Three Sociological Perspectives

856 Words4 Pages

Sociology has three major sociological perspectives. Perspective is just the way of looking at the world. A theory is an arrangement of interrelated recommendations or standards intended to answer an inquiry or clarify a specific wonder. . (Ritzer and Stepnisky, n.d.) It gives us a point of view. According to functionalism society is basically a system of different parts that interconnect together in harmony to have a state of balance and social equilibrium for the whole. It is not about the individual. Instead it is about the greater good of society. The greater good is a functioning society. . (Ritzer and Stepnisky, n.d.) There is no room for the individual because focusing on the individuals causes chaos. The point of society is to …show more content…

Functionalism has two senses which is the strong and weak sense. The weak sense is the approach that tries to relate the parts of society to the whole and relate one part to another. (Ritzer and Stepnisky, n.d.) This basically society is an arrangement of interconnected parts that cooperate in amicability to keep up a condition of adjust and social balance for the entirety. (Ritzer and Stepnisky, n.d.) The strong sense can be defined as an approach that is based on seeing society as analogous to biological organism and attempts to explain social structures in the terms of the needs of society as whole. This basically means the social structure of society needs to focus on society as a whole. (Ritzer and Stepnisky, n.d.) If society does not function as a whole it will chaos. Being able to function in a society promotes functionalism and conformity. To have a functioning society you must conform to their standards and behaviors. (Ritzer and Stepnisky, …show more content…

( Dillion, 156) . He he proposed that society is an activity framework with four subsystems that are the center institutional structure of every single present day society, and are fundamental in the support of social request Due to his attention on these four subsystems and their practical centrality to framework harmony, Parsons is thought to be a supporter of functionalism, as well as an auxiliary functionalist. (Thomas,