Argument For Gun Control
The Second Amendment of the Constitution clearly states "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” Humans having ownership of a gun is a American tradition, thus is older than the country itself, and the second amendment protects this tradition. If America was to enforce more gun control laws, thus would interfere with the second amendment. The Second Amendment is a right therefore a person is not forced
Gun control has been a controversial issue for many years. Many citizens believe that if gun control is strictly enforced it would reduce the threat of crime. People have the right to bear arms for protection, or even just the pleasure of hunting and recreational activity. With the recent events involving firearms and mass shootings, people are skeptical whether to increase or decrease gun laws. Americans have a constitutional right to own handguns and stricter laws and licensing will not effectively save lives.
Majority of the people who oppose gun control believe that it violates the Second Amendment. The Revere Journal says that “In terms of the substance of the Second Amendment, the notion of a militia has no practical meaning today relative to what that term meant in the late 18th century. We are long past the days when farmers left the fields to become de facto soldiers, or when posses were rounded up to chase outlaws, or when settlers were on their own in a hostile environment. Some pretend that a lifestyle that no longer exists still has meaning in the America of the 21st century.” The people that agree on needing strict gun control laws will find a stronger connection to this image compared to the people who oppose
Proponents of more gun control laws believe that the Second Amendment was intended exclusively for militias, that gun restrictions have always existed, and that gun regulations would prevent criminals from possessing firearms. However, Opponents claim that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to own guns, that guns are needed for self-defense, and that gun ownership helps to dissuade crime. Because of this obvious difference, proponents of stricter firearm regulation demand more laws to help prevent mass shooting, and want reform in the area of background checks. Meanwhile, opponents of gun laws often accuse the proponents of manipulating a mass tragedy in order to further strengthen their fight. Gun ownership has been a tradition within the united states since before the country itself was formed.
Gun control is in the forefront of the national new stemming from the mass shootings at schools and public places across the United States. Concerns have been raised both by the public and our nation’s government about gun violence and creating more strict legislation. One of the measures looked at is the use of smart technologies to make guns safer. This call for smart technologies to be incorporated into firearms has a lack of consensus on both sides of the gun control issue making smart technologies a slowly researched and developed area. For this reason, smart gun technologies should not be incorporated into gun control legislation.
America has dealt with protests and arguments ever since the beginning. But one that has caused more disputes than nearly all other conflicts, is gun control. Should America ban guns entirely? should America put tighter restraints on gun owners? Gun control only makes it harder for the everyday citizen to protect themselves while the criminals will always have ways of getting weapons, whether it be from the black market, cross borders, or illegal street sales.
One of the most controversial issues our nation faces today is gun control laws. This controversy has been created due to the different interpretations of the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution which states the right of citizens to bear arms; “a well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (Cornell Law School). Anti-gun control laws believe that the amendment guarantees the right to bear any kind of firearms. On the other hand, we have does that believe that more controls laws should be implemented since the 2nd amendment was for the right of States to have an armed militia during wartime. Both sides have strong point, however, the safety of our children comes first, and a firearm means death in the wrong hands.
The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Many think that tighter regulations are needed to control gun-related violence, but in fact tighter regulations will interfere with the individual’s right to bear arms. Gun control doesn’t work, people will still find a way to carry and conceal a weapon, like during prohibition in the 1920’s when people still found a way to drink alcohol. Many acts of terrorism, such as mass shootings and bombings, are done by people who have easy access to these guns. It is thought by the opposer, that just taking away the guns or making extremely tight regulations on the buying and selling of firearms is the solution to the problem America is facing.
Gun Control The fight over gun control isn’t really about guns itself it is about the rights and safety of the people. Crimes and illegal acts unfortunately occur and happen every day. For a lot of people, guns help them feel safe and secure. It provides a sense of control and ability to protect oneself or others.
According to our Constitution's Second amendment, all citizens have the right to bear arms. This has been an important and very debated topic over the last few years not only in Congress, but throughout the American population. There has been a few memorable instances in our history that has really sparked the fights over gun control. There is a need for stricter laws on gun control in America to keep firearms out of criminals hands and to keep Americans safer. Firearms are extremely lethal and dangerous weapons.
Gun control has been a heated debate for several decades, recently, the discussion surrounding this matter has intensified. The argument seems to be divided into liberal and conservative views, thoughts, and values. A majority of liberals desire stricter gun laws, required mental health check-ups, and longer waiting periods when it comes to purchasing a gun. However, the general census among the Republicans is less governmental interference because they feel that there is already too much governmental control involved. The Republican Party often does not want stricter gun laws because the problem at hand is not the gun itself, but the individual wielding the gun.
The date is February 16th, 2018. The world has only reached its 46th day of the year and yet we have already bore witness to over 30 mass shootings in the United States. While politicians and our own President refuse to accept the real problem with the situation, citizens across the USA are fighting to rid the undeserving of their deadly assault weapons. In a New York Times article titled "Mass Shootings Don 't Have To Be Inevitable", James Steinberg addresses questions we are left to ask when the tragedy strikes and we are desperate for answers. Why is destructive ammunition so easy to obtain?
Gun control is a topic that has been debated over the last few years. It is a subject that many people stand for and against the change in policy. Basically gun control would change the way firearms are regulated, by changing laws or polices that control how they are made, sold, owned, and used by civilians. However by trying to take away firearms from civilians would be infringing upon their rights as United States citizens. There are many ethical reasons why gun control should not be implemented towards law-abiding citizens such as it is hypocritical, neglects the reality of control, and is discriminating against gun owners.
In the midst of such hardships like the Sandy Hook and Aroura Shootings and recently the tragedy in Orlando, gun control has become one of the most controversial topics in our society. Many use the fact of the second amendment that American citizens have the right to bear arms to support the debate on both sides. The ones who are in
Gun Control Gun control has become a polarizing and controversial issue around the globe. There have been many reported issues of mass shootings both in schools and in the public, making it a hot button issue. Proponents argue that, if the government strictly controls the ownership of guns, such tragedies can be prevented. Most Americans have an obsession with guns because the law allows them to do so. Therefore, they are always ready to scoff at anyone trying to control gun ownership.
More about Argument For Gun Control
Gun Control: Americans Should Have The Right To Bear Arms
735 Words | 3 PagesHow Does Gun Control Affect Society
1002 Words | 5 PagesA Rhetorical Analysis Of Mom's Demand Action
1092 Words | 5 PagesArgumentative Essay: Gun Control And Firearm Regulation
1549 Words | 7 PagesGun Control Argumentative Essay
1043 Words | 5 PagesGun Control Argumentative Essay
513 Words | 3 PagesArgumentative Essay Against Gun Control
1108 Words | 5 PagesGun Control Argumentative Essay
730 Words | 3 PagesArguments Against Gun Control
478 Words | 2 PagesPersuasive Essay On Gun Control
550 Words | 3 PagesArgumentative Essay On Gun Control
1845 Words | 8 PagesGun Control Argumentative Essay
949 Words | 4 PagesEthical Arguments Against Gun Control
1264 Words | 6 PagesArgumentative Essay On Gun Control In The United States
1084 Words | 5 PagesArgumentative Essay On Gun Control
1774 Words | 8 Pages