ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of The Civil War

262 Words2 Pages
It is well known that the Civil War is one of the worst manmade disasters to happen on American soil. Many know when it ended, 1865, and it safe to say that almost all Americans know who the victor was. While the Union Army may have won the Civil War, it can be argued that they lost the War of Reconstruction. After the war, racial tensions are at an all-time high as newly freed slaves divide the South into two groups. The first would be the people who want to hold on to how southern society was before the war, they are still loyal to the ideas of the Confederacy. The other group would be the radical Republicans, these people wanted the south to change immodestly and give these newly freed slaves civil rights. Confederate veterans return home
Show More
Related
918 Words | 4 Pages

1. What was the purpose of the Civil War for: The North/Union? Preserve the union, and then later on ending slavery. The South/Confederacy?

Read More
346 Words | 2 Pages

After the Civil War conditions were really bad because a lot of homes and personal properties were destroyed. Because of the War the Union lost 370,000 troop members and the Confederacy lost 260,000. Total 375,000 troop members were injured. Many civilians in the South died because of access to food was infrequent. I believe Reconstruction was necessary because after four long years of war they should move on from it and reunite as one.

Read More
494 Words | 2 Pages

The North and South, from 1861 to 1865, lost over six hundred thousand men in an armed and gruesome conflict over the issue of slavery. Despite the North winning militarily, the death rates for both sides were relatively equal. Following the South’s surrender at Appomattox, a time of Reconstruction ensued. Southern beliefs and behaviors, along with the Grant Administration’s growing indifference about freedman issues, influenced Reconstruction politics across the country. White Southerners scored a resounding victory in the Reconstruction Period by passing restriction laws against Negroes and intensified the Southern atmosphere beyond its original Pre-Civil War environment.

Read More
306 Words | 2 Pages

At the Civil War’s end current president Abraham Lincoln addressed the broken nation as a beacon of hope and reconciliation. However, after his assassination Andrew Johnson became president; Where Lincoln wanted for a peaceful and brotherly reconciliation Johnson though the south unworthy of the mercy the deceased president had extended to them. In many ways the reconstruction seemed like a total and utter fail- however some splendid outcomes did emerge from this event. “Republicans hoped to reconstruct the south by enabling African Americans to own land and become full citizens” instead this plan failed when Johnson allowed white southerners to keep the land and implemented ‘Share Cropping’ (Borstelmann et al.

Read More
1041 Words | 5 Pages

INTRO: Reconstruction; the most conflicting era in the United States history. Coming directly after the Civil War from 1865 thorough 1877, Reconstruction played a major part in the Land of the Free’s backstory. Throughout Reconstruction many things occurred within the North and South due to chaos within the government system, neighborhoods, and social classes. The creator of Reconstruction and the 16th president, Abraham Lincoln created the idea of Reconstruction in the South while the Civil War was going on.

Read More
656 Words | 3 Pages

During this time period there was many writers writing both for and against the South. A major person in history, Thomas Jefferson, would write against the North and for the South. That is only one of many example from back then, but at this time some of the greatest critics of the South were from the South. Some people believe the South has such a long memory on the civil war because they lost, and even though some people in the current South want many of their peers to just forget about that time in history, many will not give it up.

Read More
825 Words | 4 Pages

The Radicals therefore attempted to reshape the South by enfranchising blacks, putting Unionist and pro-Republican governments in southern legislatures, and punishing southern planter elites, whom many politicians held responsible for the Civil War. As “carpetbaggers” (northerners who moved to the South after the war) and “scalawags” (white Unionists and Republicans in the South) streamed into the South, southerners denounced them as traitors and falsely accused many of corruption. However, through organizations like the congressionally approved Freedmen’s Bureau, the U.S. government did manage to distribute confiscated lands to former slaves and poor whites as well as help improve education and sanitation and foster industrial growth in rebuilt southern

Read More
435 Words | 2 Pages

Have you ever thought to yourself, “Hey, could the Civil War have been avoided? And what could they have done to get rid of slavery sooner?” Well, all of your burning questions about whether or not the notorious Civil War could have been avoided are about to be answered. The Civil War is well-known for the many people who died fighting in it.

Read More
586 Words | 3 Pages

As we know, the concluding factor of the war, left the north in victory. This created a massive amount of changes to be made in American society. Although slavery was abolished during this time, other challenges arose during the reconstruction era in the south. I strongly argue that, through the result of the

Read More
921 Words | 4 Pages

Since it could not have been determined that some of the Confederate soldiers had any desire to actually fight against the Union to begin with, the Radical Republican representatives of the North reacted unjustly in determining how to manage them. Had the soldiers not been treated as unconstitutional followers of a rebellion, there would have been less conflict and tension in resolving the reincorporation of the southern states. The same is true for the Confederate military and political leaders, because although they were intentionally fighting to win over the North, their treatment was not fair. Although the North was victorious over the South and the Radical Republicans had ideas for the punishment of Confederates and refusal to re-incorporate the states, but instead keep them as territories (US History I), it would have been more effective to focus on the original Northern goal of equality. A more peaceful transition into one entire nation again could have occurred, if the

Read More
2593 Words | 11 Pages

Perhaps the greatest war in American History, the Civil War, fought over one hundred and fifty years ago, is considered to be the bloodiest battle and most unique because of the number of casualties and the fact that it was the only war fought on American soil. The legacy that the Civil War left behind for future generations was one of hope, equality and understanding. However, the rebuilding of the South and the new laws that were to be enacted to stop any other wars breaking out that would divide the Union were an endeavor that would shape the future of the South, North and the rest of the United States for many years. The freeing of the slaves in the South has led to many other equality reforms throughout the years which have made all men

Read More
879 Words | 4 Pages

The support of the wealthy southerner was increased on these politics and were steadfast in refusal to bend from the southern way of life. To fully comprehend the significance of the Civil War, the most important event in the history of the United States, it is necessary to understand its outcome. Such an understanding will allow one to more fully appreciate the monumental changes that the war brought about: the remaking of the Southern social and economic structure, the strengthening of the Federal government, and the elimination of the major sectional distinctions in this country. Internal conflict was provoked by

Read More
185 Words | 1 Pages

The reason is not that civilized countries are so averse to hurting people that they prefer “purely military” wars. (Nor were all of the participants in these wars entirely civilized.) The reason is apparently that the technology and geography of war- fare, at least for a war between anything like equal powers dur- ing the century ending in World War II, kept coercive violence from being decisive before military victory was achieved. Blockade indeed was aimed at the whole enemy nation, not concentrated on its military forces; the German civilians who died of influenza in the First W orld W ar were victims of violence directed at the whole country.

Read More
1141 Words | 5 Pages

The year was 1865, and the United States Civil War had just come to a close. Now, to many people, this was just a historical event or a conflict between the North and South. But in reality, it is much more than that. The effects of the Civil War were not only monumental back then, but they also still impact and shape our country today. Everything from our politics to our national identity and many things in between were all at least somewhat influenced by the war.

Read More
578 Words | 3 Pages

The Civil War was the most ruthless and devastating war in American history. After being pushed too far by the Northerner’s anti-slavery antics, the South decided to attempt to peacefully succeed from the Union. However, the North almost automatic disagreed with this attempt, and what was supposed to be a peacefully situation turned out to be the war with the most casualties that has ever been known to happen, the exact number being over 600,000 lives lost. But despite this catastrophic event, the true horror began to reveal itself after the war, with the name of Reconstruction. A few years after the war, life seemed to be headed in the right direction for the former slaves.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of The Civil War

Open Document