ipl-logo

What Are The Arguments Against Catiline Cicero

518 Words3 Pages

Cicero’s Arguments
In Cicero text “First Oration Against Catiline”, he is addressing the Roman Senate about the plot to overthrow the government. Cicero argues that Catiline has made several attempts on not only his life, but on the lives of other Senators during this plot. Even with this personal investment in the plot, Cicero is arguing that the Senate doesn’t have the power to execute a Roman citizen as Lucius Opimius decreed in an earlier plot against the state. (Cicero 229) Cicero goes on to debate the execution or exiling of Catiline by Senate with a persuasive argument to exile the conspirators like a disease, by placing wall between the conspirators and the citizens. (Cicero 242) Cicero argument is filled with frustration against both the Senate and the Catiline’s plot, but Cicero is in favor of exiling Catiline due to his support of the law. …show more content…

Cicero is frustrated with the delay in a decision as seen in his example of Saturninus. Where Saturninus punishment was decided within a day, but Catiline’s decision has taken over twenty day. (Cicero 229) Cicero continues with his persuasion with the claim that executing Catiline will slow the conspiracy not stop it as most believe. (Cicero 241) Cicero goes on to reinforce his belief in exiling Catiline, by presenting that Catiline will lead the conspirator from the city if he is exiled. Cicero believes this will make the city safer by allowing the conspirators to regroup outside the city wall and Senate will be able to focus on one target instead of multiple hidden conspirators among the Senate. (Cicero 242) Cicero is concerned that the private citizen of Italy may see the execution of Catiline as oppressive and they may assist Catiline’s conspirators in further plots against the state. Cicero wants to show the citizens that the Senate has matured in its decision making

Show More
Related
834 Words | 4 Pages

Later Pompey is given victory and Verres returns to Rome. Finally, Cicero is able to sumit his request to prosecute Verres but another snobbish senator, Caecilius Niger, wants to also prosecute Verres and Cicero has to go and go against a biased jury to be able to prosecute first. Then Cicero leaves Rome and goes to Sicily and they find a lot of crucial evidence to win their

Read More
182 Words | 1 Pages

Firstly Brutus one of the conspirators was a very big part in the death of Julius. If Brutus did not convince Caesar to go to the senate that day as in document C he would not have gone. But Brutus who was said to be Caesar 's friend in Doc C wanted him to stop so Brutus himself could gain power. Cassius the other big conspirator openly expressed his hatred. This is shown in document A where after a war Caesar gave money to low class people.

Read More
584 Words | 3 Pages

While the Republic continued on, Tiberius’ murder established a precedent for resolving conflicts with spur-of-the-moment violence. Following in Nasica’s footsteps, the conspirators band together to murder Caesar by stabbing him twenty-three times. Just minutes before they commit Caesar’s murder, Cassius and Brutus are still building up the courage to commit such an

Read More
3332 Words | 14 Pages

Moreover, it provides some correct information about the content of the speech, though it lacks depth and devotes too much attention to minor aspects of the speech, which subsequently leads to a failure in capturing Cicero’s true intentions while delivering the speech. Immediately, ChatGPT is incorrect in saying this speech was delivered to the Roman Senate. It was actually delivered to an assembly of the Roman people. Cicero begins his speech by saying, “Although I have always particularly enjoyed the sight of you thronging this place, and have always

Read More
330 Words | 2 Pages

The Senate, did not kill Caesar. It was a group of resentful and angry Senators, such as Cassius and Brutus who disliked Caesar. Some Senators supported Caesar. There are two conflicting reasons on the assassination of Caesar.

Read More
740 Words | 3 Pages

I came, I saw, I conquered! Skylin Kinkead Skylin Kinkead Mrs. Samson English 10 5 May, 2017 Essay Was Caesar really a bad man? He had great qualities to be a leader, but the conspirators had a great reason to kill Caesar.

Read More
391 Words | 2 Pages

There has always been a discussion on whether Julius Caesar was a hero or a tyrant, “Killing Caesar” by Jon Herman gives the readers a reason why he is such of a hero in some eyes and a tyrant in others. To answer that Julius Caesar was a hero. During Julius Caesar’s reign he made life in Rome higher quality than it was before. In the article “Killing Caesar” it says, “For the average Roman, Caesar’s rule was a blessing. ”This must mean that the type of government Rome had was dreadful.

Read More
550 Words | 3 Pages

In that quote he uses the either or fallacy to justify killing Caesar. He asks “Who is here so base that would be a bondman” (III, ii, 29-30). He also asks, “Who is here so vile that will not love his country?” (III,ii, 33-34). By asking the people a serious of questions that he knows they

Read More
90 Words | 1 Pages

If I were in Catalines position I would simply tell Cicero that he didn 't have any proof of anything that he was accusing me of, Cicero is using rhetoric to make wild accusations against Cataline and pretending to restrain himself from punishing Cataline, telling the senate, and exposing him when he doesn 't actually have anything to expose him of. Since Cicero was a high ranking official in the roman senate he was able to make claims against Cataline because who would believe a possible conspirator or a high raking official.

Read More
508 Words | 3 Pages

I think that Caesar did not deserve to be murdered for the fact that he had a different view than other people. In (act II,scene 1,line 32-34) the text says “And therefore think him as a serpent’s egg which,hatched,would as his kind grow mischievous and kill him in the shell.” This text is saying that he is evil and should be killed. Conspirators should not have killed Caesar. Just because someone has different views and opinions that you don't like you can't murder them for that.

Read More
701 Words | 3 Pages

In life, problems arise frequently. With problems one has to make decisions that are hard to make. It is difficult to find the right decision that will be best for everyone but it is not what the heart is wanting. Brutus, Cassius, and the conspirators have a big decision to kill Caesar or not to kill Caesar. Cassius knows in his head what he must do for Rome and himself.

Read More
949 Words | 4 Pages

Antony’s Speech Using Rhetorical Appeals In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, after Caesar’s death, the Romans are conflicted about what should be done. After Brutus’ speech the Romans are ready to crown Brutus king and be on the conspirators’ side. Though Brutus then leaves the crowd while Antony delivers his speech, the crowd realizes what should be done of Caesar’s murder and Antony prevents the conspirators from getting away with the murder of Caesar.

Read More
528 Words | 3 Pages

Intro: “Belief can be manipulated. Only knowledge is dangerous” as Frank Herbert once said. People may manipulate others to do their biddings in order to achieve their personal goals. No matter how hard it is, manipulators eventually reach their prey. This is the plan Cassius uses to initiate his final plan, to kill Caesar.

Read More
1255 Words | 6 Pages

Julius Caesar was a Powerful Roman politician and general, who served as a god to the Romans. He played a key role in the events that led to the downfall of the Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman empire. His reign from 49 B.C to 44 B.C illustrated his dominance in controlling a commanding army and ruling a nation. Many historians have different opinions on Caesar's command. Some saw him as a leader for the people, whereas others saw him as a man searching for power and power alone.

Read More
1298 Words | 6 Pages

A “system” may be described as a complex of interacting components together with the relationships among them that permit the identification of a boundary-maintaining entity or process, (Laszlo & Krippner, 1998). What sets apart a health system is that its purpose is concerned with people’s health. A health system has many components. It includes Ministries of Health; healthcare professionals; patients, families, and communities; healthcare facilities; pharmaceutical companies, and other organizations that each play an important role in the promotion, restoration and maintenance of health, (The World Health Report, 2000). Countries all over the world use different types of healthcare systems based on their economic state and the level of organization.

Read More

More about What Are The Arguments Against Catiline Cicero

Related Topics

Open Document