ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control

770 Words4 Pages

"Should people have the right to own a gun?" There's a positive side and a negative side to that situation. There's about 40% of all US homes that have guns, even though guns are good for self defense, they are also dangerous. The Supreme Court won in 1939 called "US vs Miller." It was a 2nd amendment to protect only guns that were safe. Dangerous guns like a sawed off shot gun or a silencer can be banned because they are not Military worthy. But since then the Court hasn't had any other cases in the 2nd amendment. Gun control issues are still a popular discussion of the congressional legislation. Federal discussions on gun control focus on the "D.C. handgun ban" often, because congress has direct control over gun laws of the District of Columbia. One of the …show more content…

About 1,500 children are injured by guns every year. In 1996, children have been accidentally shot by guns, about 140 children were, and in 2012 there was 259 children. "Trigger Locks" need a combination and entering the code for using the gun, there are other locks as well. They are needed to prevent children or people who are not authorized to use the gun. Centrists and moderates of both the right and the left generally support the restrictions on juvenile access to guns. Especially in tragedies like Littleton and other deaths regarding guns. You also need a background check to buy a gun. Guns that are sold at gun shows through the dealers are subject to a background check, guns that are sold privately are not. The term "Gun-Show Loophole" means that there isn't a background check when purchasing a gun in a private transaction. Moderate liberals will generally favor for more restrictions on owning a gun while paying lip-service "sportsmen's rights" or respecting "the self-protection right" A compromise is "to extend the waiting periods" before allowing ownership of a gun, to perform background checks of varying degrees of

Show More
Related
485 Words | 2 Pages

One of the

Read More
908 Words | 4 Pages

One of the

Read More
1025 Words | 5 Pages

A very common rebuttal to gun control is the fact that some people solely use guns for self defense. In my opinion, a fair assessment is that if there is no harm being caused to another person (and no reason to suspect otherwise), then owning a gun does not necessarily have to be a bad thing. Because there is an incredible amount of support for gun rights and gun control alike, it is obvious that compromise is necessary. In the United States, guns are cherished and will more than likely never be outright banned. What we can do, though, is be more strict and thorough when dealing with guns.

Read More
678 Words | 3 Pages

Gun control is an issue that has been discussed and analyzed a lot in the past few years. Although our country has tried to establish gun control laws and what to do with guns, the United States still continues to struggle with gun control due to the vast interpretations that people (namely politicians) have on the Second Amendment. It states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” This means that to secure being of a free state, people have the rights to “keep and bear Arms.” In one elucidation, the controversy can be interpreted as asking ourselves where to stop.

Read More
886 Words | 4 Pages

One of the

Read More
1726 Words | 7 Pages

The issue over whether or not it is constitutional for the government to restrict the ability to buy or keep guns has been argued for many years. Debates often flare up because of a tragedy in which someone goes on a rampage with guns and kills or injures multiple people. People who are against gun control claim that the Second Amendment gives them the right to own firearms; however, the Constitution only gives collective rights to possess guns rather than individual. The Second Amendment states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.” (US Const.

Read More
877 Words | 4 Pages

Background checks are not mandatory in the United States to purchase a lethal weapon, which is something that needs to change. According to Elisha Fieldstadt in the article, "Buying a Gun is So Easy 'It Doesn't Make Sense,'" "Only 13 states require a background check to be performed no matter how a gun is sold or what kind of gun it is according to the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence" (Fieldstadt). The amount of blindly sold unlicensed guns is mind-blowing considering the number of mass shootings committed by people with mental illnesses, the most recent being the Parkland High shooter in Florida. Guns have become such an ordinary thing to own, that it is somehow overlooked how deadly these weapons can be in the wrong hands. `Fieldstadt

Read More
1549 Words | 7 Pages

Proponents of more gun control laws believe that the Second Amendment was intended exclusively for militias, that gun restrictions have always existed, and that gun regulations would prevent criminals from possessing firearms. However, Opponents claim that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to own guns, that guns are needed for self-defense, and that gun ownership helps to dissuade crime. Because of this obvious difference, proponents of stricter firearm regulation demand more laws to help prevent mass shooting, and want reform in the area of background checks. Meanwhile, opponents of gun laws often accuse the proponents of manipulating a mass tragedy in order to further strengthen their fight. Gun ownership has been a tradition within the united states since before the country itself was formed.

Read More
550 Words | 3 Pages

“It’s not a gun control problem, it’s a cultural problem. ”(Bob Barr). Gun related accidents are not necessarily caused by the guns themselves but by the people that use them irresponsibly. There are background checks to prevent guns from getting into the wrong hands, but they have proven ineffective.

Read More
1030 Words | 5 Pages

One of the

Read More
516 Words | 3 Pages

Do any of you believe gun control will help or make problems worst? There have been many mass shootings happening all over the world and Obama wants gun control. Gun control is laws that control how guns are sold, used and who can own them. Stricter gun control laws do not infringe the people’s right to bear arms.

Read More
1448 Words | 6 Pages

Gun Control has been a widely controversial topic throughout the United States. While the topic of guns has always been an argument, mass shooting have caused them to become a more popular topic of discussion within the past ten years. Liberalists believe that the root of all the mass shooting is the use of guns; whereas, conservatives believe that guns provide protection for freedom, families, and their own life. The conservatives argue that people kill people, not guns. Even though many people believe gun control will lead to fewer violent deaths, increasing the amount of people with guns obtained legally and safety training will protect the citizens from facing the wrong end of a gun.

Read More
930 Words | 4 Pages

The American people should be allowed to bear arms because it provides safety of our country and ourselves. In today’s world guns are used more than 2.5 million times a year in self-defense. Citizens who abide by the rules use their guns to defend themselves, their

Read More
803 Words | 4 Pages

Not all guns are used for crime or self-defense, some individuals own guns that they use for hunting or sport and it isn't right to take those guns away because of the very small population of gun owners that will use their guns to harm another individual. Only a very small percentage of gun owners intend to commit a violent crime with their weapons, but even with that small percentage we as citizens have the right to own a gun due to the second amendment, the second amendment was intended to protect all able-bodied men so that they could participate in the militia to keep the peace and defend the country if needed, we don't need civilians to defend the country, we have a military to do that for us, but civilians should be allowed to defend their town, city, neighborhood, etc… and keep the peace in these areas if needed, how do you expect them to do that if you take their guns away from them, if someone wants to help keep the peace they need to be allowed to obtain the tools to do that, that includes assault rifles,bump stock, high capacity magazines, these guns/mods seem scary but if we have people with open carry licenses walking around with these things, the criminals will get scared too and they won't want to attack/rob anyone in fear for their own

Read More
1002 Words | 5 Pages

One of the

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control

Related Topics

Open Document