ipl-logo

Theory Number One Ethical Theory Analysis

1074 Words5 Pages

As a doctor at St. Als I received five patients in one day. All patients were in a car accident and all patients that came to the hospital under my care were vital members of our community. All needing organs replaced. While at the same time I had another patient come into the hospital who was a homeless man, who had no identification, no family. In that moment there was a thought, what if that patient could save the lives of the five I needed to save? What if I could risk one life to save five?
Using the four major theories I began to analyze my decision, I will examine each theory and compare and contract each theory to help guide my decision on what is morally correct. Whether I will put my own interest in front of my patients or whether …show more content…

The theory brakes down that I could do what is in the best interest of myself. I could do the surgery and make sure that one patient saves five. As a doctor it would be a very heroic measure. I would be talked about and people could even write articles and I would be comes well known in the community and in the medical field. Regardless of the homeless man and his "unknown" situation he could make a great sacrifice for me and my patients.
Theory number two act utilitarianism gave me the most interest to the situation at hand. Here we have a theory that states, a person's act is right only if that act produces the best possible results. Well yes, this is the one I am looking at. I am looking at this homeless man like he can serve a purpose for five people and that will service then morally this is correct, because the outcome would serve the act. Saving five people who will benefit from this outcome by not only getting to live, but get back to serving the community. How can this be a wrong thing? I would be giving back.
Theory number three comes from the natural law theory no this one will be a hard one to digest for it is derived from the natural good of humans. The idea that …show more content…

How do we as humans decide what we do is morally right or wrong. If by letting the homeless man die am I as a doctor ignoring my oath to the medical world and letting someone die to serve the purpose of others? Or do I see it as someone is saving five others? But what about the homeless man, what makes his life less valuable to me or anyone else because he is not an upstanding member or our community, he is after all human. As a doctor it would be easy to say that the homeless man died from whatever ailed him and I could go on as if this was the natural order of things. But could I then wake up the next day and really look at myself as someone who did what was good.
The fourth theory is Kant’s deontological theory, he states that an act can be morally bad, but it can lead to a good outcome. This is the one that has grabbed my attention the most. If I sacrifice one for the good of the others is it bad because in the end five lives will be saved. On the other hand, does that mean that someone else's life is less valuable because they have something everyone else wants.
After going through all the theory's and the thought process behind each theory I think that I can now start to see where they are similar and where they are

Show More
Related
568 Words | 3 Pages

Saving the patient is my job, my duty, and like any other person's job, I have a professional status to accomplish.

Read More
833 Words | 4 Pages

This theory believes that it is our moral responsibility to help those in need. For example, Peter Singer states this principle “requires us only to prevent what is bad, and not to promote what is good, and it requires this of us only when we can do it without sacrificing anything that is, from the moral point of view, comparably important”

Read More
896 Words | 4 Pages

There are many different forms of ethical theories that exist today and can be used to explain the reasoning behind human actions. For example, an individual has their own motives and intentions so that might cause them to act out differently than somebody else. Regardless of your intent, all behavior has consequences. The Utilitarianism point of view is a commonly used form that an action is morally correct if the outcome of that action is most favorable to the majority of people. 1.

Read More
156 Words | 1 Pages

Conclusion I have argued that even though a physician killing an untreatable patient and a physician letting a patient die upon their request are both morally justifiable, the distinction between the two regarding the morality of physician assisted suicide is important because they are both justified differently. I have presented two counter arguments based on consequentialism, and argued that both of them untrue. A physician killing an untreatable patient upon their request and letting an untreatable patient die upon their request are both justifiable aspects of physician assisted suicide, and therefore it is not an important distinction to make regarding the moral permissibility of physician assisted suicide. However, it is an important

Read More
1543 Words | 7 Pages

This theory is used in health and social care to make choices based on your own morals and what you feel is the correct way in which to behave towards service users and colleagues. The base of this theory is from the work of Aristotle and Plato. For example, Simon has assured Patrick Green that his health status will not affect his status at the centre, which shows he thinks Patrick should still be treated the same as before. This would benefit Patrick as he will not have to worry about what will happen when he returns to the martial arts class, as he already has a lot of other changes happening which he has to adjust

Read More
1726 Words | 7 Pages

Ethical differences can occur because of individual perseption of a subject or event (Legal dictionary, 2017). The ethical difference even may be political or religious in nature (Legal dictionary, 2017). Legal reasoning helps people to distinguish between what is right within society compared to what they think they should do. In this case, the moral reasoning is to end the patients suffering and to allow the resident to die is the kinder option (Moore, 2017). The legal reasoning in this case would be to honor the families wishes with the exception that the decision for life saving treatments was made in a malicious manner (Moore,

Read More
1532 Words | 7 Pages

Medical personnel are given a very difficult job, to save people lives. In this difficult

Read More
762 Words | 4 Pages

This theory is based on natural laws, common sense, intuition, and duties. This theory considers the greatest good for the greatest number. It judges morality of action based on adherence to rules. It informs you to follow the rules, because the rules bind you to your duty. In an ethical dilemma, this theory is used to emphasize motive.

Read More
1457 Words | 6 Pages

According to this theory, the people focus on making logical choice regarding the circumstances in which to commit crime. It is noticed that this theory makes use of utilitarian belief under which man is the actor who considers costs, means,

Read More
616 Words | 3 Pages

In my opinion, the most ethical response is to save patient six, and let the five patients die. The reason why is because it's my job to save patients lives that I can. Additionally, there is a possibility of me going jail if I kill patient six because it is illegal.

Read More
1252 Words | 6 Pages

Assisted suicide is a rather controversial issue in contemporary society. When a terminally ill patient formally requests to be euthanized by a board certified physician, an ethical dilemma arises. Can someone ethically end the life of another human being, even if the patient will die in less than six months? Unlike traditional suicide, euthanasia included multiple individuals including the patient, doctor, and witnesses, where each party involved has a set of legal responsibilities. In order to understand this quandary and eventually reach a conclusion, each party involved must have their responsibilities analyzed and the underlying guidelines of moral ethics must be investigated.

Read More
2262 Words | 10 Pages

To deal with these dilemmas, utilitarianism and duty ethics theories should be taken into account. For a utilitarian decision maker, who will attempt to maximize the sum of utility for all concerned (Kvalnes, 2015), the third person should pull the switch or push the fat man to reduce the killings from five persons to one person; that is, keeping the number of people died to a minimum. In contrast, in duty ethics perspectives, there are moral considerations more important than

Read More
385 Words | 2 Pages

As you know children who do something wrong are often punished with ISS (in school suspension.) But is that the best thing to do when a child gets hit in the mouth and they swing back because their parents would be furious if they just let someone beat them up? Is punishing a kid with ISS beneficial? Often times not only is it boring, but it worsens academic and behavioral problems.

Read More
859 Words | 4 Pages

Life or Death Who chooses death over life? Sometimes we have to make this decision over a loved one when there is no hope for their recovery. It would be incredibly hard to make this life or death decision on another human being and twice as hard when it is someone we love. The author discusses the argument of this controversial topic of sustaining life at any cost or dying peacefully as an ethical issue. An ethicist, a person who specializes in or writes on ethics, can provide valuable discernment with respect to right and wrong motives or actions.

Read More
1134 Words | 5 Pages

Over 120,000 people are on the waiting list for kidney donations. Despite medical professionals urging people to sign up to be an organ donor both in life and when they die, the number of donations is still extremely short of what it would take to make an impact on this crisis. Around four-thousand, five-hundred people die each year due to the lack of donated kidneys. What if we could change this? What if there was a better way to encourage people to donate kidneys?

Read More

More about Theory Number One Ethical Theory Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document