He fought many battles for 8 years all to better his country. When he went to war, all he had on his mind was to expand Rome. He didn't think about what people were going through at home. He also didn't think that his friends would betray him when he returned. Caesars army fought big and small battles.
Julius Caesar was one of Rome’s most successful and outstanding leaders. The question of whether or not he deserved to die is very simple. No, Julius Caesar did not deserve to be assassinated for the good of Rome because he was the good of Rome. Politically, militaristically, and economically he benefited Rome. Did the conspirators kill Caesar for the good of Rome or for their own personal motives?
Julius Caesar was a Powerful Roman politician and general, who served as a god to the Romans. He played a key role in the events that led to the downfall of the Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman empire. His reign from 49 B.C to 44 B.C illustrated his dominance in controlling a commanding army and ruling a nation. Many historians have different opinions on Caesar's command. Some saw him as a leader for the people, whereas others saw him as a man searching for power and power alone.
Caesar’s military activities in Gaul, Germany, and Britain campaigns had significantly important impacted the Roman Republic. Along with a substantial impact on the Roman Republic, the campaigns had prolonged both Caesars political and military career. The campaigns had offered the Roman Republic many advantages that includes; extending their clientele for future military campaigns, provided the Romans great recruiting grounds for their troops, and prolonged the amount of money the Roman Province had. This was all due to Caesars military activity in the Gallic Wars. “Caesar longed for a high command, a great army, and a pioneering war in which his brilliant qualities could be demonstrated”
With an army that had great size and power it made it possible for him to conquer and expanded his empire. At control of one of the most power army and largest empire known to man at that time, Caesar could rule largely by fear and tactical control over aspects of life such as government, trade, politics, and society. In much of Greek and/or Roman culture and society during ancient times respect, popularity, and fame was judge by a man military experiences and
In the beginning of the fall of Rome Julius Caesar was convinced something needed to be changed. Rising through the political ranks, he eventually became governor of Gaul. This gave Caesar the opportunity to rise a lot of money, and because he became a general that gave him more power and respect. By 50 BC, Caesar made many powerful enemies With his life in danger he invaded Italy. Over the next few years Caesar defeated his enemies and gained more power.
He also ended the rule of corrupt Roman nobles that were abusing their power. Caesar was a great military leader because he cared about winning wars and about his soldiers. He had strategic military leadership that won over the support of not only the Roman Republic but also his soldiers. Furthermore,
His military successes demonstrate the actions of a strong leader who aided the Roman Empire. A leader with a strong military and political influence, as Julius Caesar had, gave him a lot of influence over the Roman Empire. His influence expanded to the devotion of his soldiers. He felt that the “goodwill and hearty service of his soldiers, those who in other expeditions were ordinary men, displayed courage past defeating or withstanding when they went upon any danger where Caesar’s glory was concerned” (Plutarch 3). He managed to create an army that was not just men who were told to fight but instead, men who felt connected to him and would do anything to fight under his rule.
Caesar had a long and successful military career, from Bibracte to the crossing of the Rubicon. He was seen as a strong and competent leader, and the victories he achieved on the battlefield only increased his popularity and influence among the people. In Rome, strength was valued greatly within leadership. His military success also allowed him to forge alliances with influential military leaders and politicians, further solidifying his power base.
“Caesar was not a historian: he was a political war-lord in need of good public relations material to confuse both friends and enemies in Rome about the true nature of his activities in Gaul.” [Historian Alisha Rankin] The Gallic War commentaries written by Caesar dictate how the war provided Caesar with the opportunity for further political legitimacy, his conquest of Gaul presented the ability for Caesar to position himself as “a defender of Rome's interests and a champion of Roman values” [Historian Arthur Sonny]. By greatly expanding Rome’s land and territories, along with subduing or enslaving foreign enemies, Caesar could claim that he was acting in the best interests of the Republic. This claim of dedication was extremely influential during this time of political turmoil, allowing Caesar to act upon his ambitions as he continued to garner support from many who believed there was a need for a strong leader such as him to restore stability to Rome. Caesar’s writing upon his prowess in his military campaigns and tactics “carefully crafts his image as a visionary leader and Roman hero, shaping public opinion and solidifying
The Great War has ended, as major foreign dignitaries from around the world have signed the Treaty of Versailles. This tragedy led to about 8.5 million soldier deaths in a mere four years. This meant that on average, about 5820 military combatants died every day. What led to this horrific tragedy? One aspect of the staggering casualty number is military innovations and outdated tactics.
Second is that Caesar could be crooked and not care about the people. Lastly the people only want him because of all the people he conquered. Empires never last forever because one person has all the power that’s why there’s not many left. When one person is in charge of an entire civilization there is only one opinion that will play a huge factor for the people living there. A organized government with a congress and senators will help make the right decision and not mess up in way that could cause a war.
Julius Caesar, while he lived an extraordinary life, was not very different from any of the politicians in his day. He may have even been more conventional than some of the great men of his time, like Pompey. While he had a spectacular ending to his career, “he did not have a similarly glorious rise to power.” Caesar was very successful at playing the game of Roman politics. Even in his later years his tactics and accomplishments are equal to those of Pompey, Crassus, and Sulla.
He paved for the end of a republic and the beginning of an Empire, his journey from his native Troy to Italy is told in the Aeneid by Virgil one of great works of Roman Literature. When his father died suddenly in 55 BC, he was forced to go into hiding in order to save himself from the new emperor Sulla. Therefore, he joined the army and there was no looking back, he began his military career with the siege of Mytilene. Julius Caesar was always a brave soldier and recognized for his work. Pirates on a ship in the Aegean Sea captured him once and he told them that the ransom they demanded was not good enough and that he would crucify them and he was free, Julius Caesar true to his words he gathered the fleet and crucified them.
Senators, We are gathered here today to discuss a exceedingly pressing matter. Men among us desire to kill Caesar. I strongly believe that Caesar should be spared because he is an intelligent leader, one who thinks for the people below him and a man who is not afraid to defy authority. First of all Julius is a leader who is able to make smart decisions for the good of everyone.
