More handpicked essays just for you.
Arguments for and against the gun control issue
Arguments for and against the gun control issue
Arguments for and against the gun control issue
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Not having guns may give a sense of security to those paranoid of being harmed by a firearm. Someone should not have to go around worrying about shot. Another benefit of no guns may also provide security to parents who have curious adolescents. They will not need to worry about their child getting into or even maybe injured by the weapon. Yes not allowing guns has its positives, but personally I believe they could be very useful if they are used correctly.
Owning guns or banning them is a highly controversial topic in the United States today. Everytime, there is a mass shooting or violence commited the issue resurfaces. The real question is should the government make strict gun control laws and legislations? Would it help to decrease the crime rate or will it be the opposite effect? The nation is divided on this issue, some believe there should be bans on guns some think there shouldn't be any.
With so many shootings arising these days, many people wonder whether handguns should be banned or not. Some people say it is a part of American history and that they would not be here today without guns. While others believe that the country would be more peaceful and safe if the guns were illegal. The problems that come with banning guns are endless and could possibly cause many more problems than necessary or intended. Having a handgun is a way of protection and self defense.
Attention Getter: Between 1993 and 2003 gun ownership increased by 56 percent, and yet gun violence declined by almost 50 percent (Bandler). Criminals know that if people have guns to protect themselves then they might not be successful in a shooting. Gun Regulation is immoral because Guns are not what kill people. It is the people who use the guns to kill people, who kill people. Many of these people who cause these mass shooting and killings have mental health issues.
Adolf Hitler has said, “To conquer a nation, first disarm the citizens.” Gun Control is wrong and should not be set into action. First and foremost, if guns were to be banned, criminals would still get their hands on them, leaving law abiding citizens defenseless against illegally armed criminals. For instance, drugs are illegal but that does not stop criminals from making, selling and buying them; it is a big problem in today’s society. Secondly, thorough background checks don’t allow felons to purchase weapons, making their only option to steal one, which is much harder and much more risky.
http://ivn.us/2012/07/25/gun-control-an-international-comparison/. I don 't think we should ban all gun ownership - and I don 't think there are very many people who are pushing for it. But even if we did, the history of other nations suggests that it does remedy the stated harm. / / And the NRA was pro gun control until the 1970s: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/adam-winkler/when-the-nra-promoted-gun_b_992043.html. In fact, they didn 't even talk about the Second Amendment before 1977.
Gun control is unnecessary because guns are the cause of death in relatively few violent crimes, gun control takes our rights away, and gun control had proven not to work in places such as the U.K. and Australia where guns are either banned or gun control is strict. First of all, guns are used in a relatively small amount of violent crimes out of all the crimes that occur. Statistics show that guns are the 12th leading cause of death, "Between 1999 and 2013, Americans were 21.5 times more likely to die of heart disease (9,691,733 deaths); 18.7 times more likely to die of malignant tumors (8,458,868 deaths); and 2.4 times more likely to die of diabetes or 2.3 times more likely to die of Alzheimer's (1,080,298 and 1,053,207 respectively) than to die from a firearm (whether by accident, homicide, or suicide)" (CDC). The statistics show that guns are not as dangerous as people think. Even if guns were made difficult to obtain, no matter what criminals will find a way to obtain guns illegally without a license.
In our country we tend to blame our mass shootings and homicides on guns, but without a human behind it guns are harmless. Instead of banning these firearms all together, which may only cause an uprising in illegally owning guns, why don’t we strengthen our gun control laws? By banning people the right to carry and own a gun, we are restricting them of their basic rights. If we increase background checks, insist on mandatory classes and shooting practice, requiring safe and secure gun storage, and engaging in legal and responsible gun dealers.
In the past, the major gun control legislations that have been put into effect have not stopped people from obtaining firearms (Gun Control.) There have also been cases in the past where cities have attempted to ban handguns. After the ban was put into effect, murder rates tended to rise instead of drop, unlike what most people might assume. Crime rates and violence also skyrocketed after the bans were put into effect. Another problem with taking guns away, or banning them, is that the government cannot expect everyone to abide by the laws.
Which true and convincing until you realize that even if we do ban guns then yes criminals can still but they illegally from the black market. But consider this, if a criminal saw a XM-15 Bushmaster or another semi-automatic gun sitting on his table, he can just pick it up and go kill people. But if those weapons were banned he would need to go through many blackmarket and illegal places, which may be unreachable to him because of his lack of knowledge. And to top it off most of the people who do a mass shooting against innocent people are not criminals they are just mentally challenged and they probably won't go through the process of going to a black market or purchasing it illegally if they had to. Of course we will never be able to stop shootings but if we make the gun harder for the shooters to get than we could lessen the gun death rate by a
While some level of restriction and regulation when it comes to firearms is a necessity, having heavy gun related laws is not beneficial to society and teeters dangerously close to infringing on the second amendment to the constitution. The second amendment protects the right of American citizens to bear arms so it would be illegal to outlaw them all together. There are a fair amount of studies and data collections that support the idea that rigorous gun regulations is not beneficial to decreasing gun violence. For example, a recent study published in the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy concluded that there is a negative correlation between gun ownership and violent crime. Even if private gun ownership was outlawed it wouldn’t be very beneficial.
In 2011 the FBI collected data showing that firearms were used in 68% murders, 41% robberies, and 21% aggravated assaults (National Institute of Justice). If we had more or better restrictions on guns then the percentage of murders, robberies, and assaults would be lower. There are over 10,000 homicides committed with firearms (National Institute of Justice). People use guns for bad/evil so there should be restrictions. Studies have shown that most U.S. homicides are committed with handguns (National Institute of Justice).
It has been shown time and time again that gun control has not led to lowered crime rates for extended periods of time. Instead, the opposite has been shown. Often times strict gun control laws can lead to higher violent crime rates than before gun control. It has been proven that gun control laws will not stop people from owning guns, but simply open more opportunity for criminals to purchase and sell them through the black market. The banning of guns in certain places such as schools and businesses will not stop them from being brought there.
The number of incidents of gun violence last year in the United States was about 60,000. In recent years, the number of mass shooting has risen to about one mass shooting per day in the United States. The country is divided with some wanting to reevaluate our gun control laws and either ban or add additional regulations to the purchase of guns. Others say it is our right for Americans to own guns and something the founding fathers considered important to put in the Bill of Rights. The number of firearm sales has risen with the number of mass shooting many Americans question if banning guns or certain guns could help decrease the number of gun violence deaths.
And this is causing a big problem because people are misusing them. Therefore, I believe the guns should be banned in the U.S. It is no exaggeration to say that guns are the key element to cause the instability in the society of U.S. The citizens are possessing guns in U.S. and this is a huge risk for the government and the safety of society itself. According to [http://www.rulen.com/gunban/], 0.004% of the guns-possessions are used in the crime each year, and it is an enormous number.
