan with a nuclear bomb. Since nuclear bombs were invented by us, Russians also invented the dangerous weapon which would lead to the Cold War and us fearing about nuclear mass attacks. Everybody knows the most convenient way to be protected from nuclear bombings was by stop, drop, and tuck.

Read More
200 Words | 1 Pages

The United States should have dropped the atomic bomb on Japan because it would show how capable they are to the world. A scientist, Leo Szilard, had a meeting with James Byrnes who was one of President Truman’s advisors. According to Leo Szilard, James Byrnes had concern over the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union was expanding their influence in Asia and Europe, but he does not want that to happen. He believes that if they bomb Japan, then they might impress the Soviet Union.

Read More
347 Words | 2 Pages

The Atomic Bombs. The dropping of the atomic bombs on japan was not justified, giving them no warning the U.S. went through and dropped the bomb to end war faster killing thousands of people. Considering the fact that this happened during world war 2, many were left dead, hurt, and with destroyed cities, due to japan not wanting to surrender, citizens of japan and the people in japan were impacted by this action. The United States, dropped theses bombs with not one single warning, above cities, and they did it to impress Russia.

Read More
533 Words | 3 Pages

In August 1945, amidst the closing stages of World War II, the United States made the monumental decision to deploy atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan. Leading up to that monumental decision, the Pacific and European Theaters of World War II saw fierce battles between Japan and Allied forces, particularly the United States. The conflict was marked by intense fighting, with significant losses on both sides. Specifically, the Battle of Okinawa, fought from April to June 1945, was one of the bloodiest battles. It involved intense ground combat and heavy casualties on both sides.

Read More
295 Words | 2 Pages

On August 6, 1945 the U.S. dropped the first atomic bomb on Hiroshima, Japan. On August 9, the second bomb was dropped on Nagasaki, Japan. As of today, the United States Government made the right decision about having dropped the atomic bombs on Japan because it caused the total surrender of Japan, it saved civilian lives, and it kept the peace balanced across the allies. On August 15, 1945 just 6 days after the second bomb was dropped the japanese announced their total surrender and on September 2, the instrument of surrender was signed.

Read More
840 Words | 4 Pages

Over half a century has passed since the dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but the debate over the decision to drop it is still alive and well. While there are valid points for both sides, the evidence and reason shown leans in favor of the side protesting the dropping of the bombs. The atomic bombs have caused so many problems since they have been dropped - problems that could have easily been prevented. If Truman just stopped to assess the situation with a clearer perspective, he would easily be able to see that the dropping of such a bomb would leave lasting psychological and physical negative effects, that Japan was already in a fragile state and would have surrendered soon anyways, and that if he were to go through with the atomic bombs he should have at least warned Japan.

Read More
560 Words | 3 Pages

In 1945 the United States was faced with an extremely difficult decision, this decision would bring a beginning to the “nuclear age” and end world war 2 but was it worth it. The decision to drop the atomic bombs on Japan is thought to have been done to prevent the loss of an estimated 200,000 American troops; the bombs were an alternative to occupation/invasion . The first crucial point to consider is the alternative options available to the United States to achieve victory in the Pacific Theater; the two primary Alternatives were a full-scale invasion of Japan or a Prolonged blockade. Both of these options would have likely resulted in Far higher casualties on both sides and an invasion of Japan would have exposed countless soldiers to brutal Warfare, leading to a catastrophic loss of life.

Read More
1210 Words | 5 Pages

The Atom Bomb. After reading these articles, we should be asking a lot of questions. Was it necessary to drop these bombs or should we have gone on foot? What was the worst of the evils? Who would suffer the most from going in and taking over.

Read More
532 Words | 3 Pages

Atomic Bomb Argumentative Essay There had been many debates about whether the U.S. should or should not have dropped the atomic bombs on Japan. Well, in my opinion, I think that the U.S. should not have dropped the atomic bombs on Japan and there are two reasons why not. One reason why the U.S. should not have dropped the atomic bombs on Japan is because there were other alternatives of what they could’ve done. Another reason why the U.S. should not have dropped the atomic bombs on Japan is because the use of the atomic bombs was inhumane.

Read More
700 Words | 3 Pages

Should the U.S. have dropped the atomic bombs on Japan? Some people believe that the U.S. should not have dropped the atomic bombs on Japan, while others believe that the U.S. did the right thing by dropping the bombs. One thing both sides should agree upon is that the atomic bombs dropped on Japan ended the war faster than it would have if the U.S. did not drop the bombs. The atomic bombing on Japan was necessary for the war to end because it stopped the fighting and additional casualties that would have occurred if the war had not ended. The U.S. did the right thing by dropping the atomic bombs because they prevented the additional casualties that would have occurred.

Read More
1111 Words | 5 Pages

Atomic weaponry was a foreign concept to the world in the 1940s, and when the USA unleashed its destructive power upon Japan in 1945, many questions arose about the moral connotations this bomb posed. It’s estimated that the atomic bomb saved 30 million lives Japanese and Allied alike by ending the continued fighting. However, in its wake, 200,000 deaths were caused by the impact at Hiroshima, with many more to follow via its lingering effects. Amid the devastation of WW2, the atomic bomb was seen as one of the few decisions left to end the destruction, despite this, the ethics of it are even now still under fire. Was the terror the bomb brought with it worth the victory or if it should have never been developed?

Read More
1290 Words | 6 Pages

The United States dropped atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, on August 6th and August 9th of 1945, respectively. This event resulted in the death of an estimated 200,000 Japanese people, a lot of which were civilians, and it remains as one of the most controversial topics in world history. People are divided on the belief that it was necessary or that it was unnecessary, each with their own valid points to back up their reasoning, yet, the bombing of Japan had more pros than cons and therefore was most definitely a necessary action in World War II. Most view the attack on Pearl Harbor by the Japanese as the reason for the bombing of Japan, there are a multitude of overlooked factors that were also partially the cause of the

Read More
1153 Words | 5 Pages

Buddhism and Abortion Abortion is a huge controversial topic around the world. The controversy is centered around morals and what is considered to be right, wrong and okay for certain circumstances. For example, circumstances that might make it okay for a woman to have an abortion is if she were raped and a child were conceived and she could not support the child or if she accidentally conceived or if she could lose her life birthing the child. The topic of abortion becomes complicated when religion is involved because of different religious views and beliefs on abortion. Abortion itself is, "a medical procedure that ends a pregnancy" (Parenthood, Planned).

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of British Nuclear Weapons

Related Topics

Open Document