ipl-logo

Why We Shouldn T Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb In Ww2

587 Words3 Pages

The decision to drop the atomic bomb in World War II remains one of the most controversial and debated events in history. During this event, Japan was in a world conflict. The decision to drop the atomic bomb during World War II raises significant ethical concerns and alternative perspectives that challenge the necessity and morality of devastating acts. There are many reasons why we shouldn't have dropped it. The reason is that the bombings killed 200,000 to 240,000 Japanese. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were the vast majority of civilians who were going throughout their day until the bomb dropped, causing it to kill 70,000 people, leading to people dying from it. About 80,000 people died in Nagasaki. In 1946, the United States confirmed that the strategic bombing was unnecessary. "Based on a detailed investigation of all facts, and supported by the testament of surviving Japanese leaders involved, it is the opinion of the survey that certainly before 31 December 1945, and in all probability before November, japan would have surrendered even if atomic bombs have not been dropped, even if Russia had not entered the warm and even if no invasion had been planned or contemplated." was reported by interviewing hundreds of Japanese civilians and military leaders after Japan surrendered. …show more content…

It led to the Japanese getting perplexed. Even if the Japanese are savages, ruthless, merciless and fantastic, we as the leader of the world for the common welfare cannot drop this terrible bomb on the old capital or the new. that was said by Harry Truman on July 25, 1945. The Americans saw on the path to Pearl Harbor, the Japanese military murders ranging between 100,000 and 200,000 helpless Chinese military prisoners and civilians, and the rape of 10,000 Chinese women in

Show More
Related
674 Words | 3 Pages

Today, Many historians argue that America should not have dropped the bomb on Japan. People believe that is was morally incorrect for Americans to completely destroy two cities in Japan with many civilians. Even though dropping the atomic bombs was a violation of International Law, it was justified because it saved more lives than killed, it was the only way the Japanese would surrender and it made America more powerful. While the dropping of the bomb seems like it killed so many people, it actually saved more lives.

Read More
910 Words | 4 Pages

Dropping a nuke on a country can cause lots of difficulty. The Americans dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was the most controversial topics in American history. Truman was the active president who made the final decision for this act. Many people believe that Truman made the correct decision while others are in complete disagreement with the decision. President Truman made the correct choice in dropping the atomic bomb because it showed the United States had power, it helped end the war quickly, and saved many lives.

Read More
543 Words | 3 Pages

Japan had launched an attack on Pearl Harbor that killed about 2,000 American citizens on December 7, 1941. Additionally, the attack had disabled the U.S. Pacific Fleet, which had a non-combatant status at the time. This proved, that Japan not only posed a great threat to the U.S. but also the rest of the Allies. With the attack being both brutal and unexpected, the only reasonable thing to do was to eliminate the possible threat of more casualties. Some may argue that the dropping of the bomb was both unjustified and inhuman, as it killed many innocent Japanese civilians.

Read More
1672 Words | 7 Pages

Why the atomic bomb shouldn't have been dropped by Dane’e Howell? The atomic bomb that hit Japan was a tragedy that will forever be remembered by both the Japanese and the US. the point I will be making is if the US should have dropped the atomic bomb on japan, what would have happened if they didn't drop the bomb and the after effects of the bomb and how many lives it took. The atomic bomb was dropped on August 6, 1945 during World War II. Truman, the president that dropped the atomic bomb, was originally vice president under President Roosevelt.

Read More
372 Words | 2 Pages

I believe that that dropping the atomic bomb was justifiable and the United States made a good decision dropping it. The United States and Japan had been going at it for almost five years, it had to come to an end. Japan did not only resist, they also unleashed kamikaze attacks at Okinawa; They also ignored the calls for them to surrender Japan should of seen it coming... If you think about it if the atomic bombs weren’t used there would've actually been more lives lost. Dropping the atomic bombs actually saved lives even though a lot of people have a different opinion on the matter.

Read More
892 Words | 4 Pages

Destroying these two cities would eliminate a majority of supplies that Japan needed to finish fighting the war. Using Pearl Harbor and Japan’s insubordination to the rules of war, Truman justified the use of the atomic bomb in a speech to the American people (Doc F). An example of Japan’s inhumane nature was the Bataan Death March in the Philippines. The Japanese forced the filipinos to march over 80 miles in treacherous conditions; if any filipino fell or stopped walking they were shot. This was significant because the Philippines were previously under the United States control and was lost to the

Read More
230 Words | 1 Pages

The Japanese were already on the verge of surrendering, so there was no point on dropping the bomb. Also, President Truman could have just shown an image or chart of the atomic bomb, rather than actually going through with the plan. These examples illustrate how the atomic bomb will always be a big controversy, but America was right for dropping the

Read More
310 Words | 2 Pages

However, the Japanese did not surrender. President Truman had the U.S. military drop an atomic bomb on Hiroshima Japan on August 6, 1945. The bomb killed 70,000 Japanese citizens instantly, but they did not surrender. On August 9, 1945, the U.S. dropped another bomb in Nagasaki, which killed 80,000 people.

Read More
226 Words | 1 Pages

The dropping of the atomic bombs was necessary to bring an end to the war. The Americans had lost an estimated 418,000 troops. The Americans could never have known how many people would be killed between the two bombs. The fact of the matter remains that an estimated 135,000 people were killed in Hiroshima and approximately between 50,000 to 74,000 were killed on the hit at Nagasaki.

Read More
845 Words | 4 Pages

According to secondworldwarhistory.com, “The United States casualty count was 416,800 in military casualties and 1,700 in civilian casualties, while Japan’s casualties counted were 2,120,000 in military and 580,00 in civilian during World War 2”. This statistic means that over the course of the time Japan was in the war from “1937-1945” [USHMM.com] less than 10%, equivalent to about 270,000 people, were killed by the bomb. If it were not for the bomb, the war would have been prolonged killing. If you average the statistics provided above, about 267,000 casualties per year accrued on only the Japanese side.

Read More
497 Words | 2 Pages

Imagine waking up to pure chaos, including some of the deadliest and most destructive weapons ever produced by mankind, and in the blink of an eye the once city you were so familiar with becomes a flattened wasteland scattered with mutilated bodies. The loud bang of the explosion soon turned into an unsettling silence with short, blood-curling, agonizing screams. This is the reality for citizens of two Japanese cities, Hiroshima and Nagasaki. I don’t agree with Harry Truman’s decision to drop the bomb, and I think it was unethical. In my opinion, I don’t think it was necessary because the Japanese were already about to quit.

Read More
748 Words | 3 Pages

On August 14th, 1945 the Japanese Emperor announced their surrender. “By the summer of 1945 the American military was exhausted, and the sheer number of troops needed for Operation Downfall meant that not only would the troops in the Pacific have to male one more landing, but even many of those troops whose valor and sacrifice had brought an end to the Nazi Third Reich were sent to be sent Pacific” (Atomic Bomb, 2023). The American military was weary and the war was getting long and costly. Dropping the bombs was a good solution for the military to get their men and country out of that position. Dropping the two atomic bombs was a military essential for helping shorten the war but also the Japanese were given warning of this

Read More
1133 Words | 5 Pages

America and allied nations wanted to have an opportunity to be a world power in the future of post-war. When this opportunity was presented to the U.S., Truman exploited it and commanded his troops to bomb Japan. The bombings resulted in an unconditional surrender by Japanese forces and subsequent surrender announcement by Emperor Hirohito on the national

Read More
1354 Words | 6 Pages

The Dropping of Atomic Bombs on Japan, is an argument that still gets discussed in the present days. Historians disagree with each other about the dropping of the bombs being a justified action. There are many arguments discussing this topic, making some of them stronger than the others, more justified than the ones that appear weaker. Arguments such as saving lives of both sides, Japanese war crimes and shortening of the war are some of the stronger justified reasons. Though people argue that there are unjustified reasons, such as that there alternatives, that it was inhuman and that it was used to scare the Russians/Soviet Union away were some of the stronger unjustified reasons.

Read More
882 Words | 4 Pages

The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki is one of the most controversial events that came out of world war two. This event of speculation should not be, simply because as a modern day society we can not fairly evaluate the situation as if we were there. Though killing many innocent lives the bomb ultimately stopped the war that would have ended even more lives. The bombs of Hiroshima and Nagasaki should have been dropped because the bombing of these cities caused the political and militaristic changes and because of these changes, the United States benefited greatly. At the end of the war, devastating bombs were dropped on the two unsuspecting cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Read More

More about Why We Shouldn T Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb In Ww2

Open Document