Argued on February 11, the Marbury v. Madison case was influential to the judicial and the court had made the right decision by not allowing Marbury his appointment. There are many reasons why the he did not deserve his appointment. One of the reasons was because the Midnight Appointment was a medium by John Adams to frustrate his successor. Another reason is because Marbury did not deserve his appointment was because he did not receive his commision. Finally, he did not deserve his appointment because the writs of mandamus.
The Marbury v. Madison case was a revolutionary case which the concept of judicial review was introduced. At the end of John Adams presidency, Adams started appointing justices to courts . This became known as the Midnight Appointments. One of these Midnight Appointments was William Marbury. His commision was signed and sealed before John Adams was out of office. However, his commision was not delivered before John Adams was out of office. Thomas Jefferson, the next president, and his secretary of state, James Madison, refused to deliver his commission. This is the entire basis of the Marbury v. Madison case.
…show more content…
“Before Jefferson took office on March 4, 1801, Adams and Congress passed the Judiciary Act 1801, which created new courts, added judges, and gave the president more control over appointment of judges. The Act was essentially an attempt by Adams and his party to frustrate his successor, as he used the act to appoint 16 new circuit judges and 42 new justices of the peace.”