ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Paying College Athletes

822 Words4 Pages

When it comes to the debate on whether or not to pay college athletes, Purdue basketball coach Matt Painter offers this thought: “If you want to get paid, or think the system is wrong, go pro. That’s what the pros are for” (DiPrimio). We should not pay college athletes to play sports at their college. You don’t get paid to go to college, you get an education. Not all colleges have the money to be able to pay their athletes the same amount. When you pay the athletes you also have to pay the white athletes and black athletes the same because it is something that could easily not happen. These athletes are already getting state of the art facilities and are probably getting a free education from a scholarship. If these students want to get paid for their sport then …show more content…

The athletes are getting treated better than most students at the school with their nice facilities,top of the line trainers, and tutors. Most regular students have to pay for college themselves or are on financial aid. The athletes though are most likely getting their college paid for, which is saving them a lot of money. The current system of providing student-athletes with help on tuition and room and board has been "overwhelmingly successful in helping people to get an education and go on and do great things in their lives (Torry). Helping athletes pay for living and college has helped them greatly in college and beyond. Ohio State’s President, Michael Drake, pointed out his "father was a student-athlete many years ago," and probably "wouldn't have gone to college otherwise” (Torry). Scholarships are enough to help get students to college and help them get an education. Scholarships help them pay for things they regularly wouldn’t be able to do. Scholarships make sure the money the students get goes towards helping to pay for college and nothing that wouldn’t help the athlete be a

Show More
Related
103 Words | 1 Pages

College schools provide for student athletes enough. They pay for everything provided for the the students whether it’s scholarships or playing in the school games. Through it all it really doesn’t matter if they (the athletes) get paid for, it’s the opportunity that the coaches and university give them to play on the

Read More
487 Words | 2 Pages

Most of the money they need has to come from parents because unlike pro athletes who have extra time to work, the collegiate athletes are working on schooling during

Read More
674 Words | 3 Pages

Are you a students-athlete in need of compensation from the sport you love? There is a possibility of getting this kind of money from playing certain levels in sports. Paying college athletes has been and always will be an ongoing argument. I divine that paying these athletes will help students financial futures, help the costs of abrasions to the students themselves, and bring in prodigious amounts of money. Initially, paying college athletes will help them create a sense of financial awareness.

Read More
956 Words | 4 Pages

Major college football and basketball programs bring in millions of dollars a year for their university and the NCAA. Many people claim the players are the reason these programs make so much money and should be compensated for their work. At first this seems to be logical, but there are many flaws with paying athletes. However, athletes should be able to pursue business opportunities. College athletes should not be paid for playing sports, but should be able to have an outside income.

Read More
1238 Words | 5 Pages

Most athletes are not on full scholarship, which means that they do not get their education 100% for free. Even if some athletes do get any level of scholarship, it is only free for so long. If an athlete does not perform at a high level or if they get hurt, they can easily have that scholarship taken away, and they are left with nothing. These student athletes are supposedly “amateurs” and blessed with “free education,” but in reality, this is not the case. Student athletes should definitely be compensated and recognized for their efforts.

Read More
1300 Words | 6 Pages

(“Crossfire: Hypocritical to not pay College Athletes”) So many of these schools are still helping out their athletes by improving the program they’re in by putting more funding into that program to benefit the future of that program as well as the current generation. So in a way college athletes are being selfish in wanting to benefit off of their playing while they are mostly receiving a free college education as well as better athletic facilities, uniforms, and other equipment used for a sport that they have earned for it. Some players would be satisfied with taking pride in the fact that they’re abilities as an athlete and a team allowed for the legacy of that generation to passed onto the future as they earned that money for the university. Another thing is the benefits they are receiving is great.

Read More
2039 Words | 9 Pages

It would not be fair for the students if they would not receive any income for the clubs or other things they are involved in. Paying these athletes would not be fair and it would damage all college

Read More
1829 Words | 8 Pages

Each year around the world, collegiate student-athletes participate in different sports and currently they do not receive paychecks for their performances. A lot of people have posed the question, should college athletes be paid? The answer to the question is that they should not get paid. The NCAA gives the student-athletes a lot of handouts that includes full-rides to any college of their choice which includes the meal plans, housing, books, and so on. If they were paid to play then they would feel as if they are professional athletes in which they are just athletes playing at the college level.

Read More
1233 Words | 5 Pages

People have debated the century long question about if college athletes should be paid, and in recent years the question has become more and more prominent. The short answer is no, and the evidence that supports that argument is plentiful. Although there are many people who do support the counterargument that college athletes should be paid due to their such tight schedules. There is an argument for both sides of the issue regarding college athletics compensation, but only one side stands higher than the other. That side supports that college athletes should not be getting paid while they attend college just because they play their sport on the side.

Read More
858 Words | 4 Pages

Yes, they are receiving a free education, but how could one possibly take advantage of this when the average college athlete is spending 40-50 hours a week in training, practice or at a game? To me, the notion that they are being given an education as payment seems selfish. With that logic, it seems like the colleges are really just paying

Read More
461 Words | 2 Pages

And most of them work hard in practice and play great in the game. Colleges should help their athletes by paying them. College athletes should be paid. Some athletes go to the pros before graduating college. Paying the athletes will make them work harder in practice and in school, because if they work harder in practice they will play harder and maybe get paid more.

Read More
567 Words | 3 Pages

The first reason why college athletes should not be paid is because the sport that they play is not a job, it is a privilege. College athletics is something that only a handful of people get to experience. You’re lucky to be able to even play a college sport, let alone get paid for doing it. Some people don’t realize how lucky they are

Read More
1984 Words | 8 Pages

Just like any other college student, a college athlete’s most important reason for going to college should be to receive an education. Playing a sport in college is a privilege and a very small number of college students are given that privilege. Scholarships are given out to reward student athletes for their academic and sporting achievements in high school. One way that colleges do this is by providing tuition, room and board assistance to these students. This “reward” is often times of a very high monetary value.

Read More
1538 Words | 7 Pages

College athletes put in a lot of time, effort, and work into the sport they’ve played since they were young, but they aren’t getting paid for it. These student athletes deserve to be paid because they put in countless hours of hard work and balance sports with school work. The first reason athletes in college do deserve to be compensated is because they don 't have time to fit in work with a school and athletic schedule. College athletes don’t have time to get a real job. Student athletes have a very busy schedule, they don’t have time to fit in a job.

Read More
1109 Words | 5 Pages

Should College Athletes Be Paid The issue of paying college athletes is debatable; there are many different facts and opinions on both sides. There is a number of ways a college athlete could encounter trouble receiving a payment. However, players like Johnny Manziel get paid under the table and do not get caught. The two sides to this issue are obvious, for or against but the “for” side is slightly more biased.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Paying College Athletes

Related Topics

Open Document