Imagine being put in a predicament whereby you have to make a crucial decision, either by dropping bombs to save countless lives or to let the enemy proceed on brutally killing thousands more…What would you do? Quite frankly I feel that the answer is a “no brainer!” Harry Truman’s decision, the president of the US, on dropping atomic bombs upon Japan in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justified. Japan was the one who first attacked the American Pearl harbour, and up until this time America was completely neutral during the war.
If the bombs were not dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the United States would have lost at least one million American soldiers in a mainland invasion of Japan (Tucker, 5). That stated, dropping the bombs was the only viable option for sparing both American lives, as well as Japanese lives. The dropping of the bombs, albeit horrific, is justifiable because it saved millions of both American and Japanese lives, prevented the waste of valuable resources, and played a significant role in Japan's surrender. Dropping the bombs saved more lives than if the United States had done a land invasion (Walker, 5). If the war had been prolonged, the United States would have lost millions of lives (Tucker, 5); but the Japanese would also suffer.
It 's challenging to look back at events and understand the logic of using an atomic bomb without allowing one scrap of knowledge to creep into our decision making. All of this being said, it 's still possible to come to the conclusion that using this weapon was wrong. The belief that a military blockade would end the war wasn 't believed any more than a military blockade without invasion of Germany would work. The notion that Japan was teetering on surrender is silly.
First off, not disagree with the decisions of the president to drop atomic bombs in Nagasaki, Hiroshima. The reason why I disagree with the atomic weapons that were drawn in japan is because there were thousand of people who were killed, innocent peoples who died in that bomb drops. there were military men who died, but at the same time is was acceptable for united states to fight, and win the war. United states were discomforted the lost thousand of people, including military, 48,000 people from the united states, military, and innocent peoples. It was grave that the united states had thousands of life that are why they proposed the attack besides japan.
During 1945 Nuclear Bombs became widely used throughout World War II so we have to prepare for this because it can happen any day. The first time we used a nuclear bomb was used in July 16, 1945 in New Mexico as a test. Then on August 16, 1945 the world changed when the United States attacked Japan with a nuclear bomb. Since nuclear bombs were invented by us, Russians also invented the dangerous weapon which would lead to the Cold War and us fearing about nuclear mass attacks. Everybody knows the most convenient way to be protected from nuclear bombings was by stop, drop, and tuck.
Even though some believe that dropping the atomic bombs was a bad idea many believe that it helped end the war and save many lives of american soldiers. When the atomic bomb got dropped on japan on august 6, 1945 the goal for the U.S. was to get Japan to surrender and end the war. Before the U.S. dropped the bomb they created it and tested it on july 16, 1945 also before the dropping of the atomic bomb the U.S. gave Japan a chance to surrender. Yet Japan decided to continue fighting both times. Since they did not surrender the U.S. did drop the bombs which left japan's land destroyed and many lives taken and many wounded people.
The United States should have dropped the atomic bomb on Japan because it would show how capable they are to the world. A scientist, Leo Szilard, had a meeting with James Byrnes who was one of President Truman’s advisors. According to Leo Szilard, James Byrnes had concern over the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union was expanding their influence in Asia and Europe, but he does not want that to happen. He believes that if they bomb Japan, then they might impress the Soviet Union.
The Atomic Bombs. The dropping of the atomic bombs on japan was not justified, giving them no warning the U.S. went through and dropped the bomb to end war faster killing thousands of people. Considering the fact that this happened during world war 2, many were left dead, hurt, and with destroyed cities, due to japan not wanting to surrender, citizens of japan and the people in japan were impacted by this action. The United States, dropped theses bombs with not one single warning, above cities, and they did it to impress Russia.
In August 1945, amidst the closing stages of World War II, the United States made the monumental decision to deploy atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan. Leading up to that monumental decision, the Pacific and European Theaters of World War II saw fierce battles between Japan and Allied forces, particularly the United States. The conflict was marked by intense fighting, with significant losses on both sides. Specifically, the Battle of Okinawa, fought from April to June 1945, was one of the bloodiest battles. It involved intense ground combat and heavy casualties on both sides.
On August 6th through 9th, 1945, the United States made a controversial decision that changed the course of history. The Atomic Bombing caused an upshot for America to the Japanese. Four years prior, Japan made a surprise attack on the United States Pacific Naval base, Pearl Harbor, on December 7th, 1941. Although Japan had experienced crucial damage from the atomic bomb, the US decision to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a morally justifiable act of self defense. It prevented further American casualties to ending World War II, which also allowed Japan to be held accountable for their surprise attack on Pearl Harbor.
Over half a century has passed since the dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but the debate over the decision to drop it is still alive and well. While there are valid points for both sides, the evidence and reason shown leans in favor of the side protesting the dropping of the bombs. The atomic bombs have caused so many problems since they have been dropped - problems that could have easily been prevented. If Truman just stopped to assess the situation with a clearer perspective, he would easily be able to see that the dropping of such a bomb would leave lasting psychological and physical negative effects, that Japan was already in a fragile state and would have surrendered soon anyways, and that if he were to go through with the atomic bombs he should have at least warned Japan.
On August 6, 1945, the united states dropped an atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima, immediately killing 80,000 people. Three days later another one was dropped on Nagasaki. Some historians say the bomb was not needed because according to the author “japan was ready to call it quits anyway. More than 60 of its cities had been destroyed by conventional bombing, the home islands were being blocked by the american navy, and the soviet union entered the war by attacking japanese troops in manchuria” (Dietrich 1).
The bombing of Hiroshima on August 6, 1945, during World War II, is still one of the most controversial and tragic events in human history. The decision to drop an atomic bomb on a civilian population raises ethical questions about the use of such destructive weapons in war. Advocates of the bombing argue that it was necessary to bring a quick end to the war and save countless lives that would have been lost in a prolonged conflict. They claim that the shock and awe of the atomic bomb forced Japan to surrender, thus preventing further bloodshed. However, critics argue that the bombing of Hiroshima was a disproportionate and inhumane act that resulted in the deaths of over 100 thousand civilians, many of them women and children.
Though the US attempted to justify that these bombs were to end WW2 as quickly as possible to shorten the extent of people's lives being taken and destroyed, this is entirely untrue; there was a better plan that would have had the same effect. According to President Truman and others as a part of his administration, The atomic bombings were necessary to cut the war in the Pacific short, avoiding the US invasion of Japan and saving thousands upon thousands of Americans. 1
For many decades it has been the president who is given the power to act solely on what he believes is best for our national interest when responding to a nuclear attack. Bruce Blair, in a dialogue about the president’s authority to launch a nuclear strike, clearly states that the system is meant to be quick and precise for time constraints. It is critical for there to be a system that works quickly. When detecting a nuclear attack heading towards the U.S., it is only a matter of minutes before impact. Consider how fast everything must happen in order for a quick reaction.
