Revolutionists explanation of October Revolution is based on the importance of the force of the masses which created the revolutionary nature of the society leading to cardinal reforms. Lenin was indeed a key figure and the Bolshevik party was able to meet the demand of the masses which raised their popularity. This view shows a direct conflict between a revolutionist and liberal ‘totalitarian’ schools that implements Lenin and Stalin as the only people that caused terror and emplaced control over
Based on how history people starving and Czar Nicholas 2 doing whatever he wanted was the main cause of the Russian Revolution. During this time people were being rationed for food because of the costly war effort. Along with the people going hungry Czar Nicholas 2 was constantly dissolving the Duma to get what he wanted. People started to lose faith in him due to government corruption and the way he was letting his people starve. People began to riot and the soldiers that were sent to end their rebellion defected to their cause and helped them to get rid of Czar Nicholas 2.
Amid the constructive period in Ivan’s clout, he popularized self-government, reformed tax collection, and instituted statutory law and church reform. The tsar had quite prompt and constructive ideas to better the country. The schemes that he suggested were carried out, but a number of them failed. They crumbled due to Ivan the Terrible’s temper.
Millions of people in Russia during World War 1 were starving or killed. To make matters even worse, the Russian government was falling apart. Riots started to break out in Russia to end the war. Finally in 1918 the war ended which brought remorse to the people of Russia, however it did not last long. Right after World War 1 the October Revolution took place in Russia to allow the “Bolsheviks-the communists-to power over all other possible parties”(28).
In the early nineteen hundreds, Russia was ruled by Czar Nicholas II. He was the last in line of a long line of monarchs called Romanovs. By 1915 , most of the Russian people had lost complete faith in the Czar. Many factors include the corruption of the Russian government, approximately 3 quarters of Russia was poverty stricken, substandard working conditions and wages, and the dreadful involvement in World War I. Russia’s political problems during the Russian Revolution caused a major shift in people’s lives government, and religion. In 1917, there were two revolutions that took place in March and October.
Since there was such a large peasant population it was easy for them to rebel and win. Many troops were just simply peasants in uniform and when the tsar order the soldiers to shoot the people rebelling they didn’t and the tsar had no power.(doc.2).These peasant were known as proletariats, the growing class of factory and railroad workers, miners, and urban wage earners.(doc.4).Lenin, the leader of the Bolshevik party spread the works of Karl Marx to many factory workers with other socialist.(doc.4).Lenin was profoundly affected by his older brother Alexander’s 1887 execution for being involved in a plot to assassinate the tsar.(doc.5).The peasants tried to make a petition to overthrow the tsar’s reign but he refused to meet with them.(doc.1)This gave the peasants almost no choice but to revolt. Finally, in March the tsar is overthrown and within about a day there were no signs of the tsar because the peasants had burned or taken down everything that even made you think of him. Little did the Russians know that it was more difficult to construct a government than to destroy
In the early 1900’s the Russian people had become angry at the way the Russian monarchy (Tsar Nicholas II) had handled foreign affairs and how he was treating his people unfairly. They had many protests, one in 1905 and two in 1917. The revolution in 1905 overthrow the absolute monarchy and put in a provisional government. No one really listened to the provisional government, so they overthrew it again in 1917. These revolutions and acts of disobedience led to many unnecessary deaths of innocent people.
States. The Russians gave him and his commitment to socialism credit with the Heroes’ Grave at the Red Square. Reed’s detailed description of the October Revolution and immediate observation imply that the book is a collection of his own experiences, involvements and understandings. His observations took place during the peak of the revolution and illustrate Bolshevik’s determination to destabilize the ruling class. The Bolsheviks changed the Russian society introducing and enforcing policies in favor of the working class.
Russia’s extremely rich history of the 9th to 13th centuries has led us to recognize prominent leaders of Kievan Rus like Oleg of Novgorod, or Vladimir the Great. But of the many leaders that have ruled over Russian provinces, few are as distinct, complex, and memorable as Ivan the Terrible following the rise of Muscovite Russia. Ivan IV was captivating not only in his conflicting reign, but in his tumultuous personal feelings of paranoia and ruthlessness. For years, Ivan IV has been debated as being identified as either a tyrant or a reformer. It is this extremely fine line between these two identifications that classify Ivan IV as distinctly both a cruel tyrant and an advanced reformer.
Both the French Revolution of 1789 and the Russian Revolution of 1971 remain two of the most significant events in history. Despite taking place over three thousand miles away from each other and occurring nearly a century apart, they share many striking similarities. These parallels include, but are not limited to the role played by the peasantry classes, the nature of the violence and bloodshed, and how the shift in both the countries' powers affected the world. To begin, in both the French and Russian revolutions, the social classes were very reminiscent of each other, specifically the peasantry classes.
“ What challenges and/or difficulties did the tsarist government of russia face and why did the russian citizens want to end the Tsar's Autocratic government?” Is the question I will be discussing within this Argumentative Essay about the Russian revolution of the year 1917. The Russian revolution was ongoing during the end of World War I and was the cause of one of the first countries that replaced its monarch state and began a Communist state. During the Russian revolution a rebellion under the name of Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin started to remove the Tsar Nicholas II out of power and to put an end to the tsar government.
On Saturday, Sukhanov called a meeting with some of his buddies to talk politics but none of that really matters because “as is always the case, the organized Socialist centers were not controlling the popular movement or leading it to any definite political goal”. (page 11) At this time ideas of a Constituent Assembly are not known to masses but merely the socialist parties. At this time rioters rallied around calls for peace, rather than self governance, as that was their processing problem. Sukhanov feels that it was “temporarily necessary to shelve the slogans against the war” in order to bring about a government that would serve the people (page 12).
As the strikes increased, tsar Nicholas II had responded to the plead of the working class with the October Manifesto. In the book, “Major Problems in the History of Imperial Russia”, by James Cracraft, contains a document titled, “The October Manifesto of Nicholas II, 1905”. This document was Nicholas II response to the Russian Revolution of 1905, as it addressed the basic civil rights to the people and the creation of an elected parliament which was known as the State Duma. In the beginning of the document, Nicholas states that the riots are causing the nation despair and to obliged with theses riots and disturbances, he will unite the government. “We believe it necessary to unify the operations of the higher government.
The Russian Revolution, which was started by Lenin and his followers, was a rebellion that occurred in 1917 which forced higher powers to act to the needs of the lower class. For instance, many citizens were worried for their protection in consequence to the lack of survival necessities due to an early drought. Furthermore, their current czar during the time was incapable for his position as a czar and made horrendous decisions as czar. For example, when the czar, Nicholas, entered in World War I, he sent untrained troops into countless battles of failure which costed in mass amounts of lost life (paragraph 23).
The sovereign state in Russia developed under the influence of Ivan the Great (III) and Ivan the Terrible (IV), who are known as the two key figures in the process of centralization. When Ivan III began/started his reign Moscow had become the political and religious centre of Russia (Dukes, 1998, p.42). One of the major contributions in the centralization process were made by Ivan the Great since he took part in the ingathering process of Russian lands and thus, expanded and centralize the Muscovite state and consequently ended the period of Appanage Rus (Ziegler, 1999). He conquered new territories and distributed these to loyal army officers which in return had to support him in military campaigns; accordingly with this. In 1480 Ivan ended foreign conquests of Russia by raising the military apparatus and defeating the Mongols.
