Medical science is rapidly developing with various new treatments and technology every day. In this development phase, there are many issues in which medical science still has not achieved much success such as paralysis and coma stages in a patient’s life. Despite the rapid development of medical science, Euthanasia has been creating a dilemma in the medical field. Euthanasia refers to “bringing about another individual’s death for that individual’s own good through some act or omission” (2). The major ethical and moral issues are raised specifically to voluntary active euthanasia “in which a patient who wants to die is killed” (2).
There are two types of voluntary euthanasia: active and passive. In active euthanasia, a person takes the
…show more content…
Thus, the second argument is based on the fact that, “Competent people should have the right to determine their own futures, euthanasia allows for death with dignity” (2). When we all have the ability to create ourselves, live with our own identities as independent individuals, then we are competent enough to choose voluntary euthanasia to terminate a life which would be very painful to live. Sue Rodriguez, was the first person to raise some of the very important questions regarding Euthanasia. She questioned that “if she cannot give consent to her death, then whose body is it? Whose life is it anyway?” (3). These questions support the argument that as an individual we should have the freedom to decide our death, if faced with terminal illness, which would be for our own good for the health related interests. Therefore, as competent individuals if our life is a private matter then why not death? If we have the right to live our life in way where it does not harm or violates other’s life then other people and state should not interfere in our decision of death given that our death would not violate the rights of