ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control

676 Words3 Pages

If you had to choose one weapon to protect you and your home what would it be? I would assume that most of you chose a gun. Guns have achieved a brute status through years of movie glorification and numerous appearances in great crimes of the century. The commonly found solution to this problem would be the outlawing of firearms in certain areas, the outlawing of certain firearms, and strict regulations on the ownership of firearms. Lets think here for a moment, when people outlawed drugs did that stop criminals? No. People find ways to get what they want and if we disarm the citizens of America we are leaving them unprotected against the very criminals the laws were made for. This is why more stringent gun control and tougher firearms regulations do not lead to a decrease in gun related crimes and fatalities in the United States of America. …show more content…

While some level of restriction and regulation when it comes to firearms is a necessity, having heavy gun related laws is not beneficial to society and teeters dangerously close to infringing on the second amendment to the constitution. The second amendment protects the right of American citizens to bear arms so it would be illegal to outlaw them all together. There are a fair amount of studies and data collections that support the idea that rigorous gun regulations is not beneficial to decreasing gun violence. For example, a recent study published in the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy concluded that there is a negative correlation between gun ownership and violent crime. Even if private gun ownership was outlawed it wouldn’t be very beneficial. The nine European nations with the lowest gun ownership rate have a combined murder rate three times that of the nine European nations with the highest gun ownership

Show More
Related
587 Words | 3 Pages

Taking away guns would just cause more crimes that police force would not be able to keep up with. People claim rifles cause more harm; However taking away rifles will not prevent someone from harming others. “People are killed in greater numbers by cars, bats, hammers, hands and feet. Examining the tool and attempting to ban the tool will have absolutely no effect.” (why gun groups 5).

Read More
1037 Words | 5 Pages

Absolutely there needs to be some control, and no doubt more stringent regulations to own and conduct a gun than we bear today, but taking weapons out from us all together would be a catastrophe! The crime rates here in the United States have been on the rise for years and though we need to do something about it and fast, gun control is not the mere result. The matter that we need to understand is that, crime always has been and forever will be a piece of every company and it will increase as population increases. That much would be inevitable.

Read More
1313 Words | 6 Pages

Due to the unfortunate events that have happened in the past, many people are strongly for the regulations of firearms in the United States. Even though there are occasions where firearms are used by criminals for nothing less than evil, there are still many situations where firearms have been used to stop that same kind of evil. From stopping a criminal from robbing a convenient store to from stopping a sniper from killing more people than he already has, firearms have been used for good and not for evil in more situations than not. Many people in our nation believe that we should follow the example of some European nations and outright ban the sell and ownership of firearms.

Read More
630 Words | 3 Pages

Continuing to allow our citizens to own and operate firearms is not just basic freedom, it is safety. Facts involving the distribution of guns prove that making guns harder to buy through retail will not solve any problems. By examining what has taken place in Australia, it is clear that if guns are taken away from the citizens, it will not help lower crimes committed or deaths related to guns. In order to prevent crime, including homicides and mass shootings, gun control laws shouldn't infringe upon citizens constitutional rights to safety and self defense. It is assumed that if stricter gun laws that restricted people from buying guns by adding additional requirements when purchasing like deeper background checks took place, less crimes would be committed.

Read More
1489 Words | 6 Pages

“Firearms amplify domestic violence, resulting in American women being 11 times more likely to be murdered with a gun than women in similar countries”(Gun Laws Matter). As an example of gun control in its works, Australia’s gun violence statistics show how successful these laws can be. “The chances of being murdered by a gun in Australia plunged to 0.15 per 100,000 people in 2014 from 0.54 per 100,000 people in 1996, a decline of 72 percent... In 1996, Australia had 311 murderers of which 98 were with guns.

Read More
621 Words | 3 Pages

To combat mass shootings, both countries decided to implement board laws that banned certain guns, as well as introducing buybacks that would give money to individuals who turned in their firearms. It is hard to gauge whether that the reforms to firearms did work for Great Britain since there were hardly any mass shootings to begin with (Libresco). Leah Libresco and Carl Bialik also bring to light that “In Australia, homicides declined after the ban and buyback, but homicides had already been falling, according to a 2003 analysis by criminologists Peter Reuter and Jenny Mouzos.”. Another aspect that individuals fail to realize when using these two countries as examples is that both countries are small islands which creates the task of importing illegal guns harder as well as having a smaller pool of guns to control (Libresco). Finally, the most important difference that gun control advocates choose to neglect is that America has the Second Amendment where as Great Britain and Australia do

Read More
931 Words | 4 Pages

The implementation of stricter gun laws will not terminate crime. Washington, D.C. has some of the strictest gun laws in the country, yet it is one of the most dangerous places in the country to live. Criminals that seek to harm others do not obey laws. Changing the laws of a country or the making of new ones does not get rid of the problem. Adding more rules and regulations could create larger problems that do not involve guns, but instead, other types of weapons.

Read More
309 Words | 2 Pages

It is an ongoing debate whether or not people should be able to own a gun. People look at the laws and interpret it the way they feel it should be understood. People for gun control would say, “The second amendment is not an unlimited right to own guns.” People who are against guns control would claim, “The second amendment of the US constitution protect individual gun ownership.” In those two claims they use the second amendment to make a point.

Read More
733 Words | 3 Pages

The biggest issue of banning guns is not only this trivial aspect which I just mentioned, is the entire smuggling network there would be evolving guns. The police also state that robbers would create a huge black market selling people, drugs, and many other objects to eventually buy guns. After all this chaos is established, the government wouldn’t be able to do anything to avoid guns, as they will be all illegal, crime rate percentages would leap, and America's developed nation would slowly lose its

Read More
1700 Words | 7 Pages

In the past, the major gun control legislations that have been put into effect have not stopped people from obtaining firearms (Gun Control.) There have also been cases in the past where cities have attempted to ban handguns. After the ban was put into effect, murder rates tended to rise instead of drop, unlike what most people might assume. Crime rates and violence also skyrocketed after the bans were put into effect. Another problem with taking guns away, or banning them, is that the government cannot expect everyone to abide by the laws.

Read More
2067 Words | 9 Pages

Gun control is good, but the country should focus on the laws that already exist. If we would focus and follow the laws that are in place now we would have less crime happen. Wrecks that cause fatality happen 75 percent more often than accidents involving guns(Owning guns). We can stop all gun crime if we become more strict with the laws and rules of owning a gun. We need to enforce better rules such as: doing more background checks on both buyers and sellers, getting people to go through a legal gun dealer, and removing all gun trafficking.

Read More
1386 Words | 6 Pages

Gun control also limits our constitutionally derived right to own firearms. If gun control is enforced, law-abiding citizens will be forced to give up their guns and their right to own guns, while many criminals who own guns may illegally keep theirs. As the saying goes “If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns.” Guns are an important aspect of our society in many ways. They allow for protection, recreation, and hunting.

Read More
2192 Words | 9 Pages

Guns have been a part of America’s history since its creation, so much so, even an amendment of the very Constitution it was founded on is devoted to civilian possession of firearms. It therefore comes as no surprise that any initiative to somehow enforce stricter laws and regulations regarding firearms, or God forbid, strip the people of their Second Amendment right, is faced with some resistance, to say the least. However, following the example of countries that have virtually solved some crime or firearm related issues by employing somewhat unorthodox measures, could potentially reduce the amount of violent crime that is sweeping the US. Gun control has been subject to much debate and controversy in the US and is still somewhat considered

Read More
1432 Words | 6 Pages

Guns are just a tool, like knives and hammers and it completely depends on the people on how they use it. People who support guns and arms say that the Second Amendment secures individual’s right to carry guns with them and that gun rights is needed for self-protection, and was intended for military to have peace and defend the country if needed (Spitzer, 70). Most of the Americans use guns as a source to protect themselves and they believe that gun ownership prevents crime. A study conducted on November 26, 2013 showed that bans on weapons did not significantly affect murder rates at the state level (Lane, 5). Moreover, even if the rules and regulations are executed on gun control, not all criminals obey the law.

Read More
839 Words | 4 Pages

First and foremost, banning guns will not stop criminals from obtaining and committing crimes with them. Furthermore, guns don’t kill people; people kill people. Lastly, guns prevent the government from becoming tyrannical and oppressive. At first, one may think that banning guns would be a superb solution to the growing problem of gun violence.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control

Related Topics

Open Document