The Pros And Cons Of Selective Incorporation

670 Words3 Pages

Imagine a nation where every single person had to follow a religion the government deemed acceptable, but not just that imagine a nation where the masses did not have a voice, where there would be no peaceful assembly, no printed press, almost no real freedoms; all of these privileges that we enjoy in our great country today were gifted to us by our founding fathers within the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights is a set of amendments or better known as laws which give each person their unalienable rights within any of the fifty states in our country. These rights are protected by a constitutional doctrine known as Selective Incorporation, which prevents any state to create laws that would take away a persons constitutional rights. The doctrine was put in place after the civil war when the southern states had made their own laws that prevented former …show more content…

Even though I personally believe spreading hate into the world is one of the worst things an individual can do it is still wrong to try to shut down a person’s freedom to express their own beliefs no matter how disappointing their opinion may be. My thought process must have been similar to the judges on the Supreme Court during this case because the court ruled in favor of Mr. Neal claiming that the law created by Minnesota violated the first amendment of the Bill of Rights denying Mr. Neal’s freedom of speech and creating the essence of censorship by placing this law into