ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of NAFTA

804 Words4 Pages

Donald Trump signed the first package of documents on the revision of trade relations with Mexico and Canada under the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in January 2017 (Jacobs, Agren, & Rushe, 2017). This agreement has operated for 23 years, but the new president believes that the United States receives an extremely small benefit from it. The ardent supporters of the USA’s exit from NAFTA believe that this measure will lead to the return of one million jobs places in the United States. There are no strong arguments for and against this forecast. NAFTA has both positive and negative points of influence on the US economy.
North American Free Trade Aggregate (NAFTA) is a free trade agreement between Canada, the US and Mexico. The NAFTA agreement was signed on December 17, 1992 and entered into force on January 1, 1994 (NAFTA, 2017). The zone of single market was formed on the territory of these states. In accordance with the …show more content…

The volume of mutual exports between NAFTA countries in 1994-2013 increased from $ 297 billion to $ 1,189 billion. The share of mutual exports over the same period has increased from 41.4% to 49.2% (World Investment Report, 2014). A significant increase in the number of jobs occurred in all countries (primarily in Canada and Mexico) following the results of 20 years of NAFTA. In 1993-2013, the number of jobs in Mexico increased from 31.3 million to 51.5 million, in Canada from 12.8 million to 19.1 million, while in the United States only from 120.0 million people To 155.4 million people (Weaver, 2015). The impact of NAFTA on the economies of member-countries is obvious. The NAFTA agreement was designed to promote economic growth by strengthening competition in the domestic market and encouraging investment from both domestic and foreign sources (Feinberg, Hufbauer, & Schott,

Show More
Related
1456 Words | 6 Pages

As other industries when to bankrupt, maquiladoras profited. NAFTA, which is the North American Free Trade Agreement, contributed to the expansion of the maquiladora industries in the early 1990s resulting in an increase in the maquiladora job market. When American companies started to set up in large numbers, multi-party democracies began to dominate the northern part of Mexico. With the additional influence of American ideals, Mexico’s maquiladoras have strengthened both cities. In the midst of the early 1990s and early 2000s, the growth between that time span for maquiladoras had an annual average rate of 10%.

Read More
576 Words | 3 Pages

The North American Free Trade Agreement, otherwise known as NAFTA, is an international trade agreement between Canada, Mexico, and the United States, designed to remove tariff barriers between all three nations. Signed in the January of 1994 with final implications made in 2008. This has created substantial economic growth for Canada and its other two counterparts. NAFTA has increased trade for the Canadians, and as a result has created lots of jobs for Canada. Overall, NAFTA has been extremely beneficial for Canada since it was established in 1994.

Read More
490 Words | 2 Pages

Along with the Confederation to begin the formation of Canada, the reciprocity debate of 1911 and NAFTA further impacted the development of Canada, because of its economic significance. The reciprocity debate of 1911 and NAFTA pronounced Canada economically through the flourishing of trade with other countries. The reciprocity agreement between Canada and the United States was instated to protect tariffs on goods traded between the two countries. Consequentially, the economy for Canada increased, with exports to the United States growing by 33%, post treaty.

Read More
648 Words | 3 Pages

Since the FTA had shown such great results for Canada as well as the US, the partnership then extended to mexico, further establishing bonds between Canada’s new trading partner. “ The NAFTA superseded the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement (CUFTA), which had come into effect five years earlier on January 1, 1989. At that time, Canada and the United States signed an historic agreement that placed them at the forefront of trade liberalization.” (Government of Canada, Foreign Affairs Trade and Development Canada, Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, Assistant Deputy Minister Corporate Planning, Finance and Information Technology, Deputy Minister of International Trade, Area Management Office. Web.8 Dec. 2015) NAFTA was established only a short five years after the FTA was first signed, the effects from the FTA greatly encouraged NAFTA to then be established so close in time.

Read More
956 Words | 4 Pages

The NAFTA is a free trade agreement that was formed between the three countries of North America, or more specifically Canada, the United States, and Mexico. The main function of NAFTA is to eliminate all trade barriers between the three countries, such as tariffs, to lower the prices of groceries produced by the three countries involved. NAFTA grants the “most-favoured-nation” status to goods produced by the countries involved, which means that these goods must receive equal treatment as domestic goods. They also cannot give a better deal to non-NAFTA countries. This trade agreement greatly benefited the economies of the three countries, and increased the Canadian-Mexican trade eightfold and total merchandise trade between Canada and the United states more than doubled.

Read More
379 Words | 2 Pages

This treaty has been in effect since January 1, 1994. NAFTA was signed to help raise the standard of living for people in Canada. The North American Free Trade Agreement is one of the largest free trade zones. It has laid the foundations for a very strong economic growth and rising prosperity for Canada. NAFTA was designed to remove tariff barriers between Canada, Mexico, and

Read More
349 Words | 2 Pages

The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is an agreement between the United States, Canada and Mexico that sets the rules for international trade and investment. NAFTA region is home to 444.1 million people, 33.3 million of whom live in Canada, 304.1 million in the United States, and 106.7 million in Mexico and producing $17 trillion worth of goods and services. Trade has increased between these countries since NAFTA was put into effect in January, 1994 (United States Trade Representative, “North American Free Trade Agreement”). Opponents of NAFTA include labor groups, environmental, consumer and religious groups. They worry that NAFTA will encourage companies to find the lowest wages possible, destroy American jobs and threaten democratic

Read More
632 Words | 3 Pages

The United States has currently completed free trade agreements with over twenty countries. These deals are believed to contribute to the job loss and wages never increasing. (McBride and

Read More
1909 Words | 8 Pages

North American Free Trade Agreement When campaigning, President Ronald Reagan suggested a North American common market. The Canadian Prime Minister at the time, Brian Mulroney, also showed interest in this idea and this was the beginning of negotiations for what later became known as the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement. The agreement was initially signed in 1988 and took effect in 1989. Later President H.W. Bush entered into negotiations with the President of Mexico to form a trade agreement. Later, Canada requested that the agreement be expanded to include all three countries and this eventually led to The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).

Read More
674 Words | 3 Pages

The question “Is NAFTA good for the U.S.?” can be answered both ways. Yes, the NAFTA is good for the United States, because it allows for trade to be made between Mexico and Canada. Another, is the United States may be limited to specific foods, that cannot be harvest during the winter season. However, Mexico may be able to supply the United States with these specific foods due to the warmer climate.

Read More
573 Words | 3 Pages

(Workman) The things that we import from these countries are things that American citizens use everyday, so it isn’t hard to understand why NAFTA’s renegotiation is such a big deal now. Donald Trump’s early days in office, he threatened to withdraw the U.S. from the trade agreement unless a renegotiation was made, but Canada and Mexico agreed, due to NAFTA being outdated. Renegotiations have begun with all three countries, but it hasn’t been the easiest. There are seven rounds that are currently set.

Read More
804 Words | 4 Pages

Like any decision, agreement, or compromise there are positives and negatives, NAFTA is not an exempt as its issues spark heated debates. Although, it holds a significant place in Canadian history, making it a positive choice. The North American Free Trade Agreement took effect January 1, 1994. It is a trade agreement between all three of countries of North America, which are The United States, Canada and Mexico. The Canadian Prime Minister, Brian Mulroney, the Mexican President, Carlos Salinas de Gortari, and former U.S. President George H. Bush spearheaded the agreement.

Read More
510 Words | 3 Pages

Critics have questioned if TPP would result in the same ending as NAFTA which caused a loss of jobs in the US, however, Obama rebutted with the following statement. He argues that “NAFTA was a different agreement, passed 20 years ago. In fact, this agreement fixes some of what was wrong with NAFTA by making labor and environmental provisions actually enforceable.” He mentioned that not only would it not cause a loss in jobs for the US citizens, it would also benefit the large US companies as work standards for its foreign workers are raised.

Read More
795 Words | 4 Pages

NAFTA took effect in January of 1994.Its main purpose is to increase the agriculture trade and investment among the three countries. According to the department of agriculture, Mexico lost over 900,000 farming jobs in the first decade of NAFTA. ( McKenzie, 2015 ). Before NAFTA people of Mexico grew corn and was able to support their family and country economy. Shortly after NAFTA cheap American corn came pouring in form the borders, which caused a major effect on families that were working in farms in Mexico.

Read More
644 Words | 3 Pages

In 2009, the Harper government successfully implemented free trade agreements with the European Free Trade Association, Peru, and Jordan (Drummond, 2006, 1). The two North American agreements were supposed to further develop the Canadian economy, but it did not bring the results the Canadian government pursued. Canada’s dependence on the U.S market resulted in 86 per cent of Canadian export within the first few years under NAFTA (Drummond, 2006, 1). The dependency on the U.S market convinced the Harper government to target agreements not related to the U.S, similar to what the Trudeau government had done under the Third Option initiative in 1972 (Drummond,

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of NAFTA

Related Topics

Open Document