ipl-logo

Gun Control In The 1790s

1025 Words5 Pages

In the 1790s, it was perfectly fine to own a slave, or two, or 50. In the 1790s, it was fine and dandy to marry your 12 year old daughter off to an old man for a couple acres of extra farmland. In the 1790s, Robespierre was going around ordering for thousands of people’s heads to be chopped off--and no one said a thing. In the 1790s, the Bill of Rights was supplemented into the constitution. The second amendment, ratified in 1791, summarily states that the citizens of the United States have the right to bear arms. In pure contrast to this, I believe that the need to stand for more gun control laws being enacted in the United States is more vital now than ever. Times have simply changed since the 1790s, and the need for the second amendment …show more content…

The meaning, the purpose, and the need for the Second Amendment at the time are debatable. The amendment, as written in 1790, is stated as follows: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Adopted on December 15, 1791, these 27 words have been used as the main kindling for the ongoing national debate on gun control. The intended meaning behind these words has been debated in Supreme Court cases such as United States v. Cruikshank, wherein the Court stated, “The right to bear arms is not granted by the Constitution; neither is it in any manner dependent upon that instrument for its existence.” Because of the perspectively interpretational manner in which the amendment was written, it is not clear whether the constitution protects gun ownership for the purpose of maintaining a civilian militia, or for the purpose of protecting individual gun …show more content…

A very common rebuttal to gun control is the fact that some people solely use guns for self defense. In my opinion, a fair assessment is that if there is no harm being caused to another person (and no reason to suspect otherwise), then owning a gun does not necessarily have to be a bad thing. Because there is an incredible amount of support for gun rights and gun control alike, it is obvious that compromise is necessary. In the United States, guns are cherished and will more than likely never be outright banned. What we can do, though, is be more strict and thorough when dealing with guns. Selling guns to a person that is mentally ill, with reason to believe that they are at risk of causing harm to themselves or others, should never, under any circumstances, be

Show More
Related
523 Words | 3 Pages

The thought process behind this is that it will help prevent shootings and keep criminals and mentally ill people from getting guns. Other people want to maintain this right and not be limited. They think that having guns will allow them to protect themselves from criminals and the rise of a tyrannical government. The Second Amendment was adopted into the United States Constitution on December 15, 1791, along with the other amendments in the Bill of

Read More
1278 Words | 6 Pages

In 1789, Congress adopted the Bill of Rights, which included the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment of the bill of rights stated,” A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” During the time at which the second amendment was written in the constitution, war was on the rise with Great Britain. The only way to fight was with an army. As a result, the second amendment came into play.

Read More
1714 Words | 7 Pages

Social change is brought upon as well, with the pressure in choosing a side and speaking up. The second amendment, originally ratified in 1791 for militia use only, then later became the right of the citizens to bear arms in defense. The national firearms act of 1934 imposes taxes on manufacturing, importing, and dealing with firearms. Providing a greater amount of economic stability towards weapons. The firearms protection act revised provisions on the gun control act of 1968.

Read More
923 Words | 4 Pages

In December 1791, the Second Amendment was adopted, along with nine other amendments. The Second amendment gave people the right to keep and bear arms. More precisely, the Second Amendment gave the right for people to bear arms themselves because a well regulated militia was necessary to the security of the free state when the military was not stable enough(Yuhas, 2017). This was adopted 226 years ago. At the time, the founding fathers of America knew that society could be safe when everyone had the right to possess guns.

Read More
527 Words | 3 Pages

In the second amendment, Americans have the right to bear firearms. The Bill of Rights have many laws that shape America to the great country we are today, and if that document wasn’t written, we wouldn’t have the laws that we do today.

Read More
618 Words | 3 Pages

The 2nd amendment is based on the right to keep and bear arms in the common-law. It was influenced by the bill of rights in 1689 (Lund, Winkler, 1). The people should have the right to keep and carry a gun. The people should respect the law and do the right thing with guns. The government is in the right by having people get a permit to have and carry a gun.

Read More
1289 Words | 6 Pages

The Second Amendment as one of the ten Amendments known as the Bill of Rights was ratified on December 15, 1791. The amendment reads in full: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. The Amendment is obviously quite brief: and it is perhaps the very brevity of the statement that has led to so much confusion on its scope and intention. It is certainly a perverse fact that the very brevity of this Amendment has lent itself to literal volumes of interpretations and voluminous arguments to then oppose those interpretations for literally hundreds of years.

Read More
285 Words | 2 Pages

The second amendment states that people have a right to bear arms under a well-regulated militia. This amendment was added to the Bill of Rights because the Americans had just finished fighting The American Revolution with the British government for independence-- Gun control by the British was one of the catalysts of this war. With the revolution fresh in mind, the Americans had registered that there was a need to unite and form a union; however, some Americans felt that a union could result in something similar to the tyranny that the British had imposed on them. They were hesitant of placing the power on a small handful of people-- The second amendment helped take some power from the government and give it to the people.

Read More
1549 Words | 7 Pages

The topic of gun control and firearm regulation has been subject to heated debate for a long while. Both sides have potent arguments, however the core of this issue ultimately boils down to the constitution itself. More specifically the second amendment. This argument quickly becomes quite complicated because gun control and firearm regulation concerns not only the right of citizens, but more importantly the safety of citizens. The second amendment helps to guarantee an imperative right belonging to all citizens.

Read More
1293 Words | 6 Pages

The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Throughout history, there have been numerous attempts to repeal the second amendment, or limit the purchase of firearms, and what such firearms are used for. The second amendment is a constitutional right that shall never be taken away from the United States Constitution. Gun control laws should be left just the way they are, because they ensure enough civil security, and enough security from people without the qualifications of firearm purchase to not possess such equipment.

Read More
1297 Words | 6 Pages

The right to bear arms has been a controversial issue ever since James Madison established it as the second amendment of the constitution. The second amendment states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (US Const. amend. II). Those in favor of the second amendment, believe that arms are used for protection, dangerous situations, and sports.

Read More
715 Words | 3 Pages

When the constitution was written in 1789, the second amendment was written as the right to bear arms, and sense we Americans have had this right sense our nations birth we should continue to have these rights, gun control is unconstitutional because it is stripping away a right from the people. American citizens have the right to bear arms for a reason. When the second amendment was written, the government understood that people need to be able to defend themselves and their families. They also knew what it was like to have their own government oppress them. With the second amendment, the people can defend themselves from their government.

Read More
1991 Words | 8 Pages

The Second Amendment says, “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Gun rights has become the subject of intense political, social, and cultural battles for much of the last century. The pro-gun right side has asserted that the right to arms was absolute, and that any gun control laws infringed that right (Kopel, 2013). This right has been supported by the Supreme Court who has reinforced what has become the American consensus that the Second Amendment allows the right to keep and bear arms, especially for self-defense, and that it is a fundamental individual

Read More
707 Words | 3 Pages

Since the begining of America, the Founding Fathers wrote the strong-standing Bill of Rights with amendments to protect the country that had just recently won their freedom, but one amendment has been the top theme of controversies for centuries. Gun laws offend the Bill of Rights in so many ways and they prove ineffective. Gun Laws are relevant due to thousands of deaths and self-protection. The argument goes on but without guns there is militia, one of the main intents of the Second Amendment. These simple rules can reduce deaths, proven by millions of influential people.

Read More
700 Words | 3 Pages

Furthermore, there can be incidents such as maybe a child getting a hold of the gun and accidentally shooting a family member, or even worse taking the gun to school and causing a tragedy such as the shooting that took place in Columbine High School, Colorado on April 20th, 1999, leaving behind fifteen dead bodies and fifteen mourning families. According to Eliot Spitzer from OXNEWS, “Yes, people pull the trigger - but guns are the instrument of death. Gun control is necessary, and delay means more death and horror.” Just like everything else, being able to own arms comes with its pros and cons. There is definitely a chance of crime, but are we willing to risk it in order to be able to protect ourselves from not only other citizens, but the government as well?

Read More

More about Gun Control In The 1790s

Related Topics

Open Document