ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb

585 Words3 Pages

The Atomic Bomb We all know that the droppings of the A-bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki ended World War 2, but was it really the right thing to do? World war 2 was one of the most devastating wars fought in the history of mankind, resulting in the death of millions on both sides of the war. The dropping of the A-bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was the best strategic and political thing to do, but it might not have been the most moral thing to do. In the month of April of 1945, the war in Europe was coming to an end with both America, and Russia conducting attacks against Germany on two fronts, but the war going on in the Pacific was still raging on. Then shortly after April 12th, 1945, when President Roosevelt died of a cerebral hemorrhage, Vice President Harry Truman took office. When President Truman first learns about the atomic bomb, he started to see political benefits that could that be caused by using the bomb to end the war against Japan, such as stopping Russia from taking more control over Europe. …show more content…

According to a graph on page 5, the predicted amount of American lives lost in Operation Olympic would of be around 100,000 and about 450,000 captured/wounded. Also, there is a predicted amount of 2 million lives lost on the Japanese side. But what actually happened when the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima 7sq miles were demolished, 70,000 people killed/missing, and 70,000 injured, all within a matter of seconds. Before President Truman made his made his decision to continue with the planned invasion or drop the atomic bomb, the U.S. was conducting fire bombings. These fire bombings would cover 15sq miles, and caused 83,000 dead/missing persons and 102,000 wounded persons. The fire bombings would cover a littler more than twice amount of ground of the a-bomb and would cause 13,000 more dead/missing persons, as well as 32,000 more wounded

Show More
Related
719 Words | 3 Pages

The Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Harry S. Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb is one of the biggest and deadliest controversial turning points in history. America’s president, Truman, decided that on August 6, 1945, the atomic bomb would be dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki to end World War II. President Truman’s choice to drop the bomb on Japan was considered one of the most debatable turning points. The settlement to drop this bomb was a wrong decision because this bomb killed more than 70,000 innocent people with 10,000’s dying later. Also, bombing a country that was going to surrender in a few months would not be necessary, and last but not least, the atomic bomb could give ideas for the world to start nuclear warfare.

Read More
345 Words | 2 Pages

The dropping of the bombs were necessary and fair due to the refusal of the Japanese to surrender, the millions of lives saved by a quick end to the war, and the warnings given to the Japanese. To begin, the Japanese soldiers have it ingrained in their brains that it is dishonorable to surrender. The author of Drop the Bomb as agreed by saying that “the Japanese have demonstrated a willingness to fight to the death”. During the war there were many times for the Japanese to surrender, but it was never done. With this in mind, they would have continued to drag out the war, which shows that dropping the bombs sped up the war which lessened the casualties.

Read More
216 Words | 1 Pages

It 's challenging to look back at events and understand the logic of using an atomic bomb without allowing one scrap of knowledge to creep into our decision making. All of this being said, it 's still possible to come to the conclusion that using this weapon was wrong. The belief that a military blockade would end the war wasn 't believed any more than a military blockade without invasion of Germany would work. The notion that Japan was teetering on surrender is silly.

Read More
856 Words | 4 Pages

When Japan refused to surrender unconditionally the U.S. decided to nuke them, this was very controversial but looking back the U.S. made the right decision. Although it was seen as immoral, the U.S. made the right decision because if the U.S. didn’t nuke Japan, Russia would of taken over Asia and quite possibly Europe, it was the quickest way to end the war and the one that cost the least American lives, and nukes are weapons of war and Japan was the enemy. If the U.S. didn’t drop the atomic bomb Russia would of taken over Asia and quite possibly Europe. In document E “Mr. Byrnes was much concerned about the spreading of Russian influence in Europe.” The Mr. Byrnes it talks about was then announced Secretary of state 2 weeks after.

Read More
676 Words | 3 Pages

With a demonstration it would for one, give the Japanese proof of the bomb and two, show them how destructive the bomb is. Furthermore, an attack on civilians is not regarded, despite the extent they are involved in the war effort. The military is a force that knows that they are putting their life on the line for their country, willingly making a commitment and understanding death is a possibility. However civilians are entirely different, as their involvement in war is scarce. They cannot be considered necessary to a war effort.

Read More
1232 Words | 5 Pages

Although Harry S. Truman said that the bombs saved the Japanese from thousands of casualties, it caused even more, and especially worse suffering. In Hiroshima, the death toll was between 80,000 to 120,000 people. The Nagasaki bomb killed 35,000 to 74,000. Even after the bombing there were more people dying from radiation, scarcity of food, and overall horrible living conditions. John Hall on Daily Mail showed pictures of the aftermath of the bombings, and corpses lying in rubble, other people barely surviving.

Read More
482 Words | 2 Pages

On August 6,1945 Hiroshima and Nagasaki were attacked by atomic bombs that were dropped by the U.S Military. Over 200,000 people were killed. The United States used the bomb to end the war with Japan, which began in 1941 when Japan launched an unprovoked attack on Pearl Harbor. Many people believe that dropping the atomic bombs was the right thing to do because if they did not use it, there would be four more years of fighting and hundreds of thousands more US soldiers would have died because the Japanese refused to surrender.

Read More
757 Words | 4 Pages

During WWII there were many deaths and terrible battles but the worst of all of them was America dropping the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This tactic of bombing a city was the wrong decision by America, it was completely barbaric and was an act of total war something no country should ever use. The main issues with this decision was that it wasn’t an attack on a military base like Pearl Harbor but it was an attack on a populated city and Japan was prepared to surrender because they knew America and the Allied Powers would win the war. The main argument others have is that the Atomic bomb saved lives by creating a fast end to the war so it wouldn’t be strung out resulting in more deaths on both sides but Japan was prepared to surrender

Read More
865 Words | 4 Pages

World War II was the bloodiest war in world history that led to reorientation of both economic and social axiomatic patterns such as new conserving methods and contributing to the war effort. The violence between the United States and Japan, beginning with the bombing of Pearl Harbor, led to hundreds of thousands of casualties for both countries. To ensure a rapid victory for the United States, atomic bombs were dropped at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. These nuclear bombs were authorized, to be used at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, by President Harry Truman. The decision to deploy atomic bombs in Japan was the wrong decision, due to the dwindling Japanese military power already leading to a surrender, the massive amounts of destruction brought upon Japan

Read More
712 Words | 3 Pages

Even though dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki killed thousands of Japanese citizens in a matter of seconds, it was still justified. On December 7, 1941, Japan bombed Pearl Harbor, a naval base on one of the Hawaiian Islands, thus plunging the US into the biggest war the world had ever seen. President Harry S. Truman decided to use the atomic bombs to save American lives by not invading Japan. American soldiers were able to return to their wives and children since they did not have to fight in the war any longer. The war ended just six days after the bombs were dropped.

Read More
918 Words | 4 Pages

JFK once said, " Mankind must put an end to war or war will put an end to mankind." In 1939 Albert Einstein had written the US president of the potential to build a nuclear weapon. The US entrance into the war on December 7th of 1941 led to the president creating the Manhattan Project in 1942 where the atomic bomb was developed. On August 6th of 1945 US president Truman ordered the bombing of Hiroshima using the atomic bomb, 3 days later he ordered a second bomb to be dropped in Nagasaki. The US was justified in using the atomic bomb to end WWII because, America's technology was their greatest achievement, during the time of war death is inevitable, and Japan ignored all warnings given by America.

Read More
985 Words | 4 Pages

Four years later into the war the United States on August 6, 1945 dropped the world’s first arranged atomic bomb over Hiroshima in Japan. The explosion distributed through ninety percent of the city and instantly killed 80,000 people. Thousands of innocent lives would later die from radiation exposure. Without any hesitation three days later, the second bomb was released into Japan this time in Nagasaki, terminating roughly 40,000 people (Staff, History.com, 2015). This being said I would like to start off by saying that I think it is just incredibly terrible how far war can take a nation into the brink of having no other choice but leading into the manslaughter of thousands of people.

Read More
1673 Words | 7 Pages

Atomic Bomb: Was it morally and mathematically justifiable? September 1, 1939, was the start of a tragedy to come. Adolf Hitler, the dictator of Germany, invaded their neighbor, Poland; it led Great Britain and France to declare war on Germany. Hitler had plans to consolidate Europe and eventually world domination. In 1941, Japan attacked US Navy Port, Pearl Harbor, that ultimately made the United States enter the war.

Read More
581 Words | 3 Pages

But even though the invasion would’ve cost the lives of millions, the atomic bombing of over 100,000 cities had lost nearly 60 percent of their populace and reduced them to rubble. This was on Atomic Salvation: How the A-Bomb Saved the Lives of 32 Million People by Tom Lewis. Also, the atomic bomb caused more lives than the invasion would have and it affected their environment which caused even more lives. Evidence to support this is that there were approximately 80,000 deaths in just the first few minutes. Thousands died later from radiation sickness caused by the bomb.

Read More
403 Words | 2 Pages

Opinion Atomic Bomb Paper - Unassisted Have you ever wondered about the Atomic Bomb? Today I am going to tell you why I think the Atomic Bomb was a good idea to end World War I. Some people do not think it was a good idea to end World War ll, but I think it saved so many American lives. Let me tell you why.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb

Open Document