ipl-logo

To What Extent Was The Atomic Bomb A Morally Wrong Decision

581 Words3 Pages

President Truman’s decision to use the Atomic Bomb on Japan was a controversial choice driven by the potential loss of life and the Japanese government's refusal to surrender, aiming to bring a swift end to the war. I believe dropping the atomic bomb was a morally wrong decision. There will be a lot of discussion of the words “mortality” and “immoral” in which mortality, according to the National Cancer Institute, refers to the state of being mortal “destined to die”. This meaning could also be used for the death rate, or the number of deaths in a certain group of people who died in a certain period of time. The term “immoral” means morally wrong, or outside society’s standards of acceptable, honest, and moral behavior. This information was found in the Cambridge Dictionary. There’s many reasons why I say dropping the atomic bomb was a morally wrong decision. My first reason is because of the loss of civilian lives. I say this because over 140,000 civilians have lost their lives. 80,000 had lost their lives instantly. The temperature of the bomb at ground level reached 7,000 degrees Fahrenheit in less than a second. It vaporized people …show more content…

But even though the invasion would’ve cost the lives of millions, the atomic bombing of over 100,000 cities had lost nearly 60 percent of their populace and reduced them to rubble. This was on Atomic Salvation: How the A-Bomb Saved the Lives of 32 Million People by Tom Lewis. Also, the atomic bomb caused more lives than the invasion would have and it affected their environment which caused even more lives. Evidence to support this is that there were approximately 80,000 deaths in just the first few minutes. Thousands died later from radiation sickness caused by the bomb. Information from the Truman Library: Decision to Drop the Atomic

Open Document