The Pros And Cons Of Standardized Testing

The Holland Typology test may be useful for some; however, standardized testing has always been a highly questionable and well-debated topic. Holland describes consistency as the degree of correspondence between personality types or bounded by environmental models (Alvi, Khan, Hussain, & Baig, 1988). Some matches up of types are additionally closer related than others. Standardized testing is most often associated by a set of organized standards or educational framework, which prepare teachers with direction for what and when something needs to be taught (Meador, 2016). Along with intelligence, achievement and aptitude test. Each test has different orientations and purposes. Standardized tests, when used properly and for the correct reasons, can well enough determine a student's current elevation of strengths and weaknesses and his or her aptitude for clear understandings

Minority females go through a double jeopardy as they often score below than both white females and males of their own racial or ethnic group (Connor & Vargyas, 2014). Differentials based on race and national origins are well noted and have been the problem of prosecution and trained legal attention. Standardized test tests can be of use as rough guides to establish if a child is ready to proceed to another grade or level (Sample, 2010). The desire in standardized testing is to have ample numbers of students write a single test, then to measure any single score against all others to see how an individual’s score compares to the large sample (Poulsen & Hewson, 2014). Women are generally aimed for education, office occupations and social welfare, much as men are ordinarily pointed toward careers is medicine, management, engineering or technical fields (Connor & Vargyas,