Within today’s world, we see a lot more blatant comments directed at others more than very before. I a way, that is why this is like in the perspective of “the monster.” He is repeatedly singled-out for no starting reason at all besides his physical and mental appearance. The people within the novel are reacted to soon to him before really giving him a chance. Overall, we can see that Frankenstein was never really given any chance of activity with other life with both Victor, his creator, and the people within his own society. Victor Frankenstein was a scientist who had one goal, and that was to create a living creature that would leave a positive effect on the human society. For a period of time, he went through a countless number of experiments and studied a countless number of samples, until he finally created the so-called monster! Although, his view on “the monster” had absolutely diminished when first seeing his rather large and ogre-like appearance. “I beheld the wretch—the miserable monster whom I had created (56).” Also, Victor never even tried to show this “monster” down the right path, where the only action ever made was shutting him out. “The monster” at he is very irresponsible for abandoning something he created …show more content…
In fact, they were just as mean and rejecting as Victor was. It must be a horrible feeling to know that you’re not accepted in the society despite the fact of you having no responsibility of your appearance. In my opinion, I believe that the blame should be on Victor because he is the creator/scientist of “the monster.” Not only did he create this dilemma but is also threatening the destruction of mankind’s existence. For example, in the story “the monster” states “If you consent, neither you nor any other human being shall ever see us again: I will go to South America (127).” The monster is even willing to leave just on order for him to feel less