More handpicked essays just for you.
Why charter schools good
Essay on the argument that charter school is better than public school
Pros and cons of california charter schools
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the article Charter School’s Segregation Roots, Christopher Bonastia argues that charter schools have become highly segregated. It is critical that charter schools have a diversity of children. Cultural diversity is important especially among young children it helps them to develop skills to function in multicultural environment and teaches them how to get along with each other at a young age. While, they are many positive and negative outcomes of charter school it is of importance that we are not using charter schools as an excuse for the cause of segregation. Additionally, charter schools should be striving for racial diversity among its teachers.
Growing away from the interests of teacher unions started with the first charter school in Minnesota. Minnesota’s charter law failed to include universal teacher certification requirements and automatic collective bargaining rights for teachers. It also failed to prevent the creation of charter schools that targeted particular ethnic and racial minority groups, therefore many charter schools were founded that aimed at a particular group such as Somali students (p.14). Furthermore, Democratic President Clinton supported the charter school movement, thus a lot of federal money was spent on founding new ones.
Over the past years, Charter schools has gone through its ups and downs. There are different sides to charter schools. Like every other schools, charter schools have its pros and cons. Charter schools are independent schools that receives government funding. Unlike public schools, they operate privately.
Charter schools are a different type of school that is helpful to some students but not all. What a charter school is, they are privately managed, taxpayer funded schools which are made up from the community. However charter schools are not like private schools they are in fact outlined after public schools. Charter schools are for students who want to achieve a high level education. The schools are open to all children, they don’t charge tuition and there are no special requirements for them to attend.
After reading chapter 26 I learned that charter schools should collaborate with public schools to support better education for students. Charters schools enroll a small number of English Learners and students with disabilities, in order for the parents to believe that those are better schools. Charters schools take funding from public schools because parents transfer their children to charter schools. Charters schools also suspend and kick out students who they believe will not help the school get high test scores and thus, not get money. Charter schools treat their students as a business, a way for them to make money and they discriminate those students who they believe won’t make them money.
This class action consolidated a number of cases presented on behalf of the black children who were denied-by segregation-admission to public schools, relying in state law. Public facilities used to be racially segregationist in the United States, especially in the south. The case pretended to question the doctrine "separate but equal" established in Plessy v. Ferguson (Link is external) , 163 US 537 (1896), which governed until that moment. This doctrine argued that the educational facilities substantially equal but separately were respectful of the equitable treatment between races. The plaintiffs argued that racially segregated public schools are not and cannot be considered equitable and therefore this system deprived them of their right
Lastly, charter schools are publicly funded independent schools established by a community group under the terms of a charter with a local authority. The term charter means a written grant by a country’s legislative or sovereign power, by which an institution is created
There are many problems with having many authorizers for charter schools as explained in the article. 1. Multiple authorizers limit charter school’s academic growth. 2. Multiple authorizers mean there is no oversight.
problem lies in the fact that most public schools have fixed costs from heating costs to teaching staff that cannot easily be adjusted or downscaled when a few students leave in a given year. The result equates to “squeezed funding at traditional public schools” (Daniel Simmons Ritchie). School choice is not necessary.
Charter schools aimed at serving a particular racial or ethnic group are not uncommon. Detail B: Charter schools are less diverse than public schools which is not good for children. Giving children diversity is great because the real world is full of different races. Detail C: The education state standards do require public charter schools to provide equal opportunity
Traditional public schools are generally much bigger than charter schools, giving them the ability to enroll more students and incorporate a variety of extracurricular activities. According to Peterson (2017) “Charter schools are funded by governments, but operate independently. This means that charter schools must persuade parents to select them instead of a neighborhood district school” (p.1). By having to recruit students for enrollment, charter schools target the most motivated students. Since charter schools are smaller than traditional public schools, they tend to run out of seating fast, therefore they enroll their students using a lottery.
Charter Schools have both positive and negative effects on education. Even though they are like public schools, they have different methods and guides when it comes to running a school and educating their students. These schools are usually independently managed or have a contract with the state which allows them to have fewer rules and regulations than traditional public schools. Even though charter schools benefit students in some ways, there are critics whom believe they offer a poorly educating system to students. In the other hand, some supporters believe that charter schools can operate more efficiently by removing existing regulations that public schools follow.
However Charter schools are still ran by the government, they also don’t discriminate by race, religion, or gender. If a school is mismanaged or test scores are poor, a charter school can be shut down. Most Charter schools don’t often have athletics available for the students. For this reason the students are allowed to play for the nearest Public school team. Charter schools exist in 40 states and the District of Columbia.
The Enlightenment, a time period between 1600c. and 1800c. , emphasized using reason, logic, and science to solve problems within society. European thinkers, such as Baron De Montesquieu, Jean Jacques Rousseau, John Locke, and J.H. Bernardin de Saint, used logic to question the authority of kings and queens. They also stressed freedom for all, humanism, and equality between rulers and their citizens.
Education is the most essential component to the future of American society, yet despite all the technological advances that society in general have achieved, it is still one of the areas rooted in the past. Many students today have computers, iPads and the Internet, however school hasn’t change form a decade ago. When Charter schools were created, many hoped that these schools may revolutionize the way public schools were. “Charter schools have introduced varied curricular structures, radically new blends of teaching and technology… One of the reasons charter schools have been successful with some of the most challenging students is because they find new ways to reach them.”
