Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
US gun control decrease crime rate
Gun laws debate
Gun laws debate
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The right to bear arms has been a controversial issue ever since James Madison established it as the second amendment of the constitution. The second amendment states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (US Const. amend. II). Those in favor of the second amendment, believe that arms are used for protection, dangerous situations, and sports.
2nd Amendment Gun Control, I believe that we need to have guns. we can do about taking out shootings if you take guns away from good people then they can't defend themselves, then we can't hunt for food, and we can't have protection. we dont want to have no guns and the government to have all the power. even if they try to take the guns away they won't get most of the guns. We need to have that right to have our guns our protection to defend ourselves from robbers and the government if it goes bad.
The use of Gun Control would not take guns away, but it will regulate the manufacturing. By controlling Guns the arms trafficking will lower, but this would not ban the right of possession of legal weapons. Guns should be controlled but not ban. Lowering the use of guns would cause less problems than banning them. In many cases the use of guns is necessary because police don’t get that quickly to where an assault or a crime is being committed.
As Richard Potter states in the article, "What the Founding Fathers Really Meant When They Wrote the Second Amendment," "The Second Amendment was created so that the states could form militias or armies to destroy insurrections or slave rebellions because the federal government had no standing military for a long time" (Potter). The problems that our founding fathers faced in the 1700s are irrelevant today, which are the same problems that made it socially acceptable for everyone to own their own firearm. They had no way of knowing that the current day tragedies would occur because they weren't issues back then, which just questions the importance of that same amendment that much
Adolf Hitler has said, “To conquer a nation, first disarm the citizens.” Gun Control is wrong and should not be set into action. First and foremost, if guns were to be banned, criminals would still get their hands on them, leaving law abiding citizens defenseless against illegally armed criminals. For instance, drugs are illegal but that does not stop criminals from making, selling and buying them; it is a big problem in today’s society. Secondly, thorough background checks don’t allow felons to purchase weapons, making their only option to steal one, which is much harder and much more risky.
The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution states that, “a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. " Some people who advocate for the stronger gun control and extremists who go as far to claim that all guns should be illegal dwell on the part that talks about gun rights in relation to the militia. In a court case dating back to 1939, the Supreme Court ruled that because “the possession of a sawed-off double barrel shotgun does not have a reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia, the Second Amendment does not protect the possession of such an instrument” (United States V. Miller, 1939).
The topic of gun control and firearm regulation has been subject to heated debate for a long while. Both sides have potent arguments, however the core of this issue ultimately boils down to the constitution itself. More specifically the second amendment. This argument quickly becomes quite complicated because gun control and firearm regulation concerns not only the right of citizens, but more importantly the safety of citizens. The second amendment helps to guarantee an imperative right belonging to all citizens.
The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution reads: "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Throughout history, there have been numerous attempts to repeal the second amendment, or limit the purchase of firearms, and what such firearms are used for. The second amendment is a constitutional right that shall never be taken away from the United States Constitution. Gun control laws should be left just the way they are, because they ensure enough civil security, and enough security from people without the qualifications of firearm purchase to not possess such equipment.
The right to bear arms has been a controversial issue ever since James Madison established it as the second amendment of the constitution. The second amendment states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (US Const. amend. II). Those in favor of the second amendment, believe that arms are used for protection, dangerous situations, and sports.
Gun control proponents obviously must not be students of history. There is an old proverb that says, when people do not learn from history, they are doomed to repeat it. They seem to forget a time in America’s past when we tried something very similar to gun control. It was called the “Prohibition”. During the years 1920 to 1933, there was a ban on all things alcoholic; sales, production, consumption, and transport of said substance.
The Second Amendment guarantees law-abiding Americans the Right to Keep and Bear Arms. But over time, gun control laws have placed limits on that freedom. Some politicians and gun control proponents argue that these laws are necessary — even at the cost of infringing upon a fundamental American right. But the fact is, gun control doesn’t work the way advocates argue it does. What is Gun Control?
On many College campuses today even the mention of the word “gun” can lead to a panic for all those that hear it. America is a very different place today than it was only a mere fifty years ago. In the mid 1900s it was not uncommon for high-schools and even some grade-schools to incorporate firearm safety and education courses into physical activity classes. Many students learned how to safely handle and shoot firearms under the direct supervision of a trained adult. So why is it that today even the mention of “gun” leads so many children, students, and adults into a panic?
Do More Guns= More violence? In the year 2010, guns were used in 11,078 murders. Almost 35% of deaths are caused by guns and 68% murders (Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence). Many people think that gun control can be an effective way to reduce the amount of homicides in the world, but are setting gun control laws as efficient as we think?
In 1980, a terrifying 9,524 teenagers lost their lives in vehicle crash accidents. Today, due to better safety features, education and laws, that number has dropped to 2,524 (IIHS). Even as more and more drivers became licensed each year, the number of fatalities went down. There was never a need to ban or restrict the types of vehicles teenagers could drive. In another attempt to save lives, the federal government enacted the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act to reduce the volume and lethality of gun violence by putting heavy restrictions on the types of weapons people could purchase and the accessories they could use.
"’Make no mistake -- they 're coming for our guns. And we freedom-loving gun lovers are totally defenseless! Other than, you know, the guns’ -Stephen Colbert” (Kurtzman 1). There are as many people who advocate for pro gun laws as the people who are opposed, which is the reason why gun control has become one of the most controversial topics as of right now. America is truly split between those who advocate for gun control and those who are opposed.