Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The philosophies and social outlooks of W.E. B. DuBois
Web dubois vs booker t washington
Booker t washington vs. w.e.b. dubois dbq
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Achieving African American Equality Booker T. Washington and W.E.B Du Bois were two of the most influential advocates for African American equality during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries (Blatty, 1). Although both men ultimately had the same goal, their methods for achieving African American equality were remarkably different. To begin, the men had conflicting ideas about what constituted as African American equality. Booker T. Washington argued that the accumulation of wealth and the ability to prove that Blacks were productive members of society would be the mark of true equality for African Americans (Painter, 155).
In the mid-to-late 1800s the African American community faced opposition and segregation. They were segregated from the whites and treated as second-class citizens. This segregation was caused in part by Jim Crow laws. Jim Crow laws separated races in schools, hospitals, parks, public buildings, and transportation systems. Both Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. Du Bois had ideas on how to improve African American lives, Washington believed in starting at the bottom and working up whereas Du Bois had an opposing viewpoint he saw starting from the bottom as submissive and believed African Americans should hold important jobs in order to demand equal treatment.
Booker T. Washington and WEB Dubois used many strategies and work ethics to help stop and decrease the discrimination against African Americans in the 19th and 20th Centuries. They both helped with education and Literacy for People of color. Dubois believed that social equality needed to be demanded and fought for. While Washington Believed that It needed to be earned. They both have very different views about it but still believe the same thing; education is important for everyone.
However Booker T. Washington believed in having a more skillful education, consisting of learning how to trade, mastering agriculture skills and more things one would need to get a job. However, W.E.B DuBois also put many efforts to achieve equal rights towards African Americans which Booker T Washington put on hold. Booker T Washington’s plan was to make it so that “Blacks would [have to] accept segregation and discrimination but their eventual acquisition of wealth and culture would gradually win for them the respect and acceptance of whites”. This vision that Booker T Washington had “practically accepts the alleged inferiority of the Negro race”. W.E.B commented on this process saying it was an attempt, “to educate black boys and girls simply as servants and underlings.”
I can see what both are saying but I am going to have to go with DuBois on this one. I believe that every who can have an education should indeed have one. Washington believed in gradual equality for black people, which means he wanted it to come slowly. Dubois wanted it right now and he didn’t want to wait. Washington was one to take it slow and work on getting respect and finance.
In “The Game of Life”, every roll of the die advances the player one step closer to their ultimate goal. Before reaching their ultimate goal, players must make important decisions involving security that could influence their fate. For instance, a participant can choose if they want their journey to be on the ‘safe path’ or the ‘risky path’. In history, two early leaders of the African American community, Booker T. Washington and W.E.B Du Bois, selected different paths that shaped their strategies for black social and economic progress. They noticed that even though they were afforded a free status, they did not earn equality.
W.E.B. Dubois and Booker T. Washington were civil rights leaders who had different views about how to help African Americans in their struggle for full civil rights. Dubois was born into a free black family but Washington was born into slavery. As a result they had a different approach to the situation. Washington believed that the best approach would be to accept their situation and work hard in order to prove to white people that they were an asset to society. He encouraged them to set aside their demand for equality, to focus on educating themselves, “The wisest among my race understand that the agitation of questions of social equality is the extremist folly and that progress in the enjoyment of all privileges that will come to us, must
Booker T. Washington was born a slave and worked as a janitor to get through school. Whereas W.E.B. Du Bois was born in the North and faced very little discrimination, and had an easier time getting into College. They were well educated, and the only difference between them was how they were raised in different environments. Both were on the journey to improve African American’s social and political status in America. However, they had different methods for getting what they wanted.
W.E.B Dubois and Booker T. Washington, both had different opinions on the best way for African Americans to change their situations, based on education, politics and
"If you want to lift up yourself, lift up someone else," this was Booker T. Washington's method of a social, political, and economic upbringing. He believed in the theory of accommodationism, in which the basis of the thory was to accept the racial status quo and provide manual labor to climb the social, economic, and political ladder to receive equal status. On the contrary, DuBois pointed out that the approach provided by Washington "produced on disfranchisement, "civil inferiority," and a "withdrawal of aid from institutions for the higher training of the Negro" (White, 460). Moreover, DuBois claimed that Washingtons approach "shifted the burden of the Negro problem to the Negro shoulders" (White , 460). DuBois's criticism of Washingtons'
Booker T. Washington founded the Tuskegee institute which is still a predominate and successful black university today. He believed that the route to equality came from hard work and the education of the black race. While he did urge freed slaves to educate themselves, he did accept the civil liberties that were being taken away from them. W.E.B. Du Bois on the other hand, believed this was unacceptable. He also belittled Washington’s school for not acting quickly enough to educate African Americans but, also said they were not learning anything that would be considered higher learning.
He was criticized for urging African Americans to avoid political action and militant organizing. W.E.B. Du Bois, thought this strategy would continue white oppression, so he advocated political action and protest. Also, he taught it was the responsibility of “The Talented Tenth” to steer the majority away from contamination; whereas, Booker T. Washington thought more individualistic in his idea that we all must take it upon ourselves to become educated. Washington’s teachings were accepted by whites because they agreed African Americans should gain respect through education. Although not everyone agreed with him, his indisputable influence kickstarted the civil rights
I support both Richard Wright’s and Dubois’s perspectives. From my understanding, I saw both literature pieces describing the importance of African American self-expression in both art and propaganda. I believe the goal of both literature pieces were to explain the importance of expression in a society that hushed the African American and forced them to fill a stereotype that was mentally enslaving the creative minds of writers and artists. I personally support both of the author’s standpoints because neither Wright nor DuBois blamed any race in particular. Instead, the authors portrayed “a society in need of recalibration”, or in other words, everyone had to change.
By saying this, Louis wants to point out that nothing except politics exists in the USA and that all religious movements and the strife over race are actually about politics. Even though he deeply wishes to portray himself as a Leftist progressive and would never admit to sharing the particular right-based, Locke-inspired creed of liberal America, he does, according to Corby (22), clearly subscribe to the notion that America’s identity is creedal. He infuriates Belize, a gay African-American, by suggesting that in America “it’s not really about race” (Kushner 2011: 98). Indeed, for Louis, this is what gives America a radical potential and why he continues to believe in America without a “monolith” (Kushner 2011: 96) such as race to overcome;
Two Great Men “Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is always to try just one more time. ”- Thomas a. Edison Frederick Douglas and Booker T. Washington were both amazing civil rights activists. Frederick Douglas was a runaway slave who worked to end slavery.