The Role Of Friar Lawrence Responsible For The Tragic Death Of Romeo And Juliet

487 Words2 Pages

The man who is truly responsible for the tragic death of Romeo and Juliet is Tybalt due to his hatred of peace and his blind hatred. Of course, it is true that Friar Lawrence could be held responsible for their deaths because it is his convoluted plan that goes awry eventually ending in the double suicide of Romeo and Juliet. Juliet comes to the Friar looking for help after the Prince banishes Romeo. The Friar tells her “Go home; be merry; give consent to marry Paris…take thou this vial…and this distilling liquor drink thou off; When presently through all thy veins shall run a cold and drowsy humor; for no pulse…No warmth, no breath shall testify that thou livest” (4. 1. 95-100). Friar Lawerence tried to conceal his involvement with an elaborate plan that may have done more harm than good for Romeo and Juliet. …show more content…

Tybalt was involved in the first conflict that the reader encounters and continues to be problematic throughout the tragedy. He displays a tendency towards violence as soon as the reader becomes introduced to him as he says “What, drawn and talk of peace? I hate the word as I hate hell, all Montagues, and thee.” (1.1. 71-72) Equally important is the argument between Capulet and Tybalt concerning Romeo’s attendance at the party. This spat between the two ending with Tybalt saying “patience perforce with willful choler meeting makes my flesh tremble in their different greeting. I will withdraw, but this intrusion shall Now seeming sweet convert to bitt’rst gall” (1.5.100-104). This scene seems to be the root of the conflict that will eventually arise into a violent engagement. This coupled with fate will set the ripple effect that leads to the tragic death of both Romeo and Juliet in motion. Furthermore, the death of Tybalt is the last push that he gives to seal Romeo’s and Juliet’s