Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Negative effects of civil war
Civil war effects on society
Negative effects of civil war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
According to dictionary.com, A Confederate Government is a group of nations or states, or a government encompassing several states or political divisions, in which the states retain considerable independence. The members of a confederation often delegate only a few powers to the central authority. Union Government is a group of states or nations that are ruled by one central power or that all agree to work together. As you could tell, the south had a confederate style of government. Although they had a president, the states held more individual power.
The Louisiana Purchase was a “land deal” made between France and the U.S. in December of 1803, where France sold America 828,000 miles of land along the west side of the Mississippi River for 15 million dollars (approximately 4 cents per acre). People regard it as Thomas Jefferson’s greatest achievement because of how drastically it changed the United States. The purchase greatly expanded America and brought many other benefits along with it. Although it was definitely a major benefit to the United States, even Jefferson had his doubts about the purchase. But despite many doubts, the U.S. made the decision to ratify the purchase, and because of that decision, America has changed for the better.
The Emancipation Proclamation was Lincoln’s order to free slaves and curry favor with the rest of the nation. This order came about January 1st of 1863 and only addressed the states in rebellion. It declared that any state in rebellion to the union was no longer capable of owning slaves and any slaves in said states were to be freed. These states included Arkansas, Texas, Louisiana (barring some counties), Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, South Carolina, North Carolina, Georgia and Virginia. It also encouraged the now free individuals to enlist in the army and help fight for the others not protected in this order.
Slavery grow rapidly in the southern colonies than the northern colonies for the reason that southern colonies slave work year round to grow crop like rice, they have the ideal season for work year round that the northern colonies didn’t have. For example on page 75 “ Unlike cultivating wheat or corn in the north, growing rice demanded backbreaking year- round labor, slave had to clear the swampy lowlands in winter, build dykes to keep seawater out of the fields, and plant rice in shallow trenches in the spring. In late summer, the harvested the crop. In the fall, they pounded the rice kernels with wooden mortals and pestles. Come wintertime they turned the soil to prepare it for a new round of planting.
Tensions rose across the country from those in support support of slavery and those opposed. Many states wanted to outlaw slavery while others adamantly defended it because it was the main institution with a high and consistent revenue. Ultimately, the disagreements over slavery are what lead to the Civil War. The country divided into an “Us versus Them” situation which lead to both sides having growing support for their views and making the groups less susceptible to an agreement. In 1862, President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation which freed slaves from confederate states.
Both sides involved in the civil war had distinct advantages and disadvantages, which all played a part to decide the outcome of the civil war. The north for example, was an economic and industrial powerhouse. They also had excellent communication and transportation networks to efficiently organize their army. The south however, had a home advantage where they could get supplies from anywhere they pleased. Additionally, Southern generals were vastly superior to their northern counterparts.
The treatment of slaves between the North and the South was drastically different. Slaves in the North typically lived in the same house as their master and worked by themselves, or in small groups (pg. 94). Slaves in the South tended to live in large plantations in which they were housed in plantation outbuildings (pg. 104). The difference between the North and the South in housing and working environment had a direct effect on the integration of African Americans into their new American society. When they were housed in the North with their masters and had limited exposure to other slaves, they tended to adopt the ways of their masters.
The end result of the Dred Scott decision was Chief Justice Roger Taney 's decision that Congress did not possess the jurisdiction to stop slavery from spreading into other territories, even if they were considered free. Even worse, any free Black could now be allowably forced into slavery. Being forced into slavery was also seen as being beneficial to the free Blacks. Instead of reaching a decision as President Buchanan had hoped, it had started a rapid expansion of the conflict. This rapid expansion over the issue of slavery eventually led to the Civil War.
Resistance is a constant feature of American slavery. The African-Americans have resisted and rebelled against their oppressors in many different ways. Suicide has been the most common way to resist slavery, in addition to escaping from the traders before reaching the slaveholders’ houses, or even reaching the European coats. In her novel, Jacobs mentions several different forms of resisting slavery: buying itself, using violence and running away.
To a greater extent, slavery was the greatest cause of the outbreak of the civil war in 1860. Disputes of slavery caused economic and political troubles between the northern and southern states leading up to the civil war. The fact the the northern and southern states were different in almost every way caused them to turn out like completely different territories, one of their greatest differences was the fact that most southern states economy relied on hard labour, agricultural jobs like tobacco in Maryland, and cotton in Virginia; this caused their economy to be more based on the labour of slaves than the more developed territories in the north (Harrold), who after this time was starting to not need the slave labour in their territories because after early 1800’s, the industrial revolution had been spreading to America, and the country developed very quickly. But in this expansion, only the north states were getting the effect of the industrial revolution, meaning the north would not need slave
In addition, the historical neglect of slavery is used as a tool in for white supremacy. Through ignorance, Americans show a common theme of showing pride in their heritage of the Confederacy and fail to see the bigger picture of it. They buy and wear merchandise such as flags, shirts, hoodies, hats, etc… proudly, with the incomprehension of the damage it is doing. We have failed to properly display the Confederacy as the villain, or even to show that the preservation of slavery was the reason for the Confederacy to secede from the Union in the first place. Where slavery has mostly been condemned, the defenders in history have not been condemned but instead have their actions be viewed as a part of American history.
In the 1800’s slavery was a lifestyle in the southern parts of America. White Americans saw African Americans as inferior beings to them, this was especially seen when they used their power to harshly and constantly abuse in order to keep them working. Slavery was more profitable in the south because of the ideal climate and large amount of land for farming, so having slaves farm and grow cash crops led southerners to become very rich. The Northern economy was more based on manufacturing, so they did not need slaves as much. As years progressed tensions began over keeping slavery in the United States and started the civil war.
Have you ever wondered how life was for the slaves in the South? Slaves in the South suffered through many consequences. For example, they suffered through many whippings with cow skin if they didn't obey their master, they also got separated from their family mostly the fathers, so, they can be sold to a very mean slave owner. Even if they were living a miserable life on the farms, they had their own culture and they managed to even get married in the farmland or where they worked. Not only did the slaves live on the farm.
This documentary discusses owning slaves, and I do not think owning slaves was right or that it is a good idea. I think owning slaves was degrading and inhumane because of how they were treated. I believe that no one should have the right to possess individuals. Also, I read an article which talked about back in 1600’s slavery flourished in the South; everybody had large plantations growing cotton, tobacco, and other crops. Plus, the plantations required many laborers and slavery was not profitable in the North, because economic interest centered on small farms and industries.
I agree that slavery is inhumane for the slave owners and for their slaves. For slave, they were treated as animals, bound by chains, whipped, receive inhuman treatment, torture and torture, wanton abuse, they don’t even have a freedom. In the eyes of slave owners, they are nothing more than a bunch of things that can be replaced if they die. Become slaves and separate their wives from their children, when their children are born, they are taken away from their parents and sold to other whites, even if they are of mixed blood. They don’t have any personal space or freedom.