ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of NAFTA

491 Words2 Pages

The impact on U.S. wages was to be expected. The majority of workers who lost their jobs lost a permanent source of income in the process. It also gave employers the ability to force workers to accept lower wages. As soon as NAFTA was put into effect, U.S. employers began to tell workers that the company will move to Mexico unless they lowered the cost of their wages. These same threats were used against labor unions.
As is to be expected, their are current debates over the benefits and repercussions of the agreement. While 56% of Americans believe that NAFTA is more beneficial for the U.S., the other 33% are left with a foul taste in their mouths. More than half of Republicans believe that Mexico benefits more than we do, with some Democrats …show more content…

One example would be the KORUS FTA. The U.S. - Korean Free Trade Agreement was signed on June 30, 2007 and entered into force on March 15, 2012. This agreement between South Korea and the United States increases not only job opportunities in both nations, but increases economic growth while providing security and shared values between the two. Trump is currently hinting at terminating this agreement, claiming it to be “horrible” and “destroying” America. There couldn’t be a more inopportune time to make such a drastic decision such as this, which North Korea’ threatening with nuclear warfare and China beginning to flex its muscles. South Korea has been an ally to the United States for the last 70 years and no one can predict Trump’s final decision. Another example would be the Australia FTA. The Australia - United States Free Trade Agreement, which came into effect on January 1, 2005 increases the chances for bringing Australian products into the American market. Based off of NAFTA, this agreement between Australia and the United States enhances prospects for Australian services, trade and investment, improves the investment environment between the two countries and promotes increased business

Show More
Related
239 Words | 1 Pages

A tariff is having to pay money or taxes on imported or exported goods. On March 22, 2018, President Donald Trump announced that he will be forcing a tariff on Chinese imported steel and aluminum. His goal is to make America a more rich and stronger nation. Putting a tariff on steel and aluminum would raise the price for all items that contain these products. His goal for America contradicts what the outcome of this tariff will be because it only benefits the wealthy people or upper-class Americans.

Read More
417 Words | 2 Pages

One of the US’s greatest threats of right now is North Korea. North Korea as we know it today was created in aftermath of WWII. The north section was under the control of the Soviet Union, while the south was under the US. This means that North Korea was built under communist rule. This has lead to massive corruption in the system that has lead to the death of thousands of citizens.

Read More
471 Words | 2 Pages

While the abolishment of tariffs between the US and Canada is seen as one of main benefits granted by NAFTA, the FTA originally eliminated most barriers of trade between Canada and the US . NAFTA granted Canada access to the Mexican market and provided export opportunities for in financial and automobile sectors. While the US and Canada had planned for a thorough integration of the Mexican energy trade, they remained unable to break the monopoly of Mexico’s national oil company, Pemex (M. Angeles Villarreal & Ian F. Fergusson, 18). However, NAFTA nonetheless allowed for a greater access to the Mexican energy sector. In 2015, the US was the largest investor in Canada with a total stock of Foreign Direct Investment totalling 325.9 billion whereas

Read More
134 Words | 1 Pages

The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is a free trade agreement between the three North American countries: Canada, United States, and Mexico. The agreement was signed by the presidents and prime minister in 1992, but it came into force by January 1, 1994 after being ratified by each nation’s legislative or parliamentary branch. The main goal of NAFTA was to eliminate trade and investment barriers, and its provisions were divided into four categories: intellectual property, environment, agriculture, and transportation infrastructure. Two decades after the signing, NAFTA has shown its significant impact on the economy of each North American nation. Proponents and critics have long been debating on the effects of NAFTA, and it becomes

Read More
1598 Words | 7 Pages

In his speech in 1992, Quayle opens by saying, “Together, the United States, Japan, and our NATO allies won the Cold War, and we could not have done so without the contributions of Japan” (Quayle 1). Including Japan in the Cold War strategy wasn’t the only notable thing in this agreement. Vogel explains, “The United States also supported Japan’s economic recovery by allowing Japan to limit reparations paid to war victims, by creating liberal international trade regime, and by maintaining open markets at home while tolerating Japanese trade protection and an undervalued yen” (Vogel and Vogel 1). Vice President Quayle again supports this over 40 years later in his speech giving multiple quotes that show how interdependent the Japanese and American economies became. Quayle states, “US exports to Japan have risen since 1985 while Japanese exports to the United States have remained more or less flat.

Read More
674 Words | 3 Pages

The question “Is NAFTA good for the U.S.?” can be answered both ways. Yes, the NAFTA is good for the United States, because it allows for trade to be made between Mexico and Canada. Another, is the United States may be limited to specific foods, that cannot be harvest during the winter season. However, Mexico may be able to supply the United States with these specific foods due to the warmer climate.

Read More
1036 Words | 5 Pages

This, however could be challenged by the World Trade Organization. The other country in NAFTA, Canada, has said it will also pursue trade advantages with Mexico when NAFTA is renegotiated. The article explains that a NAFTA withdrawal by the U.S. “would likely bring up thorny issues that have long dogged relations, including softwood lumber imports from British Columbia” (Mauldin) as well as Canadian cattle which are raised for the U.S beef

Read More
804 Words | 4 Pages

According to CRF Backgrounders it is stated that The NAFTA agreement sparked four million and seven hundred thousand jobs in Canada since 1993. The increase of exports and the increase of jobs are positively correlated, as one goes up the other will follow and vice versa. Which proves that NAFTA helped regenerate Canada’s economy by sparking millions of jobs. In fact, almost one in five jobs in Canada are linked to international trade. " NAFTA means jobs.

Read More
526 Words | 3 Pages

It’s finally happened. North Korea has made their move on the United States. Kim Jong Un said Tuesday, “We will no longer accept the mocking jeers made the the capitalist pigs of the West, and the dignity of this country will stand tall in the face of war!” United States president Donald Trump responded, “Un has made a huge mistake. The United State’s military will fight with every ounce of bravery and courage that runs through each and every soldiers veins.

Read More
1024 Words | 5 Pages

Recently, there was a lot of debates going on about the United States military stationing in Korea. Some questioned that why should America pay for their defence, and showed discomfort. They thought Korea should pay all of the cost for the United States military, but Korea should not be obligated to charge all of them because of Korea’s Environmental problems caused by the United States’ military, America’s benefits on money saving, and for war deterrent purpose. In July 23, 2015, Donald Trump sniped Korea with the issue of heavy reliance on American military.

Read More
1199 Words | 5 Pages

We also risk starting and 2nd Korean war which would not be good for our allies. Ruiz 3 With these three different options and their positive and negative sides as President of the United States of America I choose to make a grand bargain with China. Making a grand bargain with China has the least amount of violence for the United States. Even though we will have to rely a great deal on China it will be worth it to keep our people safe.

Read More
1280 Words | 6 Pages

Since 1945, the United States has acted as the last guarantor of world order and of regional power balances. It has provided security for many countries in an anarchic international system by its forward-leaning military presence, nuclear umbrella, and defense guarantees. But when Trump became the president, he may abandon all of those in order to focus on the United States security. He may abandon the U.S. allies, which cause them feel insecure and feel lost in this anarchy system. For instance, Trump had threatened to cut U.S. military assistance to Japan and even force Japan to develop its own nuclear weapons as a deterrent to North Korean aggression.

Read More
1436 Words | 6 Pages

The Korean War set the stage for future Cold War era relations between the U.S. and the Soviet Union. It devastated both North and South Korea, in terms of their economy, infrastructure, and industry. Economically, South Korea was doing very badly during the 1950s, but was able to eventually transition into a fully democratic state by 1987. Meanwhile, in North Korea, the same economic growth was not observed. The withdrawal of Soviet support, as well as difficult weather conditions, left the North Korean economy in ruins, as they struggled (and still are) with agriculture.

Read More
390 Words | 2 Pages

As expressed from, Russia's president, President Vladimir Putin, “Problems should be solved in dialogue, and North Korea should not be backed into a corner. ”Nevertheless, Donald Trump said that “I am allowing Japan and South Korea to buy a substantially

Read More
919 Words | 4 Pages

Relations have been worsening as China keeps getting pressured to stop North Korea (Minnich ¶14). Other possible side effects of North Korea testing is conflict escalation, preventative wars, and even a humanitarian crisis (Minnich ¶11). Currently, nuclear tests invoke a response of sanctions to which North Korea responds with more nuclear tests. A preventative strike would likely provoke military retaliation (Minnich ¶13). The UN’s response to nuclear tests is tougher sanctions (Minnich ¶45).

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of NAFTA

Related Topics

Open Document