ipl-logo

Was Julius Caesar Actions Justified

828 Words4 Pages

Julius Caesars actions were okay because everything he did was for the good of his country. If he committed a crime, it was to help Rome expand or get more money, I know this because Rome became richer and bigger. But if you're gonna do something bad and think you're helping out, think about the consequences. Caesars actions were justified when he tried to murder Vercingétorix, he committed adultery with Cleopatra, and took over countries to expand land. Julius Caesar almost broke the law when he wanted to kill Vercingétorix. When Caesar invaded Gaul, Vercingétorix stood his ground in front of his house. Caesars army tried to kill him but Caesar spared his life. Later Vercingétorix went against Caesar and gathered men for an army to destroy him. Therefore Caesar had every right to kill Vercingétorix. Even though Caesar did not kill him personally, he has intentions to kill him. Vercingétorix was executed in front of Rome. Julius just wanted was to protect Rome. Vercingétorix was stupid to go against Caesar. He had to have known he …show more content…

He fought many battles for 8 years all to better his country. When he went to war, all he had on his mind was to expand Rome. He didn't think about what people were going through at home. He also didn't think that his friends would betray him when he returned. Caesars army fought big and small battles. Every time he won, Rome would be expanded. Therefor Caesar did not expect the Consul to betray him, he thought they were gonna be happy he is making Rome more powerful. Caesars intentions were not to become dictator of Rome, he wanted to make it more powerful and he got caught up in the excitement of battle. He fought many battles, many armies, and lost many men. He did it all for the good of Rome. If he wouldn't have done any of this, Rome would've probably gone broke, or been taken over. If either of those things were to happen, Rome would've failed as a

Show More
Related
562 Words | 3 Pages

Caesar’s military accomplishments played a vital role in restoring Rome. The various endeavours Caesar undertook as a military commander during the 58 – 50 BC Gallic wars benefitted Rome immensely, as Caesar subdued Gaul, made leeway in previously uncharted Britain, (source 5) established loyalties and increased the state of finances. Plutarch, a Greek-born Roman historian, praises “Caesars achievements [which] surpass [that of the greatest generals]” (source 5). Despite a one century detachment from events and pro-imperial nature (unseen), Plutarch offers a fairly reliable viewpoint. It could be inferred Caesar would have been unable to strengthen and expand Rome without such military capabilities.

Read More
740 Words | 3 Pages

He was also was a very bad man. He would kill all people that would disagree with him, was a terrible leader, and weak. He was a terrible leader because he was not going to go to the traditional race at the festival of Lupercal. The only reason he was not going to go is because a soothsayer told him to beware the ides of March, March fifteenth to be specific. Julius Caesar is a man that the conspirators would consider a bad man.

Read More
594 Words | 3 Pages

Although he done it for Rome it still shows he’s a very dishonorable since he betrayed his friend Caesar. After Brutus killed Caesar he later began to have mixed feelings about what he had done. The example of Brutus betraying Caesar supports my claim because it shows he’s a bad person. One who betrays someone, especially their own friend will always be seen as a bad and dishonorable person. If Brutus wanted to be a good friend instead of a follower of the conspirators he would have sat down and talked to Caesar about all the problems.

Read More
1096 Words | 5 Pages

At only nineteen, he had his own army and freed the Republic and made himself ruler. He executed many wars throughout his lifetime and “when victorious [he] spared all citizens who sought pardon.” He did this because he wasn’t seeking to kill innocent people. He wanted to have a strong, peaceful empire. His victories allowed him to restore peace to Gallic and Spanish provinces and also to the Alps, which no other roman had been able to do.

Read More
510 Words | 3 Pages

Julius Caesar was a political and military leader whose reign marked the beginning of the Roman Empire and the end of the Roman Republic. Caesar did not always follow the law to get the power that he obtained. Caesar once stated, “If you must break the law, do it to seize power; in all other cases, observe it.” If Caesar saw a way to get power, he took the opportunity even if it meant breaching the law.

Read More
970 Words | 4 Pages

“Caesar was not a historian: he was a political war-lord in need of good public relations material to confuse both friends and enemies in Rome about the true nature of his activities in Gaul.” [Historian Alisha Rankin] The Gallic War commentaries written by Caesar dictate how the war provided Caesar with the opportunity for further political legitimacy, his conquest of Gaul presented the ability for Caesar to position himself as “a defender of Rome's interests and a champion of Roman values” [Historian Arthur Sonny]. By greatly expanding Rome’s land and territories, along with subduing or enslaving foreign enemies, Caesar could claim that he was acting in the best interests of the Republic. This claim of dedication was extremely influential during this time of political turmoil, allowing Caesar to act upon his ambitions as he continued to garner support from many who believed there was a need for a strong leader such as him to restore stability to Rome. Caesar’s writing upon his prowess in his military campaigns and tactics “carefully crafts his image as a visionary leader and Roman hero, shaping public opinion and solidifying

Read More
802 Words | 4 Pages

Brutus realized the great harm Caesar could bring to Rome if the was crowned king. Although Brutus was easily persuaded by Cassius to go as far as committing a murder, Brutus did it because he thought that it was the best for Rome. Brutus does what he thinks is the absolute best for Rome which really shows his great honor and

Read More
508 Words | 3 Pages

This should not have happened to Julius Caesar after all he did for Rome and its

Read More
310 Words | 2 Pages

One of the likely reasons Julius Caesar was killed was his obliviousness to stay seated while the Senators went to the sanctuary of Venus Genetrix. Suetonius saw this condition as a reprehensible affront (78). As well as Appian who reports it as "slanderers a reason for indicting him of wishing to be welcomed as a ruler" (107). As a matter of fact Suetonius says that Julius had a negative reaction to Pontinus Aquila when he didn 't ascend for him (78). In some ways Julius is being hypocritical towards Aquila, but Julius doing the exact same insult to the senate.

Read More
604 Words | 3 Pages

he killed Caesar because Caesar was going to lead rome in the wrong direction. he lied to his fellow leaders of Rome because it was the only way he knew how to make is home Rome the greatest city. as stated

Read More
350 Words | 2 Pages

He would have rather watched himself die a thousand deaths than to watch his city in peril. Cassius helped talk Brutus into killing Caesar over jealousy. Brutus only went along with the idea because he knew that Caesar was an improper ruler for rome and its people. Brutus put his city and its people n front of him and that was his tragic flaw. Since brutus put his city before himself t stopped him from thinking what was the best himself.

Read More
1255 Words | 6 Pages

For starters, he is the reason the Roman Republic fell and the Roman Empire rose. Despite the rise of the empire was a relatively good geographical outcome, the fact that it was governed by a dictatorship, created a few problems. One being that most Romans were not in favor of a monarchical life. But, when he came into power the first thing that he did was make extreme cutbacks on the Senate. This can also be a result of his power thirst.

Read More
508 Words | 3 Pages

Since Caesar had defeated Pompey, a military and political leader during the Roman Republic, in battle and was a roman general at the time, Caesar went on to conquer and take control of Gaul ( modern day France) and allied himself with Cleopatra in Egypt by marrying her. Caesar was expecting to become dictator for life because of his accomplishments without the Senate voting on him. This shows that Caesar wanted anything that would better him in life and brings us to the next topic about how Caesar didn’t think about others first. This shows that Caesar wanted anything that would better him in life.

Read More
700 Words | 3 Pages

It is because of this view that he conspired to kill Caesar, pursuing his

Read More
1179 Words | 5 Pages

Julius Caesar was a politician, general, and dictator. He once said, “It is easier to find men who will volunteer to die than to find those who are willing to endure pain with patience.” He was an incredible speaker of the time and was very well liked by most citizens. He brought a lot of change to Rome and was a very strong leader. Julius Gaius Caesar was born in Rome Italy, in 100 B.C., on July 13th.

Read More

More about Was Julius Caesar Actions Justified

Related Topics

Open Document