ipl-logo

To What Extent Was The Atomic Bomb A Morally Wrong Decision

581 Words3 Pages

President Truman’s decision to use the Atomic Bomb on Japan was a controversial choice driven by the potential loss of life and the Japanese government's refusal to surrender, aiming to bring a swift end to the war. I believe dropping the atomic bomb was a morally wrong decision. There will be a lot of discussion of the words “mortality” and “immoral” in which mortality, according to the National Cancer Institute, refers to the state of being mortal “destined to die”. This meaning could also be used for the death rate, or the number of deaths in a certain group of people who died in a certain period of time. The term “immoral” means morally wrong, or outside society’s standards of acceptable, honest, and moral behavior. This information was found in the Cambridge Dictionary. There’s many reasons why I say dropping the atomic bomb was a morally wrong decision. My first reason is because of the loss of civilian lives. I say this because over 140,000 civilians have lost their lives. 80,000 had lost their lives instantly. The temperature of the bomb at ground level reached 7,000 degrees Fahrenheit in less than a second. It vaporized people …show more content…

But even though the invasion would’ve cost the lives of millions, the atomic bombing of over 100,000 cities had lost nearly 60 percent of their populace and reduced them to rubble. This was on Atomic Salvation: How the A-Bomb Saved the Lives of 32 Million People by Tom Lewis. Also, the atomic bomb caused more lives than the invasion would have and it affected their environment which caused even more lives. Evidence to support this is that there were approximately 80,000 deaths in just the first few minutes. Thousands died later from radiation sickness caused by the bomb. Information from the Truman Library: Decision to Drop the Atomic

Show More
Related
642 Words | 3 Pages

Prompt and Utter Destruction: Truman and the Use of Atomic Bombs Against Japan is a book by J. Samuel Walker. He writes about the decision that Truman had to make during World War Two. The Decision that Truman had to make was whether or not the United States should use atomic bombs against Japan. The argument was that if the atomic bombs were used, then Japan would be forced to surrender. “Truman could have decided against it.

Read More
424 Words | 2 Pages

The Bombing of Hiroshima The bombing of Hiroshima was the right thing to do due to the military lives that were going to be lost if the bomb did not get dropped, America also wanted to impress Russia or intimidate them by dropping it and the president saw this opportunity to make japan surrender as well. This all supports the main point on why it was the right thing to do but many to all Japanese say otherwise Lots of soldiers lost their lives because of the conflict with japan, in document B, it states,”123,000 Japanese and Americans killed each other”. Paul Fussell, a WWII soldier also stated, ”war is immoral, war is cruel”. This is speaking for all the soldiers in the war or most of them, this also means that he doesn’t like war and it would

Read More
697 Words | 3 Pages

Kids and others frightened at the sights they saw when the blackness rose, skin burned off, people holding an organ, and many other frightening things. Was the dropping the bomb in both Hiroshima and Nagasaki justified? Do others believe it was a good idea? The correct answer is we don’t know. Just like many other political statements, millions disagree on this topic.

Read More
674 Words | 3 Pages

Today, Many historians argue that America should not have dropped the bomb on Japan. People believe that is was morally incorrect for Americans to completely destroy two cities in Japan with many civilians. Even though dropping the atomic bombs was a violation of International Law, it was justified because it saved more lives than killed, it was the only way the Japanese would surrender and it made America more powerful. While the dropping of the bomb seems like it killed so many people, it actually saved more lives.

Read More
179 Words | 1 Pages

President Harry Truman was justified in dropping the atomic bomb since it saved millions of American lives by ending the war as soon as possible, and established the United States as the greatest country in the world. With the bomb, America could “attack those that have hurt [America]” and save many American lives (Truman, Doc A). As part as revenge for Pearl Harbor, America was able to redeem itself against Japan with this bomb. It would make a statement to the world and force an unconditional surrender from Japan, as fast as possible. That would end the war and potentially save millions of young American soldiers.

Read More
791 Words | 4 Pages

In document 4, it says, “This is a crime against God and humanity which strikes at the very basis of moral existence. “ This demonstrates that the use of the bomb has gone against the basic rules of life, as it was too inhumane. As the war has already ended, the controversies surrounding the dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki still

Read More
608 Words | 3 Pages

WWII-Atomic Bomb Thousands and thousands of kids, families gone in seconds from one bomb that was ordered to hit the enemy forces by the United States president. The U.S had a tough decision to make when fighting the second world war and when the first know thing was made called the atomic bomb. The question is, was president Truman justified in dropping the two atomic bombs and killing thousands of lives in a blink of an eye to end the war? Truman wasn’t justified in dropping the bomb because of all the lives that had to be sacrificed. If he just stuck to the original plan and kept going from island to island then maybe less lives would of been taken.

Read More
602 Words | 3 Pages

Although it was inhumane and horrific, we were justified in dropping the atomic bombs because American soldiers were being tortured, American bodies were disrespected after death, and the bombs ended the war preventing more American casualties. The first reason that America was justified in dropping the atomic bombs is that American soldiers that were captured in Japan were being tortured. When Japanese soldiers captured American soldiers, they needed some way of trying to get them to give up valuable information because the U.S soldiers wouldn’t just tell them for no reason. So they began torturing them in hopes they’d crack. Document 2 showed the numerous

Read More
617 Words | 3 Pages

In the year of 1945, the U.S. had dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima, causing a lot of damage. The U.S. was justified when dropping the atomic bomb on Hiroshima because the Japanese was already ready to surrender and the japanese was already defeated, so there was no point. The bomb killed so many lives that shouldn't have been taken. Thousands of innocent people died or got wounded very badly, which was very unnecessary. Some people even became really sick as well, which was completely unnecessary.

Read More
1403 Words | 6 Pages

The use of the atomic bomb when strategically compared to a land invasion, in fact prevented the loss of any U.S. soldiers lives, as well as the death of many Japanese citizens. Excerpts from “Three Narratives of our Humanity” by John W, debates whether or not the nuclear bombing was necessary to shock the Japanese into surrender and describes how the Japanese recall the war through a lens of their own victimization. An excerpt claims, “it is argued that the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima was necessary to shock the Japanese to surrender”. This presents a compelling argument supporting the ethicality of the bombings through its logical and strategic worth.

Read More
937 Words | 4 Pages

Although some people agree that dropping the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima was the right thing to do as it ensured their power and ended the

Read More
992 Words | 4 Pages

Margaret Thatcher, former Prime Minister of Great Britain, delivered a eulogy on June 11, 2004, in honor of the late President Ronald Reagan that asserts his huge impact on America and on the world. Thatcher develops her speech by talking about the former president’s unwavering optimism and outstanding achievements. She reiterates the influential accomplishments of Reagan in a positive, upbeat tone that is directed toward the American people. Thatcher uses ethos, repetition, and precise diction in order to effectively highlight how impactful Reagan was during his presidency. Margaret Thatcher uses ethos to establish her validity as the speaker, which assists her in conveying to the audience that Reagan was an influential president.

Read More
226 Words | 1 Pages

The dropping of the atomic bombs was necessary to bring an end to the war. The Americans had lost an estimated 418,000 troops. The Americans could never have known how many people would be killed between the two bombs. The fact of the matter remains that an estimated 135,000 people were killed in Hiroshima and approximately between 50,000 to 74,000 were killed on the hit at Nagasaki.

Read More
587 Words | 3 Pages

The decision to drop the atomic bomb in World War II remains one of the most controversial and debated events in history. During this event, Japan was in a world conflict. The decision to drop the atomic bomb during World War II raises significant ethical concerns and alternative perspectives that challenge the necessity and morality of devastating acts. There are many reasons why we shouldn't have dropped it. The reason is that the bombings killed 200,000 to 240,000 Japanese.

Read More
628 Words | 3 Pages

The use of the atomic bomb by the United States in 1945 was necessary to end the war quickly as well as save more lives than it took. My reasoning for the atomic bomb use being justified is it ended the war quick, Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, and it caused many deaths but saved more people in the long run. President Harry Truman made a justified decision to drop the atomic bomb considering the context

Read More

More about To What Extent Was The Atomic Bomb A Morally Wrong Decision

Open Document