Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The crusades research question
What brought about the crusades initially
The crusades research question
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“Justifiable wars undoubtedly include wars of necessity, that is, wars in which the most vital interests of a country are threatened and where there are no promising
Introduction: Provide background information on the Crusades, restate the DBQ question, state thesis with reasons. (include academic vocabulary and underline) The results of the Crusades was probably more negative than positive. In “Doc 4”, It states that “Moreover, the assault of one Christian people on another, when one of the goals of the Fourth Crusade was reunion of Greek and Latin churches, made the split between the Greek and Latin churches permanent.” The Crusades had a lot of hatred to the religions, and by 1204 the Crusaders had lost some of their appeal because the knights agreed to attack the Byzantine Capital instead.
The Crusades affected the lives of the followers Christian, Jewish, and Muslim faiths. However, the Jews were impacted the most during this time in the Crusades with only negative outcomes. Almost all of the people following the Jewish faith were tortured by Christians because of what the forefathers had done in which they were getting back at the Jews for killing Jesus for no reason. The Jewish chronicler in 1096 stated, “Let us first avenge ourselves on them and exterminate them from among our nations so that the name of Israel will no longer be remembered, or let them adopt our faith,” (Document D). The Christians forced the Jews to either leave, die, or adopt the Christian faith.
When talking about war, there are many books with few answers to what war truly is. Barbara Ehrenreich brings forth not only the possibilities towards understanding war but also the passion people from history have had towards it. One key issue she brings to light is humanities love for war, so much so that people would use excuses like holy wars to justify their need to fight in a war. She declares that war is as muddled as the issue of diseases and where diseases came from around 200 years ago. More so than that she even goes further on to state that these rituals that date back to prehistoric times are the cause of human nature during times of war rather than human instinct.
i think war--violence, of all kinds, really--is always a tragedy; but i also very firmly believe that it can bring about very important and necessary (and even sometimes good)
The Crusades were expeditions done by the Roman Catholic Church in alliance with Middle-Age Kingdoms and Empires. There were a total of nine Crusades during the period of 1095 to 1291, led by Saladin, Richard I "the Lionheart" of England, Pope Urban II, Frederick I the Holy Roman Emperor, etc. At first, the Crusades were a way to fight back the Muslims for their conquest of Jerusalem. The idea of the Crusade was a very good marketing strategy by Pope Urban II. It was told that any Crusader would be rewarded a place in heaven, and forgiven their sins.
A just war can can only begin to be considered soif the war itself was a last resort, waged by an actual authority, and was against a tangible wrongdoing.
War has long stood as a source of settlement between differing nations. Sometimes war is glorified, sometimes it is denounced. Regardless of what stance is taken on war, there is no denying that warfare changes the way people think and act. When war arises, the mindset of a nation completely changes. War has so much influence that society can change through the course of those wars.
The Crusades were successful failures because they did not meet many of their goals, but left lasting effects. The Crusades was an attempt by the Roman Catholic Church to regain the Holy Lands from the Muslims. They believed they were fighting for god and all sins would be forgiven and defend the Byzantine Empire from the Turks. The first Crusade (1096 -1099) was successful for the Christians because they had a clear and organized religious based purpose. Crusaders the Christian armies were able to hold Jerusalem and in the process led to a massacre of Jews.
“If we judge it by the standards of previous wars, it is merely an imposture like the battle between certain ruminant animals whose horns are set at an angle that they are incapable of hurting one another”. Even though neither side would win they had to act like they were going to fight and win. An example in American society is the war on terror. This war has been going on since 9/11 in Afghanistan, Iraq and surrounding countries.
War is something no person would ever be able to understand unless they’ve lived it. I will never know the true reality, the most I can imagine is what I am shown and told. To me it is truly a strange concept, people killing each other to achieve goals that will make our world a better place. Why is it that for our world to be better, we have to weaken other people? Why is it that people destroy the lives of others, to make life easier for others?
Also, there is enough violence and death in war whether it’s small or big, there’s no need to bring more to the table.
Beginning in Genesis 14 when Abraham’s nephew was kidnapped by the King of Elam, Abraham gathered 318 trained men to defeat the Elamites. Even this far back in the Old Testament we are shown that the military engages in rescuing and protecting those that can’t protect themselves. This is just one example of a just war within the Bible. The Bible has numerous references to war; Exodus has the word “war” five times, Numbers, twenty-one, Deuteronomy, ten, Joshua, seventeen times, Judges, ten, 1 Samuel, eight and 2 Samuel, nine times. Even the book of Psalms, which was written by David a man of war, has it mentioned eight times.
“Is war ever justified?”, is a question with its solution first originating from Christian theology. Saint Augustine was the first individual to offer a theory on this, and introduced the “Just War Theory”, which was later revised by Saint Thomas Aquinas, creating just 3 criteria to be met in order for a war to be just: “War needed to be waged by legitimate authority, have a just cause, and have the right intentions”. Since then, the “Just War Theory” was been used by many to justify their wars, however, there many other factors that were not taken into consideration that could be used to justify a war. I feel that war is justified and will be looking into points that are for the justification of war. War is justified when there is a “just cause”, and when it is used as a “last resort”.
War is supposed to have a victor, right? The clock is ticking, right? Wrong. Our conventional paths of thinking are liable to lead us astray at times. Perhaps they fail to consider nuance?