This act increased the federal powers imposed on the citizens in order to help their efforts towards investigating terrorists. These powers included telephone taps, internet taps, voice mail, grand jury information, immigration, money laundering, and crime. While these powers made it easier for the government to track down possible suspects of terrorism, it interfered with the people’s right to privacy. All the provisions under the Patriot Act can be used on the citizens with the approval of a court order. Furthermore, it interfered with the Fourth Amendment.
NSA SPYING PROGRAMMES The United States of America has been ranked the best country with a strong security and defense capability and currently still holds the position. Over the years from independence, the U.S.A continue to increase in strengthen and power to self-defend and ability to intercept major issues around the world. From the World War II and other subsequence wars that followed, the whole world can testify to the superiority of the American Military and their efficiency in the field. This doesn’t just stop there; USA spends almost 20% of their budget on the defense and security of the nation.
Due to the enactment of the The Patriot Act back in 2001 after the 9/11 attacks, the United States has felt its effect on their right to privacy. Many believe that the US has taken advantage of the act to spy on innocent Americans rather than actually gathering information on terrorists. Certain methods are used such as eavesdropping on phone calls, The Prism Program which contains vital information of americans across the internet. A bulk database of phone numbers etc, The Patriot Act does have its positive aspects in certain areas except privacy. However, it also comes with its cons as well.
This is a clear example that shows that even the most controversial parts of the Patriot Act are not just constitutional, but strongly supported by the Constitution. From this, many see that any attempted claims that the Patriot Act is wrong in the law are based merely on thought. But, there are more than one sections of the Patriot Act that are up for debate. Any arguments against the Patriot Act are destroyed quickly due to the fact that, “no single provision of the Patriot Act has ever been found unconstitutional,” (McNeil). Once again, it is clear that the Patriot Act is constitutional.
The Patriot act when passed it was overlooked, rushed and it did hinder our rights and privacy, however at that time who was thinking about their right and privacy when such an act had just happened. I was in high school when the Patriot Act went into law and all I cared was to make sure that the people that planned the attack get what they deserved for killing so many Americans. Maybe, they waited for the time that the American people were vulnerable to pass the Patriot Act, because they knew it wasn’t going to get everyone’s attention. Now, that a lot of people know how the Patriot Act works and how it has been used, we the American people want it gone or to have a better supervision so that individuals with malicious intent wont misuse it
In 2001, following the most successful terrorist attack on U.S. soil in the history of the nation, the Bush Administration and Congress granted the National Security Agency (NSA) broad powers to collect both foreign and domestic intelligence to avoid a similar strike in the future. Ever since, the NSA has conducted covert measures to collect signal intelligence on a global scale. The extension of powers granted to the NSA has been met with significant controversy on both its legality and constitutionality. It is apparent that the NSA surveillance program is constitutional for citizens of the United States, because all stored data is encrypted upon collection, and warrants are needed to decrypt the stored data for review. However, the United
why the NSA is bad some people believe that everything on the internet should be monitored by the NSA, well i believe that is completely wrong and unjust. for a couple reasons. But the main one is that it goes against the fourth amendment in the constitution. The fourth amendment prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and requires any warrant to be judicially sanctioned and supported by a probable cause, which means that the NSA can 't search your messages,calls,search history, or data unless they have a reason that is lawful and approved by a judge. But in most cases they don 't have it approved.
The Patriot Act, sounds like the title of a really corny comic book. However it is actually an act enforced by the U.S. government that allows certain things be done, like people's phone calls to be recorded in or social media kept under watch, order to protect citizens from possible terrorists. This is a controversial topic due to people believing their rights are being taken away. I think that claim is totally proposterous seeing as how it protects said people from future terrorist attacks. With that idea, how can you argue against the point and uses of the Patriot Act?
The Patriot Act allows investigators to use the tools that were already available to investigate organized crime and drug trafficking. George W. Bush decided to create and push the Patriot Act as a way of protection for the people just 45 days after the attack on the World Trade Center on 9/11. Bush placed this act in hopes that he would be able to prevent any types of terrorist or unsafe act from happening again. Today, people are quick to disagree with this idea due to the idea that they are being watched constantly. Although it is understandable, knowing that privacy is not considered when it comes to our personal lives, the government is just monitoring us to keep us protected.
Before you text that secret message that you think is only between you and the person you’re messaging. Is what you are saying really secret? The National Security Agency (NSA) is a government agency that monitors and watches phone calls, emails, and even faxes. This is continuously happening, is it a necessary agency for the protection of the people of the United States? No, in most aspects it is an agency that is just eavesdropping on U.S. citizens and don’t do anything.
The article "Patriot Act Protects Americans from Terrorism" explains the benefits of the act. One key area is it has removed obstacles to investigating terrorism and it has strengthened the criminal laws against terrorism. This is very important because if the governement didn't make these restrictions, there would be numerous terrorism attacks on the country. In the article "Fight the Patriot Act", it explains that the act violates the privacy of Americans because of the FBI and NSA collecting phone records of millions of people through the Patriot Act. The article is wrong because the cooperations are not violating privacy, they are simply working to prevent possible threats to Americans.
Can something also be deemed unconstitutional, even if it is protecting our national security? It does not seem
On the other hand, opponents of the Patriot Act claim it violates our rights to privacy. Likewise, arguments over the patriot act are multifaceted and complex and both sides have valid points. Contenders of this act are justified in that they fear “big brother”, they fear this is a slippery slope which could move us closer to other countries where the government exerts total power over its citizens. What the opponents do not take into account is that we have more to fear from these countries that wish to kill us than we do from our own government and sometimes change is necessary to keep the threat of other countries at minimum.
Proof that NSA Spying is Wrong and How to Stop It Right now, all over the US people are going about their daily lives unaware that someone could be watching their every move, and listening in on every private conversation. The next few paragraphs will attempt to prove that NSA spying is not only wrong but is also illegal. People who have worked for the NSA such as William Binney, Edward Snowden, and many others have come forward and exposed the secrets of NSA spying on American citizens (Poitras, Laura). Through the Quantum Program, the NSA is currently able to use major internet companies to track where a person goes and who they talk to (Chapman, Steve).
In 2008, President Bush signed into law The FISA Amendment Act, an act which allowed the government to monitor Americans’ electronic devices. Bush claimed that this Act could help save lives, as mentioned before, but what he did not mention is that this allows the government to conduct surveillance without probable cause. (“How the NSA’s Surveillance Procedures Threaten Americans’ Privacy.”) When people heard about this, they became concerned, and many began to question if the NSA would abuse this power.
